I'm leaving shortly, so I'll just address this, no Q did not cause the mass break from Rivals, Rivals did.
Yes, unquestionably, I think if Trump had led on the issue instead of sitting back and allowing many of his followers believe he had a "plan", we'd be way down the road further than we are now. The pressure we could have exerted if we were properly organized, a loser like Lindsey Graham would be terrified to say on national tv that Trump has to let 2020 go. Would we have the wherewithal to correct 2020 without resorting to the most extreme measures? I don't know, I doubt it, but unfortunately, many patriots sat on their hands - and still do to this day - because they believed a grand plan is going to unfold and Trump be reinstated.
How is Flynn credible on the subject? Or for that matter, any subject? Because he posed in some photos giving Q the thumbs up? He was undeniably outfoxed by Comey and Biden and Rice, and had to sit out Trump's entire presidency.
But that's all irrelevant to your initial post to me on this matter. Pulitzer said Q was BS. His words. You dismiss that as if he's lived in a bubble and knows nothing of it, which would be a virtual impossibility for someone in his position. There is no being an expert on Q or the Plan. The "experts" are morons like X22 who believe Trump is running the show and his reinstatement is a foregone conclusion. I'd say Pulitzer's smart enough to know that if Flynn and Q had a hand to play, they'd have played it long before multiplied millions of lives were destroyed. But fact is, they don't. Deep in their hearts, everyone ITT knows it
We likely wouldn't have been organized enough to leave to our own place without a multiyear 'Q' thread holding a core group together. Rivals is the reason we left, but not the reason we've sunk tens of thousands of dollars into our own site.
I like paragraph two. There are some good thoughts on how things may have been different. If Q is total BS and Trump called it out, things definitely would be different. No argument from me. Since you were not into the 'Q' stuff, were you a patriot that did not sit on your hands? If so what have you done above and beyond?
Flynn was literally the director of the NSA, one of our top intelligence agencies. He was frequently referenced in the posts, he has openly supported Q far more than photo ops. Just because it doesn't support your point of you view, doesn't mean you get to outright dismiss it because it's inconvenient.
I agree with Pulitzer's statements regarding random internet guys, like X22, not having much credibility. I don't follow any of them because I don't find them credible. However, as I frequently mentioned, Pulitzer is no more of an authority on that topic than they are given his other contradictory associations with people like Flynn. His statements are not unique, new, or authoritative on that topic.
Can people not handle the possibility that
@ETNVol might be right?
Not saying he is but I don't see a reason to go unhinged about everything he says because no one actually knows.
Regardless, he's been around for a while. He's good people and he's on our side. It certainly doesn't hurt to temper expectations
Oh, totally. I think big picture he could end up being spot on. It's nothing many of us don't consider to be a reasonable scenario. Although not explicitly stated like that, that scenario was in my original response.
His stubborn refusal to even hypothetically entertain other thoughts, with a constructive discourse, and to rationalize away pertinent details that don't fit only his POV gets frustrating. This is why he becomes divisive.
Outside of this particular topic, I enjoy what he brings to the board.
He might be but it’s all about delivery and tone
This.