Without a doubtIt's only a matter of time to one of these escalates. I just hope the leader(s) of the groups hassling people are at the front. My guess they are the ones hanging in the back, they're not going to get their asses kicked
Without a doubtIt's only a matter of time to one of these escalates. I just hope the leader(s) of the groups hassling people are at the front. My guess they are the ones hanging in the back, they're not going to get their asses kicked
...so you intend to protect a constitution that hasn’t been adhered to in over 150 years? Sounds great and I agree if we truly lived in a constitutional representative Republic it would be ‘perfect’, but it’s not going to happen. Btw, secession is not violent and is perfectly constitutional by law. The original union was and remains voluntary and is not a ‘death pact’.Yup I intend to protect my rights, the rights of my countrymen, and The US Constitution.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
That's fine.You truly come off as
"Interesting" group of opinions....so you intend to protect a constitution that hasn’t been adhered to in over 150 years? Sounds great and I agree if we truly lived in a constitutional representative Republic it would be ‘perfect’, but it’s not going to happen. Btw, secession is not violent and is perfectly constitutional by law. The original union was and remains voluntary and is not a ‘death pact’.
Agree to disagree? If you can point out in your constitution where it ‘prohibits’ secession I’ll jump back on the ‘just wait and see’ train.That's fine.
It sucks you feel like your whole world is on fire
"Interesting" group of opinions.
Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree
WE HAVE A PROBLEM
SMOKE & MIRRORS
I dug into the AZ audit. The company that was hired to do the audit is based out of Virginia.
It's called CyFIR.
As I dug into their HR, I found their CTO (Chief Technology Officer).
As I am tracing his whereabouts all online, I discovered he is a vocal anti-Trumper. His tweets are anti-Right, to say the least.
So, little to my surprise, the chief technology officer of the company that was hired to do the Arizona audit, is a vocal anti-Trumper and professor for cybersecurity in Virginia.
So this audit is most likely going to turn into a smoke and mirrors show.
Oh... and by the way, the CTO also makes "sticker packs" on the App Store if you are interested.
Found him there too.
The above comes from a very reliable source.
When the rule of law means something differentThomas Sowell was right. We've gotten to the place where personal responsibility means nothing to some people. People calling their fellow countrymen cowards for desiring the rule of law while at the same time using threats of guns, violence, and calls for revolt to achieve their political desires.
Sad how much control the cabal has. Their ability to create division is at an all time high.
I'm sure the Nazis told themselves they were just protecting themselves from crazy Bolchevic Jews putting them in ovens as they rounded all the Jews up at gun point
I've explained it tons of times in tons of threads but it's pretty common sense stuff.Agree to disagree? If you can point out in your constitution where it ‘prohibits’ secession I’ll jump back on the ‘just wait and see’ train.
I hope they win the governor’s mansion and then burn it to the ground.I hope his parents win millions.
I've explained it tons of times in
Loot and enslave? What’s that all about? The property issue is easy, fairly compensate the property owner through eminent domain which is the way your government currently confiscates property. Just because one can argue Ole honest Abe did it for a ‘good’ reason doesn’t make what he did ‘legal’.I've explained it tons of times in tons of threads but it's pretty common sense stuff.
The Union is a compact between all states and it's enforceable by all the states. Besides the fact that we've settled this before, historically speaking, let's put this another way since we agree we live in a republic.
We would both agree that a simple majority in Congress or a single state can't vote to take away your rights under The Constitution. The same basic principle applies to secession. A majority vote doesn't remove a state and it's citizens from the Union. You can't take away someone's rights under The Constitution by force (secession) and The US federal government has the obligation to retaliate against anyone who would try to do so their fellow Americans.
If you don't like the Union then you're free to renounce your individual citizenship and leave. That's your right. What you don't have the right to is to force your political will on others by force (secession).
That doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the reasons secession makes no sense at all but another simple one would be if I'm a resident of Ohio and Georgia were to try secession, and I owned property there, that property is still mine. Secessionist can't just take my property and force it outside of The Union because they voted to do so (that's piracy essentially).
If you really believe things are that bad your welcome to leave by renouncing your citizenship but you don't get to loot from your fellow countrymen and enslave them on your way out the door.
We live in a republic of states not a direct democracy in any fashion. The Founders were quite genius about that point.
Also it's pretty clear you're dug in and I'm not going to change your mind but "the plan" to keep America together seems much better than the tyranny of mob majorities.
If you want to discuss it further start another thread or DM and I'd be happy to play along.
And how do expect to protect those rights. By voting in people that the swamp will allow in? You have to be one of those people who believe that cops and talk a gun wielding criminal into just laying his gun on the ground and peacefully surrender. Sometimes it takes force to protect. As much as I hate that it does, it just does. The constitution that you like to throw into every conversation explicitly leaves room for just this action. A well regulated militiaYup I intend to protect my rights, the rights of my countrymen, and The US Constitution.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
What he did was certainly more legal and made more sense than secession. He had a right to defend the US citizens and property in those areas that were illegally seized by rebels.Loot and enslave? What’s that all about? The property issue is easy, fairly compensate the property owner through eminent domain which is the way your government currently confiscates property. Just because one can argue Ole honest Abe did it for a ‘good’ reason doesn’t make what he did ‘legal’.
