Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
So wtf did it do? Implant a xenomorph alien in it?
Chuck 2020
2022 Fantasy ⚾️ 🏆
I think they just had sex.
Why is that even a thing?
Look at the illegals would vote. This whole imported illegal vote thing is more than likely going to blow up in their face
I get that but why are they even gauging it? Illegals can't vote. Cheating I know.
Jack Poso 🇺🇸 on GETTR : BREAKING: Source close to RFK campaign says he has not yet decided on dropping out and endorsing Trump. There is an internal war ...
BREAKING: Source close to RFK campaign says he has not yet decided on dropping out and endorsing Trump. There is an internal war happening within the camp with Nicole urging him to join forces with Trump and Cheryl Hines urging him to just drop off the ballot in swing states and not endorse
Screenshot that.
They are still gonna ballot harvest all of the new registrations.
Unrealized gains is nothing more than theft. The double whammy would be being charged tax on unrealized gains and then selling your capital investments and paying capital gains taxes on the same amount. Ex: House bought for $50,000 (basis) now worth $100,000 with $50,000 of that in gains. Thus, you pay tax on the unrealized gain of $50,000 even though you don't want to sell it. Then you sell it for $100,000 and pay capital gains taxes on the $50,000 profit. Looks like double taxation on the $50,000 increase, first, as unrealized gains tax, then, capital gains taxes on the same $50,000. Two different taxes on the same $50,000.
Re: Jack Daniels. These companies would never be dropping DEI if not for X and other social media not named Google, Meta, YT, or Instagram. If Twitter were still around any mention of DEI wokism or a DEI boycott would be censored.
Jack Daniel’s maker scraps DEI policies after threat of ‘anti-woke’ boycott
Jack Daniel’s maker Brown-Forman Corp. is just the latest major company to reverse its DEI programs after pushback on social media.nypost.com
^^unnamed?? A big time Dem perhaps, though in a Mitsubishi, probably not?
LI mom killed her 9-year-old son in tragic wrong-way crash that left several others injured: cops
The mother – who has not been named publicly – was allegedly driving the wrong way.
Family spent a year looking for daughter after hospital said she checked herself out — but she was dead the whole time: lawsuit
Jessie Peterson’s family spent a year looking for her after being told she had checked herself out — just to finally find out she’d been decomposing in a morgue, a lawsuit alleges.
Chris Cuomo rips ‘pay to play’ as DNC luxury suites go for $5M: ‘Same people they say they are going to regulate’
Cuomo told his audience on NewsNation that the suites “were filled with the same people that they say they’re going to regulate.”
I need the rest where he shoots them all
There is/was a liberal law professor (being redundant here), Sanford Levinson, at the U of Texas Law School who wrote a law review article called, "The Embarrassing Second Amendment". It's a very interesting read.
In the article, Levinson talks about United States v Miller, a SCOTUS case wherein it was decided that Miller, arrested for possessing a sawed-off shotgun, was guilty of violating the National Firearms Act by having a shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches in length. Miller argued that the gun was protected by the 2nd Amendment. The SCOTUS ruled against Miller, in part, claiming that a sawed-off shotgun was not a part of the normal military arsenal which the 2nd Amendment applied to. (We know that members of the US military and others have used shotguns in WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam and other actions. But, I digress.)
Levinson states, "it is difficult to read Miller as rendering the Second Amendment meaningless as a control on Congress. Ironically, Miller can be read to support some of the most extreme anti-gun control arguments, e.g., that the individual citizen has a right to keep and bear bazookas, rocket launchers, and other armaments that are clearly relevant to modern warfare, including, of course, assault weapons. Arguments about the constitutional legitimacy of the prohibition by Congress of private ownership of handguns or, what is much more likely, assault rifles, might turn on the usefulness of such guns in military settings."
Or at least dropped that fat twat
They're not voters, they're the United Nations army.
OPD77
Legendary
Charlie Kirk on GETTR : President Trump announces plans to impose tough new sentencing for illegal alien crimes: “This includes a ten-year mandato...
President Trump announces plans to impose tough new sentencing for illegal alien crimes: “This includes a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence for anyone guilty of human smuggling, a guaranteed life sentence for anyone guilty of child trafficking, and a death penalty for anyone guilty of child...
Hunter Biden’s former partner placed under investigation by Chinese government, resigned from fund
Zhao Xuejun resigned as the chairman of Harvest Fund Management after he was placed under investigation by the Chinese authorities.
justthenews.com
‘Third Rail’: Here’s Why Team Kamala Isn’t Peddling The Typical Dem Climate Panic This Election
Vice President Kamala Harris has been tight-lipped about her record on climate change while major green groups continue to support her anyways.
dailycaller.com
OPD77
Legendary
*testiculates
Tucker and Beck are caught up on the cabal, and that’s good, but years behind the LAC
OPD77
Legendary
His Cousin?
Lolzie
No. Wrong. Beck has had his personal issues, but has always been ahead of the curve. He called 911 long before and was a savant predicting the 2008 collapse. He is far more right than wrong . . . just misunderstood and mistrusted due to his internal demons he has now overcome. He is one of the best sources if you can handle his unorthodox style (which I happen to love).
OPD77
Legendary
Similar threads
