Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
Let me be clear on one thing: I didn't post any "CSAM" on the Lemmy servers! I'm protesting something that I feel is unfair towards the female human.

Please actually watch these before jumping to conclusions so you can actually understand what I’m really protesting!

Women Who Were Told Their Outfits Were ‘Too Revealing’
Mom Says She Was Kicked Out of Gym For Revealing Tank Top: I Felt Humiliated
Cops Dragged Woman Off Beach After Complaint About Her Bikini

It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit or body is “too revealing”,

Teens React After Yearbook Photos Are ‘Modesty Edited’

it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look “modest” for a yearbook or a portrait!
9-Year-Old Saves Family From House Fire

But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who’s around her? THAT’S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

It's all thanks to some videos from Inside Edition's YouTube Channel.

All these videos Inside Edition posted are developing a question in my mind that's getting the better of me: why so much hate on the female human - even as children? Like, why do they censor the little girl's chest? Can't anybody learn to appreciate the appearance of the female body?

And what's the big deal with nipples? I'm just trying to ensure everyone is treated equally regardless of race, and gender... AND age (after what I just witnessed). And if no one's gonna speak up about this, I might as well step up to the plate. After all, somebody's got to do it!

That little girl in the final video made two non-verbal messages clear: one: if a boy can do it, then so can a girl! And two: no one is too young for anything! As long as you have the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to do it properly and safely, you'll be fine. I was able to refuel my dad's car and cook my own dinner when I was 6 and without setting anything ablaze by accident.

However, when I try to illustrate with that video, even though Inside Edition is an official news channel, the responses I get back are rather bitter! They remove my post or ban me from the sites I post on for "promoting nudity involving a minor"!

WHERE
CAN
I
ASK
OR
SHARE
THIS
SUBJECT?!


Due to my autism, I only know basic English. So I need to illustrate to get most of my messages through. I thought hard, I tried, and low and behold, they were removed hours later mainly because they "didn't fit the subject of the forum". Even though my multi-subject based thread does have some material relating to this forum's topic. These sites and mods are all really stretching my problem solving skills beyond the breaking point for this one. I'm merely protesting with these pictures and videos as illustration. I'm not that good with words, so I need pictures to get half my messages across as noted above.

Many subreddits or forum sites don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I’m witnessing! In this case, the sentences “It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit is ‘too revealing’, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look ‘modest’ for a yearbook.” actually corresponded to several videos I beared witness to on Inside Edition’s YouTube channel.

I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won’t believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for “promoting nudity involving a minor”! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for “spam” - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).

So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I’m witnessing.

So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That’s what lead Lemmy.World mods to ban me for life for “CSAM” or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn’t. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site’s posting restrictions) is what lead to this “pedophile” confusion. So please help me talk some sense into the Lemmings world, Lemmy.ml, and Lemmy.world mods that this was all a major misunderstanding and Lemmy is pretty much the only reddit alternative out here where I can try asking another question. My attempt to appeal has failed on 3 sites - even after I tried notifying the mods on the third Lemmy server site before making the post, so I need your help now!

I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video… I thought to myself “That’s the last straw!” Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can’t? - In most cases that is? Whatever happened to "Free The Nipple"?

Children should have the same… rights to do things as any adult! It’s about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those “Family Day” episodes of The Price is Right and Let’s Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.

I’m not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It’s like racist people, but in age form.

Does it look like I’m laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos (I.E, "ghosting"), I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out “Can’t we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?” Yeah, the last thing I need is a vein-bleeding broken-record robot impeding or hindering my ability to seek answers to a question!

We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!

Stop trying to blame it all on me! None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, Inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them. If it doesn’t violate Youtube’s TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.

