Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

ETNVol

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
4,205
Sorry but this is nonsense. We either have laws and rules and we are governed by the Constitution, or we are not. Black and white. If you take them to court and you WIN you set a precedent that can then be legally used against you. You effectively legitimize them. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

The country you're talking about no longer exists. That baby and bathwater are long gone.

We're mostly governed by a cabal of globalists, other than the freedoms we have in certain states, and make no mistake about it, they're on the move against those remaining freedoms as we speak. No, we don't have real laws and we aren't governed by the constitution any longer. Outside of those states, our laws are misapplied against globalist enemies, or not at all.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2022
Messages
153
Federal law generally prohibits disenfranchisement of people based on race, age, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, pregnancy, gender, sexual orientation and disability, along with other categories.

Federal law does not prohibit disenfranchisement based on ideology, political affiliation or outlook. If a state or local election system wants to block voters based on affiliation or ideology, they can…. as long as it doesn’t have a disparate impact on the protected category.

If a state legislature wanted to assign 1/2 value to each Republican vote, there is nothing in the constitution that would prohibit that rule.

If a state election outcome results in the loss of 50% of the republican votes in the local or state election, there is nothing in the federal law that would correct the issue. The state is responsible for certifying the results.

The supreme court will not hear an election controversy issue or legal challenge based on certified results from states. The constitution permits states to conduct their own elections, and as long as federal laws are not violated, the state certification ends the discussion. This is the great dichotomy within U.S. election around election manipulation by a state or local election officials. There is no federal recourse if no federally protected category was adversely impacted.

The DNC argues election disenfranchisement, rules, dates, times, locations, etc based entirely on protected federal categories, ie. the date or method of the election has an adverse impact to a specifically protected category of racial minorities. This is the typical DNC lawsuit.


Um, that's false. There is zero reference to "protected classes" in the Constitution. There is, however, a direct Constitutional ban on Bills of Attainder.
 

dirtytoeddawg

Legendary
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
3,181

Couple that with an RNC that refuses to act accordingly and/or doesn’t really want to win. RNC/McConnell gave up the senate just to spite Trump.

Hell, Kemp did more than McConnell & co trying to help win here & they pulled funding from Az to prop up Murkowski in Alaska against another R.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top Bottom