"Clearly laid out" "pull apart what he said" why don't we instead take what he said at face value? Or we can get on your tack and only take at face value the things we want to hear, and disregard the rest. The entire Q thing has been an exercise in trying to pick apart the meaning in needlessly vague comments, or deciphering the math for this # or that date. It was a farce.
Maybe you and I have vastly different definitions, but I'd say telling his audience that something is "bulls***" and a psyop is fairly meaningful, considering he was responding to something someone had posted in his chat.
It's quite a fantasy world some have concocted, q-land. He posts some random comment 3 years ago about a person who pops up in the news today = time machine!!! He makes specific predictions that don't come true = misinformation!!! Goalposts get repeatedly moved = have to show them!! In that kind of world, it's impossible to ever be wrong, to reach a point where his audience realizes their folly. Pulitzer said it in the vid above, and multiple people said it at Lindell's deal, there is no one coming to save America, not the military, no lawyer, no court, no auditor. I'd say that's a fairly meaningful statement, no matter what he said otherwise about Flynn.
All the while, things are going on in the world and in our country that are on a path to bring our way of life to an end. We're in a desperate situation, imo the most desperate moments in our history, and yet many are still clinging to a fantasy, that the military is going to save us (which used to be Trump would save us, then the SCOTUS after RBG died, then Pence on 1/6, for a while it was all the judges Trump and Turtle got through, the national guard would be in DC on 1/20 to arrest Biden and co..... now that all those have proven to be fool's gold we're back to the military, beg pardon I'm sure I missed a few saviors in there).