Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads


The Government seeks an order implementing a special condition of bond related to the Defendants' (Trump and Nauta) communication with eighty-four listed witnesses about the facts of the case, except through counsel. The Government conditions its request on the filing of the non-exhaustive list under seal. Defendants take no position on the Government's seal request but reserve the right to object to the special condition and the manner by which the Government intends to implement it. In the meantime, numerous news organizations have moved to intervene to oppose the Government's Motion to File a Witness List Under Seal, citing the First Amendment and related legal principles. Upon review of the foregoing materials, the Government's Motion is denied without prejudice, and the Motion to Intervene and accompanying Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice is denied as moot. The Government's Motion does not explain why filing the list with the Court is necessary; it does not offer a particularized basis to justify sealing the list from public view; it does not explain why partial sealing, redaction, or means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory, and it does not specify the duration of any proposed seal. The Clerk is directed to return the Pro Hac Vice fees to the filing attorneys. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/26/2023.LOL.

An attorney's view of this would be appreciated. @Jayhox
 
Old boy went from "sweep the leg" to Capt. Ahab with a taser. LOL




its-funny-hes-fat.gif


ok, she's
 
1687824650308.png


:oops::oops:

1687824773690.png
 


1687824994741.png

 
what a twat



 


The Government seeks an order implementing a special condition of bond related to the Defendants' (Trump and Nauta) communication with eighty-four listed witnesses about the facts of the case, except through counsel. The Government conditions its request on the filing of the non-exhaustive list under seal. Defendants take no position on the Government's seal request but reserve the right to object to the special condition and the manner by which the Government intends to implement it. In the meantime, numerous news organizations have moved to intervene to oppose the Government's Motion to File a Witness List Under Seal, citing the First Amendment and related legal principles. Upon review of the foregoing materials, the Government's Motion is denied without prejudice, and the Motion to Intervene and accompanying Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice is denied as moot. The Government's Motion does not explain why filing the list with the Court is necessary; it does not offer a particularized basis to justify sealing the list from public view; it does not explain why partial sealing, redaction, or means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory, and it does not specify the duration of any proposed seal. The Clerk is directed to return the Pro Hac Vice fees to the filing attorneys. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/26/2023.LOL.

An attorney's view of this would be appreciated. @Jayhox

She isn’t playing their hide and go seek game. She also based it on the fact that they provided no arguments to support their request. However, it was without prejudice so they can try again.
 
Back
Top Bottom