- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 2,442
Is he destroying? Need updates.
Not particularly imo
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Is he destroying? Need updates.
He’s missing some succinct responses.Is he destroying? Need updates.
You ever heard playing a team and the refs , well that’s what you have.Not particularly imo
About as well as one could expect when he is taking on a rigged debate by fake news n deep state plants. She was given the questions weeks ago n rehearsed her responses for 2 weeks and made sure she was sober. Outside all that he has been ok. Not as good as he should have been though but under the circumstances it is what it is.Is he destroying? Need updates.
Started poor but hit her hard in the 2nd half.Is he destroying? Need updates.
Trump basically called Kamala a whore - "she put out". LololololStarted poor but hit her hard in the 2nd half.
Nice that's what we neededStarted poor but hit her hard in the 2nd half.
wouldn't be Trump's style...Trump probably should behave called on Vivek to help his debate prep. Vivek has a great communication style and argues with logic, which is the real fault with Democrat positions - illogical.
She knows the way!She’s going down
Word!About as well as one could expect when he is taking on a rigged debate by fake news n deep state plants. She was given the questions weeks ago n rehearsed her responses for 2 weeks and made sure she was sober. Outside all that he has been ok. Not as good as he should have been though but under the circumstances it is what it is.
sure, as long as you mute kamalamaInfowars is basically agreeing with you guys. It was neutral up until the 2nd half then Trump went into attack mode.
Is it worth watching? lol
Check this out. lol
Only if you want to listen to her excruciatingly fake scratchy bitchy voice for 2 hours. He basically repeated his rally points and occasionally got in a zinger, while arguing against her and the two media hacks. In closing he asked why she hadn’t done any of her plans for 3.5 years, which was a relatively effective closing. They’ll saw she dominated enough to justify the steal in November.Infowars is basically agreeing with you guys. It was neutral up until the 2nd half then Trump went into attack mode.
Is it worth watching? lol
I’m not sure what you guys are watching. She’s terrible.
Yea. They have police footage and a 911 call verifying it but a city planner said it wasn't so that's what they go with.Love how they called the Pets being eaten fake news.
2 things... She didn't do well. Nobody actually watches debates so the meme teams will set the tone over the next week. It's not 2012 anymore.Load up.
No. Waste of time.Infowars is basically agreeing with you guys. It was neutral up until the 2nd half then Trump went into attack mode.
Is it worth watching? lol
Full Debate Analysis:
Trump won convincingly, had a strong performance, despite going into a 3-1 debate against the moderators.
However, Kamala did not bomb, and did enough to keep her campaign alive.
The story of the debate is ABC showing their blatant bias in favor of Kamala, and weaponized their “fact-checks” solely at Trump. They let Kamala lie unchecked about everything from the Project 2025 hoax, to the Charlottesville hoax, and everything in between. The ABC moderators showed a clear and obvious hostility towards Trump, that they did not show towards Kamala, and in many cases, teed Kamala up to bash Trump with prepared talking points.
It is now abundantly clear why Kamala refused to accept the debate on Fox News, because her campaign knew she would receive preferential treatment on ABC.
Kamala also was well-rehearsed, which is unlike her, almost as if she had the questions given to her ahead of time. If ABC were willing to be adversarial towards Trump, why would they stop there? Why wouldn’t they give Kamala the questions?
ABC (Disney) just confirmed on national TV, that they are in bed with the DNC, and given their war-like posture towards Trump, I think it’s safe to assume Kamala’s campaign were made aware of the questions before hand.
With all that being said, Trump got the viral moments of the night, stuck to his gameplan, and brushed off the endless lies and repeated attacks, from both Kamala and the moderators. Kamala’s optics were terrible, with her constant smirking, making faces, emotional responses, and monotone phony tone. And Trump refused to let her get her viral moment.
Kamala’s gameplan was to appear more moderate, and blame Trump for all the problems she and Biden created over the last 4 years, but anyone who has been paying attention saw this for what it was.
Given Kamala held her own and did not implode, we can expect the compromised MSM to claim Kamala won, and the headlines will be about Trump talking about Haitians eating pets. However, the viral internet clips will belong to Trump.
Overall, Kamala did not gain any ground, Trump put on a solid performance, and the public got to see the MSM are clearly engaged in election interference in favor of the Dems. Net positive for Trump.
My money is still on no second debate
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...nd-presidential-debate-with-trump/ar-AA1qmkUO
Yeah, it’s hard to watch. Complete bullshit.I would rather they don’t.
It just gives the fake Kamala campaign a reason to pump fake numbers.
Trump will always get ganged up on by the moderators.
Let her go stand on her own bullshit policies without being able to deflect to boogie man Trump.