Where can I protest THIS?

[TheRealJohnCooper]

Goddam at the retardation that entered this thread. Holy fuck.

 

[OPD77]

View attachment 210280

Just another lovely evening in Iowa.

 

[CuriousFiend]

EXACTLY!!! Why is eveyone so quick in jumping to conclusions?!

Two side notes: One: I didn't even include those video links in any of my Lemmy Posts, but I did include that exact same body of the thread shown above. Yet they perma-banned me for "CSAM" and when I tried to appeal the ban, they gave me this:
Hello,

you will NEVER be unbanned, you will NEVER be allowed back into here. You asked where to post CSAM. CSAM is **NOT** allowed IN ANY WAY!

With regards,
Lemmy.world Support

And two: I need to illustrate for the most part, but many subreddits or forum sites don't accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! So how else am I suppose to illustrate what I'm explaining?

Many of the people viewing this really are blowing this whole topic all out of proportion!

I feel wrongfully accused as a pedophile and I am owed compensation by Lemmy World along with the many other forum or thread sites that wrongfully removed my thread and/or banned me.

"Many of the people viewing this really are blowing this whole topic all out of proportion!"



I would strongly encourage considering taking a good look in the metaphorical mirror.

Objectively there is one individual who is blowing your topic out proportion.

What information you have provided so far seems to indicate either-(a) you are a troll of some variant, or-(b) as you-yourself mentioned being autistically inclinded...and if the latter is true, well you certainly are not the only one here right now.

So, assuming for a moment here that (b) is the reality for you, then based on the current information you've provided, the linguistic behaviours indicate hyper-fixation.

May I ask when this specific OP subject first became such a significant priority for you?

 

[CuriousFiend]

@Cartoondude135

Furthermore: (*Quote*)

•"Getting super interested in something is totally normal."

•"This may be in the form of a newfound interest in crocheting or painting or binge-watching your favorite television show."

•"However, your interests should not consume most of your time and come at the cost of your responsibilities, personal well-being, and relationships."

•"Hyperfixation is when your passion turns into a continuous obsession."

•"When you become fully engrossed by something, it interferes with your daily functioning."

•"Focusing on something else becomes difficult since the object of your hyperfixation OCD has become all-consuming."

•"Luckily, hyperfixation can be managed, and we'll look at how to deal with it."

(*Link*)

https://healthmatch.io/ocd/hyperfixation-ocd

 

[CuriousFiend]

@Cartoondude135

Additional information: (*Quote*)

•"Hyperfixation is a state of intense focus on a given activity."

•"A hyperfixated state can last anywhere from a few seconds to several hours… and in extreme cases even days or months."

•"Being around someone who is hyperfixated on something can be crazy-making, but there are actually important advantages to being in a hyperfixated state."

•"When you look at the top of any field, whether it’s business, sports, hobbies or gaming, you’ll most likely find someone who spends a lot of their time hyperfixated on their chosen field."


(*Link*)

6 Extraordinary Benefits of Hyperfixation - Oxford Specialist Tutors Online

Hyperfixation is often seen as a problem. In fact, it has 6 extraordinary benefits. Hyperfixation is a strategy of success.

oxfordspecialisttutors.com

 

[Cartoondude135]

@Cartoondude135

Additional information: (*Quote*)

•"Hyperfixation is a state of intense focus on a given activity."

•"A hyperfixated state can last anywhere from a few seconds to several hours… and in extreme cases even days or months."

•"Being around someone who is hyperfixated on something can be crazy-making, but there are actually important advantages to being in a hyperfixated state."

•"When you look at the top of any field, whether it’s business, sports, hobbies or gaming, you’ll most likely find someone who spends a lot of their time hyperfixated on their chosen field."


(*Link*)

6 Extraordinary Benefits of Hyperfixation - Oxford Specialist Tutors Online

Hyperfixation is often seen as a problem. In fact, it has 6 extraordinary benefits. Hyperfixation is a strategy of success.

oxfordspecialisttutors.com

Remember what I said?

Many subreddits or forum sites don't accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I'm witnessing!

In this case, the sentences "It's one thing to say a girl's outfit is 'too revealing', it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look 'modest' for a yearbook." actually corresponded to several videos I beared witness to on Inside Edition's YouTube channel.

So every one of you who encouraged me to commit you know what along with those who wrongfully snubbed me as a pedo as well as removed my thread or banned me owe me a major apology or a compensation package!