No one would answer! Not even Inside Edition themselves were willing to offer an answer when I even found their email address, the sites dedicated to helping those in mental, suicidal, or emotional distress (those forum sites even PERMA-banned me for "spam" - that's right, SPAM! (Even though there was absolutely no mention of a permanent ban or rule about "spam" in their forum guidelines!) Is that the definition of "spam" when I make a bad thread only once?! And when I try to appeal the ban, the same message "please contact the administrator if it was done in error" is blocking my ability to click the contact button! Or sometimes it's a blank white page with that message in the top left corner of the window! - Which adds more insult to injury, because I can't click anything as all the buttons have disappeared! That means I can't log out of that site either!), OR the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL let alone the entire topic itself! So I really am at a loss for thoughts and words on what I just experienced! And I highly doubt that ANY site will allow me to illustrate with a picture of the Napalm Girl (Phan Thi Kim Phuc) when she was 9, certain pictures of Pampers diaper boxes, Leela when she was an infant in the episode Leela's Homeworld, or even Belgium's famous kids: Manneken Pis/Jeanneke Pis. That, combined with YouTube having a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post comments on certain-to-random videos (I.E, "ghosting"), I'm forced to take more drastic measures to get my messages across.

But here's a strange catch: sometimes on some sites, Napalm Girl is censored, other sites she isn't. So I felt that I need to protest this.

It seems everyone is too chicken to even start this subject! Don't these numbskulls know not to judge a book by it's cover?! This is where I ask myself "NOW WHAT?!". This can't be one of those "exceptional" cases where they say "suicide never solves anything" doesn't apply to these types of situations. In other words, all hope for resolving these types of situations really is lost. I really do feel left in the dark on both the subject of sound effects and nudity!

Now please, help me lift my Lemmy server account bans as this is all just a major misunderstanding.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
Look at the videos below and you'll see Lemmy World mods are blowing this all out of proportion!


It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing",


it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait!


But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

I won't stand idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get this type of treatment for the foreseeable future! I'm going to stand up and set things right! I'm gonna show that the female should get the same type of nudity acceptance as the male! And from there, you get the rest.
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
Look at the videos below and you'll see Lemmy World mods are blowing this all out of proportion!


It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing",


it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait!


But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

I won't stand idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get this type of treatment for the foreseeable future! I'm going to stand up and set things right! I'm gonna show that the female should get the same type of nudity acceptance as the male! And from there, you get the rest.
🤨 You're a pedophile, or pedobait ain't ya!

Yo @TheRealJohnCooper check this deviant pos.
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
Look at the videos below and you'll see Lemmy World mods are blowing this all out of proportion!


It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing",


it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait!


But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

I won't stand idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get this type of treatment for the foreseeable future! I'm going to stand up and set things right! I'm gonna show that the female should get the same type of nudity acceptance as the male! And from there, you get the rest.
😂Ya best keep them beady little eyes off my avatar cunt!
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
Look at the videos below and you'll see Lemmy World mods are blowing this all out of proportion!


It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing",


it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait!


But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

I won't stand idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get this type of treatment for the foreseeable future! I'm going to stand up and set things right! I'm gonna show that the female should get the same type of nudity acceptance as the male! And from there, you get the rest.
IMG_20240102_173008_390.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
🤨 You're a pedophile, or pedobait ain't ya!

Yo @TheRealJohnCooper check this deviant pos.
I'm not being a pedophile! I'm just shocked they can execute this type of censorship too!

I felt this is the last straw and someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can't? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same... rights to do things as any adult! It's about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those "Family Day" episodes of The Price is Right and Let's Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
I'm not being a pedophile! I'm just shocked they can execute this type of censorship too!

I felt this is the last straw and someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can't? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same... rights to do things as any adult! It's about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those "Family Day" episodes of The Price is Right and Let's Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.
Ahh fuck off cunt.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
For the love of all things holy. @shiv this word you created is nice, but you have to do some soul searching on this. This is not funny to joke about.
I'm not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop.

Does it look like I'm laughing for fun? Of course not! I have to step up to the plate and shout out "Can't we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?"

We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
My Lemmy World account got banned for "CSAM"! I can't believe this! Whatever happened to the right to free speech?! Even just talking about this can land me in trouble?! This was never even mentioned in any of the Lemmy World community rules!

It's all thanks to some videos from Inside Edition's YouTube Channel.

All these videos Inside Edition posted are developing a question in my mind that's getting the better of me: why so much hate on the female human - even as children? Like, why do they censor the little girl's chest? Can't anybody learn to appreciate the appearance of the female body? - Especially the nipples? And what's the big deal with nipples? I'm just trying to ensure everyone is treated equally regardless of race, and gender... AND age (after what I just witnessed). And if no one's gonna speak up about this, I might as well step up to the plate. After all, somebody's got to do it!

