By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Exactly. I’m Gen. X and we heard the same bullshit. The problem is the rest of us are at the mercy of these satanic megalomaniacs. All they have to do when people start understanding the game is shake the jar and we all turn on each other.Typical boomer response to anything and everything. It’s all the younger generations fault right, cuz they’ve been running everything the past 50 years right
“If inflation is too low, or negative, then some people may put off spending because they expect prices to fall,” the Bank notes in its explanation of the 2 per cent target.
However, with year-on-year price rises still in double-digits, most of the Monetary Policy Committee have aimed to bring the figure down by voting for a number of recent interest rate hikes.
LOL. they are paying $15 for a dozen eggs. LOL.The Bank of England is asking the important questions. Like "is inflation too low?"
Bank of England interest rate-setter warns inflation may get too low
Silvana Tenreyro has been one of the Monetary Policy Committee’s most consistently dovish memberswww.standard.co.uk
Anyone here from the UK? What are your thoughts on the Bank of England making the printer go BRRRRRRRRRRR even harder?
In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed introduced a hodge podge of emergency lending programs to Wall Street’s biggest banks, as well as cranking out its traditional discount window loans. While the Fed released general details of what the programs were created to do, it did not release the names of the Wall Street firms that were doing the bulk of the borrowing, or the sums borrowed by each institution.
A tenacious investigative reporter at Bloomberg News, the late Mark Pittman, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Fed for the names of the banks, the amounts borrowed and the terms. Under the law, the Fed had to respond in 20 business days. The Fed stalled Pittman for six months, leading to the parent of Bloomberg News, Bloomberg LP, filing a lawsuit against the Fed in the Federal District Court in Manhattan in November 2008. Bloomberg won that suit. The Fed then appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. A large number of other mainstream media outlets and groups filed an Amicus brief in the matter, in support of the release of the information.
The Fed also lost at the Second Circuit. The Fed was, apparently, too embarrassed to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, because President Obama’s acting Solicitor General, Neal Katyal, planned to file a brief contrary to the Fed’s position, so a group called The Clearing House Association LLC, made up of some of the very same Wall Street banks that were being bailed out by the Fed, filed their own appeal with the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case in March of 2011, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit standing.
The financial reform legislation known as the Dodd-Frank Act (which was signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010) had forced the Fed to release the transaction details of its seven emergency lending facilities in December of 2010. When the Supreme Court declined to hear the court case, the Fed finally released the discount window transactions in March 2011.
On March 21, 2011, then Bloomberg News Editor in Chief Matthew Winkler released this statement:
“At some point long before the credit markets seized up in 2007, financial markets collapsed and the economy plunged into the worst recession since the 1930s, the Federal Reserve forgot that it is the central bank for the people of the United States and not a private academy where decisions of great importance may be withheld from public scrutiny. As only Congress has the constitutional power to coin money, Congress delegates that power to the Fed and the Fed must be accountable to Congress, especially in disclosing what it does with the people’s money.”
The Dodd-Frank legislation, thanks to an amendment by Senator Bernie Sanders, required the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs. When that information was released in July of 2011, it revealed that the Fed had sluiced more than $16 trillion in cumulative loans at below-market interest rates to teetering banks. (Just three Wall Street firms, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch, received $5.7 trillion of that.)
The GAO report notes on page two that the audit does not include the Fed’s loans made through its discount window during the financial crisis. Also, in a tiny footnote on page 2 of the GAO audit, there is this statement: “…this report does not cover the single-tranche term repurchase agreements conducted by FRBNY in 2008. FRBNY conducted these repurchase agreements with primary dealers through an auction process under its statutory authority for conducting temporary open market operations.” FRBNY stands for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – the deeply conflicted and crony regulator of Wall Street’s largest banks, which is, literally, owned by the same banks. (See These Are the Banks that Own the New York Fed and Its Money Button.)
When the Levy Institute of Economics tallied up all of the Fed’s lending programs, including the single-tranche repurchase agreements (called ST OMO or single-tranche open market operations) and added in the Fed’s dollar swap lines, it came up with a cumulative tally of $29 trillion in emergency Fed loans.
Mainstream media’s attitude about holding the Fed accountable to the people has changed dramatically for the worse since the 2008 crisis.
Wall Street On Parade is the only media outlet that continues to demand accountability for the former President of the Dallas Fed, Robert Kaplan, making million dollar plus trades in S&P 500 futures while sitting on inside information as a voting member of the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). (See After 16 Months, There Are Still No Arrests in the Fed’s Trading Scandal.) The Chair of the Fed, Jerome (Jay) Powell, had the audacity to refer this investigation to the Fed’s own Inspector General, who reports to the Fed Board of Governors that is chaired by Powell.
Wall Street On Parade is also the only media outlet to crunch the numbers and report on another multi-trillion dollar bailout of the mega banks on Wall Street by the Fed that began on September 17, 2019 – months before there was any COVID-19 pandemic that the Fed could blame for the relaunch of its emergency lending programs.
Another bank failure.
What about vanguard?I heard that Blackrock is limiting investors to withdrawing only 5% of their money per week due to a huge uptick in people pulling their money out of fear of property prices crashing and rentals going empty.
Haven't heard. Vanguard is more mainstream..Yes? Isn't Blackrock more of a selective fund?What about vanguard?
Something is going on behind the scenes.
The past couple months apes have been trying to get people to terminate plan accounts in Computershare and move all shares into 100% book holding. Shares held in book holding at the transfer agent are off the stock market and can't be used for lending or locates.
One scummy thing that we think the DTCC has been doing is using shares in Computershare as locates. What this means is when time comes to buy to close out a position they do a locate instead of actually buying it. They say "oh look these shares are available, we could buy them if we needed to, but we're not and we're going to roll over the short position instead"
But the thing is we aren't selling. The locate is wrong.
Pure book with no plan holding prevents the locate. If we're right and this is how it works, then this pot is starting to boil again. Another squeeze could be coming.