 

[CuriousFiend]

@Cartoondude135

Right now, there are far more worthy causes whereupon your intellectual capacities may do good were they focused responsibly.

For 1 example: Are you aware of what is currently happening to innocent men, women and children in the Gaza concentration camp?




I am unable to upload videos to this tfsf forum, however I will share two video's link's on my forum.
(*note: forum registration is required to view content.)

Post in thread 'Ze crypto-"jews"' https://nzfsf.nz/index.php?threads/ze-crypto-jews.12449/post-24506


Post in thread 'Ze crypto-"jews"' https://nzfsf.nz/index.php?threads/ze-crypto-jews.12449/post-24518

 

[CuriousFiend]

Remember what I said?

Many subreddits or forum sites don't accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I'm witnessing!

In this case, the sentences "It's one thing to say a girl's outfit is 'too revealing', it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look 'modest' for a yearbook." actually corresponded to several videos I beared witness to on Inside Edition's YouTube channel.

So every one of you who encouraged me to commit you know what along with those who wrongfully snubbed me as a pedo as well as removed my thread or banned me owe me a major apology or a compensation package!

No @Cartoondude135. I see exactly what you have written.

Your peculiar logic clearly appears to be from a significantly disturbed cognitive state right now.

There is very little any of us, let alone anyone else online, could do to help you.

It is entirely your responsibility to correct you current errors of self.

Because there is only one individual who owes you an apology for your own behaviour.

You are that one individual.

 

[CuriousFiend]

@Cartoondude135

Additional information: (*Quote*)

•"Fixations vs Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Children with Autism"

•"Fixation, or hyper-focusing on a specific interest, is a recognized feature of autism."

•"Fixations, along with other features or symptoms of autism like repetitive behaviors and cognitive inflexibility, may appear from the outside to be symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)."

•"OCD, however, is not itself a symptom of autism."

•"That said, OCD is a common comorbid anxiety disorder—that is, a separate disorder that often appears alongside autism spectrum disorder—affecting an estimated 17% of individuals with autism."


(*Link*)

Fixations or OCD – Signs of Autism in Children - The Place for Children with Autism

While fixations associated with autism are not always harmful, many individuals also suffer from OCD, a serious anxiety disorder.

theplaceforchildrenwithautism.com

 

[imprimis]

Look at the videos below and you'll see Lemmy World mods are blowing this all out of proportion!



It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing",



it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait!



But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

I won't stand idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get this type of treatment for the foreseeable future! I'm going to stand up and set things right! I'm gonna show that the female should get the same type of nudity acceptance as the male! And from there, you get the rest.

Vid #3 - Her tats are offensive not her thong.

Vid #4 - Many times blurring out tits and other "offensive" things only brings attention to them whereas many times the "blurred" are not even noticed if left alone.

Vid #5 - Why did Mom have to be notified multiple times that there was a fire? Was she too busy to react?

 

[Cartoondude135]

No @Cartoondude135. I see exactly what you have written.

Your peculiar logic clearly appears to be from a significantly disturbed cognitive state right now.

There is very little any of us, let alone anyone else online, could do to help you.

It is entirely your responsibility to correct you current errors of self.

Because there is only one individual who owes you an apology for your own behaviour.

You are that one individual.

Think again, "Smarty-Pants".

I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won't believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for "promoting nudity involving a minor"! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for "spam" - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).

So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I'm witnessing.

So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That's what lead Lemmy World mods to ban me for life for "CSAM" or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn't. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site's posting restrictions) is what lead to this "pedophile" confusion.

I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video... "That's the last straw!" Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can't? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same... rights to do things as any adult! It's about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those "Family Day" episodes of The Price is Right and Let's Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.

I'm not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It's like racist people, but in age form.

Does it look like I'm laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos, I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out "Can't we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?"

We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!

Stop trying to blame it all on me! Remember what Joe King said?


Joe King:
None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn't violate Youtube's TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.

It also does not appear to be a case of anyone actually discussing "CSAM"

Of course it's not.



As for the 9yo blurred out in the last vid, what the OP needs to remember is that in most jurisdictions it is unlawful for a female to be topless in public, and the vid taken inside the home became "public" once it was made publicly available. So you can't really complain about Inside Edition blurring out the girl's chest. Had they not done that and still aired the vid, they very likely would have already gotten into trouble over it.

 

[CuriousFiend]

Think again, "Smarty-Pants".

