• Dance Your Cares Away/Law Abiding Citizen

    There is a New Fraqqle Rock Thread for active posting while the original 9072 page mega thread has been archived at Dance Your Cares Away. The original thread was maxing out the sites resources. The information will not be lost, but posting has been moved.

LAC Vol.1 Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Law Abiding Citizens first volume.
Status
Not open for further replies.
9cf005c4-ce2f-4841-a467-5ac28c142710.jpg


There are no coincidences
 
Makes me feel better about never understanding “modern” art.



Reminder that modern art was a CIA psy-op.

Former CIA officials came clean on this during the '90s, confirming that the agency used abstract art by Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning and others to promote American culture during the Cold War.

The intent was to portray America as a bastion of intellectual and creative freedom. This was to rebut Soviet assertions that the U.S. was "culturally barren", and to contrast the cultural confinement of the Soviet empire, where artists had been restricted to painting Soviet realism since the 1930s.

Abstract Expressionism was seen as the most free and extreme form of artistic expression - the antithesis of Soviet rigidity. Modern art therefore became a weapon in the cultural war against communism.

Beginning in the 1950s, the CIA secretly funded a group called the Congress for Cultural Freedom, through which it funnelled money to international art shows, literary magazines and operated dozens of offices around the globe - all with the explicit goal of promoting American Abstract Expressionism.

These efforts, coined operation "long leash", were meant to demonstrate to disaffected Soviets and European intellectuals that American painters were free to invent, and offend; unlike under tyranny, where "artists are made the slaves and tools of the state", as Eisenhower once said.

Paradoxically, at the time the works of Pollock and de Kooning were not even broadly popular with the American public, and earlier, more open attempts to promote new American art by the State Department had been widely mocked. Even President Truman famously said, 'If that's art, I'm a Hottentot'', when visiting an exhibit purchased by the DOS.

Because of this, and because it would have been impossible to attain support for such a project through Congress, the CIA's covert operation was necessary to push Abstract Expressionism in secret.

Do you think this had a meaningful impact establishing abstract art as a legitimate movement, or would it have flourished anyway on its own merits?
 
Makes me feel better about never understanding “modern” art.



Reminder that modern art was a CIA psy-op.

Former CIA officials came clean on this during the '90s, confirming that the agency used abstract art by Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning and others to promote American culture during the Cold War.

The intent was to portray America as a bastion of intellectual and creative freedom. This was to rebut Soviet assertions that the U.S. was "culturally barren", and to contrast the cultural confinement of the Soviet empire, where artists had been restricted to painting Soviet realism since the 1930s.

Abstract Expressionism was seen as the most free and extreme form of artistic expression - the antithesis of Soviet rigidity. Modern art therefore became a weapon in the cultural war against communism.

Beginning in the 1950s, the CIA secretly funded a group called the Congress for Cultural Freedom, through which it funnelled money to international art shows, literary magazines and operated dozens of offices around the globe - all with the explicit goal of promoting American Abstract Expressionism.

These efforts, coined operation "long leash", were meant to demonstrate to disaffected Soviets and European intellectuals that American painters were free to invent, and offend; unlike under tyranny, where "artists are made the slaves and tools of the state", as Eisenhower once said.

Paradoxically, at the time the works of Pollock and de Kooning were not even broadly popular with the American public, and earlier, more open attempts to promote new American art by the State Department had been widely mocked. Even President Truman famously said, 'If that's art, I'm a Hottentot'', when visiting an exhibit purchased by the DOS.

Because of this, and because it would have been impossible to attain support for such a project through Congress, the CIA's covert operation was necessary to push Abstract Expressionism in secret.

Do you think this had a meaningful impact establishing abstract art as a legitimate movement, or would it have flourished anyway on its own merits?

IMG_2624.jpeg
 



 
💣 West's only hope to end Ukraine conflict is to distract with Gaza events. Moscow could quietly win, while Washington maintains international prestige. Ukrainian forces lack resources to continue. Kiev must comply with Russia's demands for quick surrender. Result of West's reckless decisions in 2022, forcing Russia into conflict. Russian troops now dominate the battlefield. Western media's attempts to portray Ukrainian mobilization as triumph won't change the reality. Stalemate declared by Ukrainian commander. 💣


Subscribe to @BadVolfNews



📢 Russian forces strike Ukrainian military targets! Over 160 hits on Krasnolimansk direction. Artillery units neutralized, assault squads defeated. Support from air and artillery. Command and observation posts attacked. New tactics observed by Ukrainian forces. #WarUpdates


Subscribe to @BadVolfNews
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest

Support Free Speech

Current cycle
$268.17
Total amount
$890.17
Back
Top Bottom