You can't take away someone's rights under The Constitution by force (secession) and The US federal government has the obligation to retaliate against anyone who would try to do so their fellow Americans.I've explained it tons of times in tons of threads but it's pretty common sense stuff.
The Union is a compact between all states and it's enforceable by all the states. Besides the fact that we've settled this before, historically speaking, let's put this another way since we agree we live in a republic.
We would both agree that a simple majority in Congress or a single state can't vote to take away your rights under The Constitution. The same basic principle applies to secession. A majority vote doesn't remove a state and it's citizens from the Union. You can't take away someone's rights under The Constitution by force (secession) and The US federal government has the obligation to retaliate against anyone who would try to do so their fellow Americans.
If you don't like the Union then you're free to renounce your individual citizenship and leave. That's your right. What you don't have the right to is to force your political will on others by force (secession).
That doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the reasons secession makes no sense at all but another simple one would be if I'm a resident of Ohio and Georgia were to try secession, and I owned property there, that property is still mine. Secessionist can't just take my property and force it outside of The Union because they voted to do so (that's piracy essentially).
If you really believe things are that bad your welcome to leave by renouncing your citizenship but you don't get to loot from your fellow countrymen and enslave them on your way out the door.
We live in a republic of states not a direct democracy in any fashion. The Founders were quite genius about that point.
Also it's pretty clear you're dug in and I'm not going to change your mind but "the plan" to keep America together seems much better than the tyranny of mob majorities.
If you want to discuss it further start another thread or DM and I'd be happy to play along.
Mind blown! This government in no shape form or fashion represents me. It only represents the mob.What he did was certainly more legal and made more sense than secession. He had a right to defend the US citizens and property in those areas that were illegally seized by rebels.
Furthermore imminent domain is executed by a government that represents you as a citizen.
To say a government that doesn't represent you has a right to seize your property and then compensate you what they see fit is tyranny of the highest order.
2A allows you to defend yourself and your property from tyranny not to impress your will on the government and all those around you simply because you believe your rights on eroding.And how do expect to protect those rights. By voting in people that the swamp will allow in? You have to be one of those people who believe that cops and talk a gun wielding criminal into just laying his gun on the ground and peacefully surrender. Sometimes it takes force to protect. As much as I hate that it does, it just does. The constitution that you like to throw into every conversation explicitly leaves room for just this action. A well regulated militia
...And it’s your own argument that this is an illegitimate government. So you’re telling me an illegitimate government represents me? Please explain.What he did was certainly more legal and made more sense than secession. He had a right to defend the US citizens and property in those areas that were illegally seized by rebels.
Furthermore imminent domain is executed by a government that represents you as a citizen.
To say a government that doesn't represent you has a right to seize your property and then compensate you what they see fit is tyranny of the highest order.
I've joked about the CiC being illegitimate because we know he didn't actually win but I've never suggested we live in an illegitimate government (because we don't) and Congress constitutionally confirmed him....And it’s your own argument that this is an illegitimate government. So you’re telling me an illegitimate government represents me? Please explain.
You don't get to just declare your rights are being taken away.You can't take away someone's rights under The Constitution by force (secession) and The US federal government has the obligation to retaliate against anyone who would try to do so their fellow Americans.
If ones rights under the constitution have been taken away by the government why not secede?
Yes, let’s leave it to the courts. Good thinking.I've joked about the CiC being illegitimate because we know he didn't actually win but I've never suggested we live in an illegitimate government (because we don't) and Congress constitutionally confirmed him.
You don't get to just declare your rights are being taken away.
There is a legal process to prove that and further recourses after that if you believe that.
If you haven't gone through all those steps and recourses than you simply haven't even tried to prove the claim.
Gotta agree with that... #JusticeCorruptionYes, let’s leave it to the courts. Good thinking.
Corrupt politicians and courts is kinda how it all begins...
We have rules, laws, and processes in this country even if imperfect.Yes, let’s leave it to the courts. Good thinking.
We have rules, laws, and processes in this country even if imperfect.Yes, let’s leave it to the courts. Good thinking.
That’s an empty argument! Just because this shithole is better than every other shithole throughout the world we should be thankful? Gimme a fukkin break!We have rules, laws, and processes in this country even if imperfect.
You're welcome to leave if you think it's so awful
Hang on here just a second, WTF are 90 people doing that they are dying by lawnmower? I get maybe an old dude has a heart attack, but 90 people per year die at the hands of their lawn mower? We need to get rid of a lot of the gene pool at this rate.
Looks like you're substituting your feelings for facts again.That’s an empty argument! Just because this shithole is better than every other shithole throughout the world we should be thankful? Gimme a fukkin break!
I had to look it up.Hang on here just a second, WTF are 90 people doing that they are dying by lawnmower? I get maybe an old dude has a heart attack, but 90 people per year die at the hands of their lawn mower? We need to get rid of a lot of the gene pool at this rate.
We have activist juries and judges beholden to political parties instead of the constitution. We are so fucked.This had appeal written all over it before the trial ever started.