It's like they forget that A) Democrats controlled the House, B) Trump didn't write the bill, and C) there's no line item veto so he could either veto the whole thing or approve the whole thing.
And for good measure, let's throw in D) it passed overwhelmingly and a veto would've ONLY been used against him after the bill passed regardless, while delaying much needed aid for businesses that were laying off people and closing doors in unprecedented numbers (remember, unemployment exceeded 20% from around 3% pre-COVID In the span of just one month)
Oh, and let's also not forget E) that this was a major compromise that Pelosi wanted her caucus to vote against a it wasn't liberal enough, until Trump placed everything at her feet, including the blame for the delay. How, then, could have he vetoed it?
It's very easy to see the fools and the charlatans, although a little tougher to know which is which.
Which one are you?
I'll tell you what I'm not, a sycophant who makes excuses for Trump's repeated failures. Your point, if there is one, is don't blame Trump for bad legislation that he signed, because the deck was stacked against him. The veto would have been used against him? You mean the press would've treated him badly? Dems would say bad things about him? Trump gave the democrats another weapon to torpedo his campaign, via the stroke of his own pen.
Trump shut the country down, of course unemployment skyrocketed. Those businesses were in trouble in part because of Trump. The globalists fished in Trump as easy as can be. Their fake pandemic, shutdowns, vaccines, the whole 9 yards. The LAC figured it out pretty quickly, but for some reason, we shouldn't expect Trump to figure it out. The guy playing 4d chess who had a plan for eliminating the globalists was in reality a helpless fool who was easily duped into doing their bidding.
Sorry, I don't buy it and neither do a lot of other people. He could've drawn a line in the sand and fought. He never did. He hardly fought anything, other than his own impeachments, he just talked about fighting at rallies. He didn't draw the line on massive gov't spending pre-covid, he wasn't going to during covid. Just as he did nothing to ensure election integrity pre-covid, he certainly wasn't going to address it in the middle of the fake pandemic.
If one believes as you do, why would they vote for Trump again? If he's such a prisoner of the system who's helpless against he wiles of the globalists, exactly why would you or anyone else support him?
FYI, if he were to get in office again (he won't), but hypothetically speaking, they'd just spring another covid-like event on him. Gee, we'll have to forget this whole swamp-draining thing, we've got to fight some viruses, or aliens or whatever.
Telling me he was going to lose the fight is debatable, I believe he could've won, certainly could've rallied enough support to prevent a veto override. His refusal to even make the fight is what really matters. Cleaning the gov't up would take drastic, historic measures. Trump proved to us in spades he's not cut out for that. Especially not as the weak sister you made him out to be.