I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won't believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for "promoting nudity involving a minor"! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for "spam" - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).

So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I'm witnessing.

So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That's what lead Lemmy World mods to ban me for life for "CSAM" or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn't. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site's posting restrictions) is what lead to this "pedophile" confusion.

I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video... "That's the last straw!" Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can't? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same... rights to do things as any adult! It's about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those "Family Day" episodes of The Price is Right and Let's Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.

I'm not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It's like racist people, but in age form.

Does it look like I'm laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos, I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out "Can't we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?"

We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!

Stop trying to blame it all on me! Remember what Joe King said?


Joe King:
None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn't violate Youtube's TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.



Of course it's not.



As for the 9yo blurred out in the last vid, what the OP needs to remember is that in most jurisdictions it is unlawful for a female to be topless in public, and the vid taken inside the home became "public" once it was made publicly available. So you can't really complain about Inside Edition blurring out the girl's chest. Had they not done that and still aired the vid, they very likely would have already gotten into trouble over it.

"Think again, 'smarty-pants'."

Excellent advice. Perhaps try it sometime, or better yet, try thinking—full stop.

...coz ya sound like this genius.

 

[Joe King]

There is very little any of us, let alone anyone else online, could do to help you.

That's certainly the truth.

Vid #3 - Her tats are offensive not her thong.

Would have to agree on that.

Vid #4 - Many times blurring out tits and other "offensive" things only brings attention to them whereas many times the "blurred" are not even noticed if left alone.

That's sorta like the Streisand effect.

Vid #5 - Why did Mom have to be notified multiple times that there was a fire? Was she too busy to react?

Kids prolly scream about shit all the time, and she halfway tunes them out. lol

IMO, the proper response woulda been to run outside and grab the garden hose and at least try to get some amount of water on it until the FD shows up.

Stop trying to blame it all on me! Remember what Joe King said?


Joe King:
None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

I was mostly referring to this site and the reaction some had to your vids. Reddit can have whatever fucked up rules they want.

It's just my opinion that if youtube doesn't have a problem with it, because we all know how anal youtube can sometimes be, that it really shouldn't be a problem anywhere. That it is, just shows how fucked reddit is.

 

[Cartoondude135]

Now my attempt at appealing via https://lemmy.ml/post/10164925 also failed!

Please! Anyone! Help me talk some sense into these numbskulls!

 

[Cartoondude135]

So yeah! No one would answer! Not even Inside Edition themselves were willing to offer an answer when I even found their email address, the sites dedicated to helping those in mental, suicidal, or emotional distress (they even PERMA-banned me for "spam" - that's right, SPAM! (Even though there was absolutely no mention of a permanent ban or rule about "spam" in their forum guidelines!) Is that the definition of "spam" when I make a bad thread only once?! And when I try to appeal the ban, the same message "please contact the administrator if it was done in error" is blocking my ability to click the contact button! Or sometimes it's a blank white page with that message in the top left corner of the window! - Which adds more insult to injury, because I can't click anything as all the buttons have disappeared! That means I can't log out of that site either!), OR the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL let alone the entire topic itself! So I really am at a loss for thoughts AND words on what I just experienced!

That, combined with YouTube having a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post comments on certain-to-random videos (I.E, "ghosting"), I'm forced to take more drastic measures to get my messages across.

It seems everyone is too chicken to even start this subject! Don't these numbskulls know not to judge a book by it's cover?!

 

[Goldhedge]

I'm going out on a limb here....

Don't these numbskulls know not to judge a book by it's cover?!

I think they already have judged the book by its cover....

 

[Joe Kings]

I'm not being a pedophile! I'm just shocked they can execute this type of censorship too!

I felt this is the last straw and someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can't? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same... rights to do things as any adult! It's about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those "Family Day" episodes of The Price is Right and Let's Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.

You’re not welcome here.

 

[Cartoondude135]

You’re not welcome here.

I beg your pardon?!

 

[Cartoondude135]

I just tried on talkingforchange.ca today. - Professional therapists! But even they too were reluctant to talk as they claim my post regarding the censorship of women is not for their platform and they disconnected the chat 2 minutes after that.

THESE PEOPLE ARE PARANOID!

 

[Joe King]

They waited a whole two minutes, huh?

 

[Cartoondude135]

They waited a whole two minutes, huh?

Strike that, I messed up. 5 seconds after their last message to me.

But yeah! These people are paranoid as I mentioned earlier!

