- Joined
- Dec 9, 2020
- Messages
- 27,242
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I saw where someone in Mass or NJ was thinking of running 3rd party. Sounded like a well liked dem. Liberals in comments were crying that he'd split the vote...
Reuters is a shit show of shit.
questions that ought to come from political rivals, not a comfortable sit-down with a journalist.That said, Trump is currently facing four of the biggest steaming-pile-of-judicial-dog-shit indictments imaginable.We all know damn well intelligence/FBI/DOJ would be watching the debates, hoping to catch Trump in something that they would then try to use against him in any one of the four steaming-pile-of-judicial -dog-shit indictments.Perjury. Inciting further “insurrection” or “seditious conspiracy”. Anything.If he were to call Pence a “traitor” or accuse him of “dereliction of duty”, would Pence claim “witness intimidation” and try to have Trump locked up? The reality is that it is not just unwise for Trump to participate in a debate with at least one potential witness. It would be legally reckless to do so. Which I suspect is part and parcel of the abusive prosecution in the first place. To frustrate his ability to properly campaign.And which I suspect might be fuelling some of the opportunistic critique against him. Some people want to see him make a mistake so they can exploit it for their own primary campaigns. Or exploit his inability to campaign as freely as he might have otherwise done.My unsolicited two cents.
The weaponization of the courts against political opposition is a problem. It has been tried several times before.That is where I'm at. People think these prosecutions will be done once they get rid of Trump but that's just a new baseline. From here on out Dems can attack pubs in court and nobody will do anything about it. We'll see how long people just let that go unopposed.
I don't know how we make it to '25 with whats going on. Something drastic will happen with the way things are trending.
I loose my mind over that error in grammaticalnessOr the inability to use Lose and Loose correctly
you can guarantee all you want, but you still do not have any concept of the the man was saying.I guarantee you I have more experience in all of those things than you which is why I don’t agree with you or some communist stan who said Ukraine would fall within a week at the start of the invasion.
The guy is a hack and has been proven a liar every time he opens his mouth.
How Russia Uses Retired US Colonel’s Ukraine Misinformation for Domestic Propaganda
For most categories of ammunition, the U.S. can provide support to Ukraine indefinitely.www.polygraph.info
Some people put shit just like it on the side of cars…Man, that paneling was crap. I remember it well.
How was that stuff ever used in construction with a good conscience.
It’s amazing to me that people don’t understand that hating Biden doesn’t mean they are voting Republican.Someone tell Scott, they won't be voting R. Probably go further left. And if they do. F em
View attachment 195227
he looks like a constipated penguin of sorts, in this picture
I’d never listen to him at this point just like I wouldn’t listen to Putin. There is no reason to listen to liars.you can guarantee all you want, but you still do not have any concept of the the man was saying.
Traffic laws apply equally to cars and cyclists. Cyclist did not turn in a left turn only lane. I ride on trails but use streets to get there. Obey traffic rules is the rule of the road.Of course I saw that. It has nothing to do with the fact that the guy who hit him is a worthless cunt who mistakenly thinks his Rights are greater than everyone else's.
We ALL have the Right to use the public easement, and we ALL have a duty to not violate other peoples Rights.
Bottom line is, the guy had a legally recognized Right to be where he was at. He also got there first. Do you have to yield to those behind you? No, unless they are an emergency vehicle. Then and only then, do you have to yield to someone behind you.
If you don't wanna be behind others at the light, leave the house a bit earlier.
The guy in the car? Yes of course he deserves to be shot. He used his car as a deadly weapon. A cop will shoot you for less.
No, it was the car drivers fault. When he applied (asked for permission) for a drivers license (license = permission to do what would otherwise be illegal) he agreed to be bound by his States traffic code. In that code it clearly states that cyclists have a Right to use the road (public easement).
Yes I ride, and yes I ride both off road as well as on road. Many thousands of miles per year, and for many years now. I follow the rules of the road. I signal my turns, I stop at stop signs and red lights. I use lights at night that as bright as your cars headlights. I love it when oncoming cars flash their brights at me, because then I hit my brights and they quickly dim theirs back down. As do I. I show them that mine were already dimmed.
In fact, I follow the rules far better than most drivers I see. Over the years I've seen so many poor drivers who just plain suck at driving, but who think they are the best drivers ever. Most drivers are fucking delusional and have a grossly exaggerated feeling of entitlement when driving.
If I had my way, all drivers would have to re-apply for a license every four years, including taking a drivers test that actually tests a drivers aptitude and driving skills. The test would be hard enough that only half of those taking it would be able to pass it.
If traffic laws are about safety, let's really make 'em about safety. As opposed to giving a license to anyone with a pulse and the money for the fee.