It's one thing to say a girl's outfit or body is "too revealing", it's two things to photoshop out a girl's cleavage to make her look "modest" for a yearbook or a portrait! But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who's around her? THAT'S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE! Watch the video on a 9 year old boy, Tristan Cook, saving the Tennessee family from a house fire and you'll see what I mean.

That little girl made two non-verbal messages clear: one: if a boy can do it, then so can a girl! And two: no one is too young for anything! As long as you have the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to do it properly and safely, you'll be fine. I was able to refuel my dad's car and cook my own dinner when I was 6 all by myself and without setting anything ablaze by accident. All I did was copy exactly how my parents prep the work area before starting this chore!

However, when I try to illustrate with that video, even though Inside Edition is an official news channel, the responses I get back are rather bitter! They remove my post or ban me from the sites I post on for "promoting nudity involving a minor"!

WHERE

CAN

I

ASK

OR

SHARE

THAT

VIDEO?!


Due to my autism, I only know basic English. So I need to illustrate to get most of my messages through.

No one would answer! Not even the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL! So I'm at a loss for words on what I just experienced! And after this experience, I have high doubts that ANY site will allow me to illustrate with a picture of the Napalm Girl (Phan Thi Kim Phuc) when she was 9, certain pictures of Pampers diaper boxes, Leela when she was an infant in the episode Leela's Homeworld, or even those famous nude statues - especially Belgium's famous kids: Manneken Pis/Jeanneke Pis. And I get Coco is a female bandicoot, but her angel death animation cued on most death scenarios completely ruins the fun of learning about the female body! Like, doesn't anybody want to know why boys and girls exist? - Science-wise, that is? It's almost like the mere action of thinking about this subject can get me in trouble!

But here's a strange catch: sometimes on some sites, Napalm Girl is censored, other sites she isn't. So I felt that I need to protest this; someone's gotta speak up.

Speaking of which, I need to illustrate for the most part, but many subreddits don't accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! So how else am I suppose to illustrate what I'm explaining - especially audio-based content (I.E, sound effects (E.G, Wood Single Piece Fall PE113701))?

I thought hard, I tried, and low and behold, they were removed hours later mainly because they "didn't fit the subject of the forum". Even though my multi-subject based thread does have some material relating to this forum's topic. These sites and mods are all really stretching my problem solving skills beyond the breaking point for this one. Is there anything wrong with emulating something you see off of TV? Family Feud has actually inspired me to utilize this behaviour; I have a little habit of asking questions in the manner of a questionnaire or a survey. Mainly because, it's like different people have different reactions to different foods; I.E, food allergies/allergy testing. And some of those answers will leave you speechless and your arms hanging limp.

I'm merely protesting with these pictures and videos as illustration. I'm not that good with words, so I need pictures to get half my messages across as noted above. There just HAS to be a website/forum or a program of some sort implemented to support "a little bit of everything" topics. After all, the more the merrier.

This is where I ask myself "NOW WHAT?!". This can't be one of those "exceptional" cases where they say "suicide never solves anything" doesn't apply to these types of situations. In other words, all hope for resolving these types of situations really is lost.
There's one place you can freely protest this kinda retarded shit...

...it's called a prison cell.
 

CuriousFiend

Elite
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
1,163
No, just saying free speech can be a slippery slope. I couldn’t care less about trolls, but CSAM discussions should be completely band here.
Free speech ain't a slippery slope when it is equated with responsibility.
Seems like the way you guys conceive of "Free speech" is inherently flawed and open to arbitrary hijacking as cartoongoon has demonstrated in post #1, ie: disingenuously equated it with some kinda delusional - "I can say anything, no matter how irresponsible or utterly fuckin' perverted, how dare anyone say otherwise" -😏 obviously cartoongoons premise is hypocritical horseshit lazily concealed with dozens of ghey rhetorical devices.