See? Not even the professional therapists were willing to sit down and talk this subject that involved various things getting under my skin involving censorship!

 

[thenick_ttu]

Strike that, I messed up. 5 seconds after their last message to me.

But yeah! These people are paranoid as I mentioned earlier!

See? Not even the professional therapists were willing to sit down and talk this subject that involved various things getting under my skin involving censorship!

Get the fuck out of here fedboi. Nobody wants to participate in your pedo fantasy.

Also, whether you’re a fed or not, please kill youself.

 

[Cartoondude135]

Get the fuck out of here fedboi. Nobody wants to participate in your pedo fantasy.

Also, whether you’re a fed or not, please kill youself.

Why do you think they installed nets all around the Golden Gate Bridge or even at the Empire State Building?

You just got reported and you will be punished accordingly.

 

[thenick_ttu]

Why do you think they installed nets all around the Golden Gate Bridge or even at the Empire State Building?

You just got reported and you will be punished accordingly.

Read the room skippy

 

[Cartoondude135]

View attachment 215421




Read the room skippy

Once more, I'm not being a pedo, I'm protesting all these absurd censorship rules and regulations that revolve around the female human - regardless of race and age - after what Inside Edition posted. Watch the videos I found again for clarification.

Can you really hurl insults at Inside Edition or blast them for what they did? It was their idea to publicly publish the footage. Just like how that one photographer made the choice to publicly publish footage of the Napalm Girl when she was 9 and completely nude.

But some areas censored Napalm Girl's nipples, but others did not - excluding her groin. Then there's the diaper boxes I found in any supermarket. And finally... Suprise surprise: typical women being scolded by other people for wearing something "inappropriate" or "showing too much of their body".

I look around and since no one else is protesting about this, I might as well do it! After all, someone's gotta step up to the plate to hit that ball! I will not sit idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get treated/censored like this! I will step up, stand up, and speak out towards these absurd reactions, rules, and regulations that revolve around the appearance and censorship of the female body!

 

[Teeaichsee]

No, I am not on Reddit, although I have read a few things on there. It's too "woke" lefty for my taste. Sounds like this Lemmy World thing is too. So Fuck 'em.

I agree,,reddit and mostly all forums are PC and on the sodomite side of things.They are not places for free thinkers thats for sure.

 

[Rebarcock.]

Get the fuck out of here fedboi. Nobody wants to participate in your pedo fantasy.

Also, whether you’re a fed or not, please kill youself.

Good call dude. Twisted perverts and infiltrators

 

[weaponoffreedom]

If I am understanding this thread correctly, the OP has displayed some information which has been perceived by most as being " child porn bait", under the guise of free speech and censorship? And the OP denies this practice and / or tactic....correct?

 

[Cartoondude135]

If I am understanding this thread correctly, the OP has displayed some information which has been perceived by most as being " child porn bait", under the guise of free speech and censorship? And the OP denies this practice and / or tactic....correct?

How does this sound?

I got banned from Lemmy servers for "CSAM" all because of the Napalm Girl pic and another thing I saw on Inside Edition's channel in addition to some nude statures - literally artwork of naked people - all because I was trying to protest the inconsistencies of censorship towards the female human being viewed via medias - regardless of their race and age! - At least after what Inside Edition published.

Once more, I'm not being a ped, I'm protesting all these absurd censorship rules and regulations that revolve around the female human - regardless of race and age - after what Inside Edition posted. Watch the videos I found again for clarification. In other words, the inconsistencies of female human censorship.

Can you really - you know, hurl insults at Inside Edition or blast them for what they did? It was their idea to publicly publish the footage. Just like how that one photographer made the choice to publicly publish footage of the Napalm Girl when she was 9 and completely nude. Therefore, it should be ok to share this footage anywhere.

But some areas censored Napalm Girl's nipples, but others did not - excluding her groin. Then there's the diaper boxes I found in any supermarket. And finally... Suprise surprise: typical women being scolded by other people for wearing something "inappropriate" or "showing too much of their body". I look around and since no one else is protesting about this, I might as well do it! After all, someone's gotta step up to the plate to hit that ball! I will not sit idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get treated/censored like this! I will step up, stand up, and speak out towards these absurd reactions, rules, and regulations that revolve around the appearance and censorship of the female body! What about the famous Jeanneke Pis in Belgium? Do you think she's trying to promote pedophilia?

Is that simple and clear English to you?

 

[weaponoffreedom]

How does this sound?

I got banned from Lemmy servers for "CSAM" all because of the Napalm Girl pic and another thing I saw on Inside Edition's channel in addition to some nude statures - literally artwork of naked people - all because I was trying to protest the inconsistencies of censorship towards the female human being viewed via medias - regardless of their race and age! - At least after what Inside Edition published.

Once more, I'm not being a ped, I'm protesting all these absurd censorship rules and regulations that revolve around the female human - regardless of race and age - after what Inside Edition posted. Watch the videos I found again for clarification. In other words, the inconsistencies of female human censorship.

Can you really - you know, hurl insults at Inside Edition or blast them for what they did? It was their idea to publicly publish the footage. Just like how that one photographer made the choice to publicly publish footage of the Napalm Girl when she was 9 and completely nude. Therefore, it should be ok to share this footage anywhere.

But some areas censored Napalm Girl's nipples, but others did not - excluding her groin. Then there's the diaper boxes I found in any supermarket. And finally... Suprise surprise: typical women being scolded by other people for wearing something "inappropriate" or "showing too much of their body". I look around and since no one else is protesting about this, I might as well do it! After all, someone's gotta step up to the plate to hit that ball! I will not sit idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get treated/censored like this! I will step up, stand up, and speak out towards these absurd reactions, rules, and regulations that revolve around the appearance and censorship of the female body! What about the famous Jeanneke Pis in Belgium? Do you think she's trying to promote pedophilia?

Is that simple and clear English to you?

Ok. So, I have a question:

Do you think that naked pics of little kids, girls or boys, should be a thing that is allowed on any platform, anywhere, for the world to see?

This is a yes or no question. Please answer yes or no.

 

[Cartoondude135]

Ok. So, I have a question:

Do you think that naked pics of little kids, girls or boys, should be a thing that is allowed on any platform, anywhere, for the world to see?

This is a yes or no question. Please answer yes or no.

Yes. Like the Napalm girl, it not only illustrated the pain she had to endure, but also, it gives people who plan to work as a surgeon or doctor a glimpse of how the human body ages in that gender.

Because now that I analyze that one infamous pic carefully, I can't find any reference visual illustrations of how the human body ages in terms of... well... both genders.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Yes. Like the Napalm girl, it not only illustrated the pain she had to endure, but also, it gives people who plan to work as a surgeon or doctor a glimpse of how the human body ages in that gender.

Because now that I analyze that one infamous pic carefully, I can't find any reference visual illustrations of how the human body ages in terms of... well... both genders.

It was yes or no, you failed. Pedo.

@shiv
this guy should be kicked

It is kind of like talking to a 10 years old online for sex, and going to the meeting, bringing a note saying "I am going to meet this girl to save her from a bad person"

I know this forum is about free speech, but somethings and some people do not deserve the privilege.

 

[Cartoondude135]

It was yes or no, you failed. Pedo.

@shiv
this guy should be kicked

It is kind of like talking to a 10 years old online for sex, and going to the meeting, bringing a note saying "I am going to meet this girl to save her from a bad person"

I know this forum is about free speech, but somethings and some people do not deserve the privilege.

Were you paying attention?

Like the Napalm girl, it not only illustrated the pain she had to endure, but also, it gives people who plan to work as a surgeon or doctor a glimpse of how the human body ages in that gender.

Because now that I analyze that one infamous pic carefully, I can't find any references or visual illustrations of how the human body ages in terms of... well... both genders anywhere.

Can't some of us learn a new subject even though we don't specialize in that sector?

I learned how a Nepenthes pitcher plant grows from a stem to a pitcher-shaped trap (and the growth cycle is more complex than I thought): as it grows, the end of the stem actually inflates to create the pitcher for the insects to fall in. So can't I get a chance to learn how the human body and all it's parts age in terms of both genders?

Why do you think they allow a pic of a topless little boy or girl on diaper boxes?

 

[Cartoondude135]

It was yes or no, you failed. Pedo.

@shiv
this guy should be kicked

It is kind of like talking to a 10 years old online for sex, and going to the meeting, bringing a note saying "I am going to meet this girl to save her from a bad person"

I know this forum is about free speech, but somethings and some people do not deserve the privilege.

And do you know how shunned I already feel after YouTube's stupid comment system is ghosting out random comments on random videos?

 

[Cartoondude135]

It was yes or no, you failed. Pedo.