It also does not appear to be a case of anyone actually discussing "CSAM"-(*¿assuming that = CP type shit?)-and rather a case where this dipshit OP is unwittingly stepping into the firing line.
Because I don't know of any active tfsf member who would ever tolerate this subject being discussed as the OP seems to be hoping for.
😂Shit I doubt even Joke broe stank would put up with this nonsense.
 

shiv

John
Administrator
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
13,687
For the love of all things holy. @shiv this word you created is nice, but you have to do some soul searching on this. This is not funny to joke about.
We are keeping a close eye on it

A discussion of the topic is very uncomfortable, but it is with the bounds of a Free Speech Forum. Anything more is going to be handled quickly and appropriately
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
We are keeping a close eye on it

A discussion of the topic is reasonable. Anything more is going to be handled quickly and appropriately
Thx for not removing this thread as I am running out of places and patience.

And some of these guys even encouraged me to commit... you know what.
 

Joe King

Elite
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Messages
546
Child sexual abuse material.
None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn't violate Youtube's TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.


It also does not appear to be a case of anyone actually discussing "CSAM"
Of course it's not.



As for the 9yo blurred out in the last vid, what the OP needs to remember is that in most jurisdictions it is unlawful for a female to be topless in public, and the vid taken inside the home became "public" once it was made publicly available. So you can't really complain about Inside Edition blurring out the girl's chest. Had they not done that and still aired the vid, they very likely would have already gotten into trouble over it.

If you don't want it blurred out, the proper course of action would be to work within the Legislative process to get those laws overturned.

Personally, I also don't see anything wrong with women having the same type of in-public dress code as men have to go by. After all, we are all (both men and women) are supposed to seen equally by the gov under the law.

A good example would be the High School yearbook vid the OP posted. If they are going to freak out over the tiny bit of cleavage those girls were showing, they certainly should have edited the pics of the boys in their Speedo's too. Would they have published a pic of a girl wearing a skimpy bikini bottom? Doubtful.

Edited to add: what I'd like to know is if the clothes the girls were wearing in their yearbook pics would have been considered acceptable to wear at school on a normal day. If so, why would it be an issue for those same clothes to appear in a photo?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 2, 2024
Messages
27
None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn't violate Youtube's TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.



Of course it's not.



As for the 9yo blurred out in the last vid, what the OP needs to remember is that in most jurisdictions it is unlawful for a female to be topless in public, and the vid taken inside the home became "public" once it was made publicly available. So you can't really complain about Inside Edition blurring out the girl's chest. Had they not done that and still aired the vid, they very likely would have already gotten into trouble over it.

If you don't want it blurred out, the proper course of action would be to work within the Legislative process to get those laws overturned.

Personally, I also don't see anything wrong with women having the same type of in-public dress code as men have to go by. After all, we are all (both men and women) are supposed to seen equally by the gov under the law.

A good example would be the High School yearbook vid the OP posted. If they are going to freak out over the tiny bit of cleavage those girls were showing, they certainly should have edited the pics of the boys in their Speedo's too. Would they have published a pic of a girl wearing a skimpy bikini bottom? Doubtful.

Edited to add: what I'd like to know is if the clothes the girls were wearing in their yearbook pics would have been considered acceptable to wear at school on a normal day. If so, why would it be an issue for those same clothes to appear in a photo?
EXACTLY!!! Why is eveyone so quick in jumping to conclusions?!

Two side notes: One: I didn't even include those video links in any of my Lemmy Posts, but I did include that exact same body of the thread shown above. Yet they perma-banned me for "CSAM" and when I tried to appeal the ban, they gave me this:
Hello,

you will NEVER be unbanned, you will NEVER be allowed back into here. You asked where to post CSAM. CSAM is **NOT** allowed IN ANY WAY!

With regards,
Lemmy.world Support

And two: I need to illustrate for the most part, but many subreddits or forum sites don't accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! So how else am I suppose to illustrate what I'm explaining?

Many of the people viewing this really are blowing this whole topic all out of proportion!

I feel wrongfully accused as a pedophile and I am owed compensation by Lemmy World along with the many other forum or thread sites that wrongfully removed my thread and/or banned me.
 

Joe King

Elite
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Messages
546
I have no idea what this Lemmy World thing is, but if they banned you for posting vids that Youtube didn't have a problem with, then Lemmy World clearly sucks. So why you wanna be there? They did you a favor by letting you know that their panties are in a wad.

IMHO, if it's ok on youtube, it should be ok anywhere.


Now, do what the man said.
Get an avatar faggot.

lol
 
Top Bottom