@shiv
this guy should be kicked

It is kind of like talking to a 10 years old online for sex, and going to the meeting, bringing a note saying "I am going to meet this girl to save her from a bad person"

I know this forum is about free speech, but somethings and some people do not deserve the privilege.

BTW,


Joe King:

CSAM?

Child sexual abuse material.

None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn't violate Youtube's TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.

It also does not appear to be a case of anyone actually discussing "CSAM"

Of course it's not.

 

[Cartoondude135]

It was yes or no, you failed. Pedo.

@shiv
this guy should be kicked

It is kind of like talking to a 10 years old online for sex, and going to the meeting, bringing a note saying "I am going to meet this girl to save her from a bad person"

I know this forum is about free speech, but somethings and some people do not deserve the privilege.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/guelph-parents-angry-after-topless-girl-8-told-to-cover-up-1.3124762

You're the one who failed! Not me!

 

[Mungri]

So I read through this a bit, actually trying to understand why the OP was being attacked as an exercise for empathy training.

OP is taking the angle that underage pics are fine? Thats just a no.

Its like that Balenciaga thing and underage drag queens, people trying to sexualize kids then saying 'this is fine, its your fault if you think its sexual'.

Its nothing but pure bait. Anyone underage should be wrapped in a burka for all I care. UK schools generally adopt full uniforms covering up the entire body, optionally sleeves can be rolled up, and ties and top shirt button undone in hot weather and thats it.

As for the male swim team comparison - they're literally swimming. Same as when you do gym class you change into sports relevant clothes. The swim team isn't walking around in their trunks outside of swim lessons right?

 

[Mungri]

Also I just noticed, I nearly got tricked by this shit. The OP appealing for help from a position of having a genuine problem, despite having little emotion myself I still got lulled into false sympathy.

This is an example of people using mind games that IRL can be considered abusive if they are used to trick vulnerable adults like me into agreeing to do stuff or agree to stuff that I didn't actually want. A good exercise this was in spotting and avoiding it. Back to my default mode of trust no one, OP is a crude and calculating manipulator.

 

[Cartoondude135]

Anyone underage should be wrapped in a burka for all I care

That's your personal opinion (strong expression of a personal feeling); suit yourself. But now I have witnesses to back me up. I just need to find a way to contact them and then I'm ready to fight this absurd treatment.

 

[rpgrem88]

Also I just noticed, I nearly got tricked by this shit. The OP appealing for help from a position of having a genuine problem, despite having little emotion myself I still got lulled into false sympathy.

This is an example of people using mind games that IRL can be considered abusive if they are used to trick vulnerable adults like me into agreeing to do stuff or agree to stuff that I didn't actually want. A good exercise this was in spotting and avoiding it. Back to my default mode of trust no one, OP is a crude and calculating manipulator.

Halfway into the OP there's a bit about the author being autistic.
Frankly I first suspected the Autism claim was most likely just a lazy cover.

This thread actually caught my curiouslyfiendish attention right from the beginning, back in early January, and after summoning tfsf's resident law enforcement stooge, old cuntstable Cooper, I then fucked off to scope out this Cartoondude135 individual, who are they irl, does their remarkably precarious story even add up/align with any claimed activities elsewhere, eg: on a fora the author linked in an earlier post.

Barely 10-15mins into the spontaneous investigation, I'd managed to identify the author irl and glean a decent amount of general information.
(*Ain't gonna dox them though)

I checked out the authors other linked fora and couldn't find any content incongruent with the narrative presented here, so eventually contacted that fora's administration staff, asking their side of things.
Fuckin'ell, the admins over there were hysterical at the time, unwilling to talk, so I moved on.

At this stage, of course I am quite aware of the objectively extremely concerning subject seeming to be presented by the OP author.
Yet as far as I can tell, the author is genuinely Autistic and simply fixated on a specific point within the broader scope, I think the author isn't readily able to actually comprehend the precariousness the topic from a more common pov.
To me, and I'd like to think it'd be similar for most others too, this thread's topic immediately set off alarm bells. Initially I willingly participated offensively to a minimal degree. I had assumed we were dealing with an online predovore at first, though the more I looked into this author and their activities, my assumption has been replaced with a subtle sense of persistent frustration at the inability to help an Autistic individual out of a very serious situation which probably isn't acutely apparent to this individual.
My impression of the OP author, is more or less somewhat as that of an exceptionally/hyper intelligent youth, maybe around early to mid teens at most.