Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
9,931
Nullification is the answer. Cali and Oregon diaregarded Fed law during the DJT admin and not a fukkin thing was done to stop it. Abbott is nothing but a pussy!
Abbott is a Bushie and WEF member. Enough said. He's better than Beto despite his association with them.

Easiest study in the World, just find out who have been vaccinated vs who has not. If all have been vaccinated, there is your answer. Since we haven't heard, i would imagine they already know the answer. If it was about the same, it would be public to cover their asses.
Even today I hear some say there is no correlation between deaths of world class athletes, young people and others with no medical issues other than they got Jabbed.
 

CDDP

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
6,945
Well fucking do it already! Stop talking about it and DO IT!
The House already passed HR2. It fixes the border and more importantly fixes how Biden is abusing the refugee and parole system.

Call and or email your 2 senators and your member of the House and tell them to attach HR2 to this supplemental bill or government funding. Several members of the Freedom Caucus are threatening to shut down the government if it's not fixed.

Read the bill:

 

orng_blud

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 2, 2020
Messages
13,569

Republican's Conviction Overturned, DOJ Humiliated in Major Reversal​

Story by C. Douglas Golden • 13h

Andrew Harnik / AP
Andrew Harnik / AP© The Western Journal
This is just what President Joe Biden's Department of Justice needs for the new year: A high-profile conviction of a Republican getting overturned by an appeals court.

On Dec. 26, a federal appeals court tossed out former Nebraska GOP Rep. Jeff Fortenberry’s 2022 conviction for lying to the FBI, arguing the case wasn't tried in the proper venue.
 

orng_blud

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 2, 2020
Messages
13,569

Judge Drops Most—but Not All—Counts in Trump’s Jan. 6 Civil Case​

Story by Chaya Tong • 3h


Mike Segar/Reuters

Mike Segar/Reuters© Provided by The Daily Beast
AU.S. district court judge on Tuesday dismissed most of the civil counts against former President Donald Trump and several others for their alleged role in the death of U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died while defending the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Sicknick’s parter, Sandra Garaza, filed the lawsuit last January, alleging wrongful death, conspiracy to violate civil rights, two counts of negligence under an anti-riot law in Washington, D.C., and a claim under the D.C. Survival Act.

 

MortgageHorn

Your Favorite Loan Officer
Founder
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
24,174
lmk when someone releases the cliffs



1w0tn5kq5m661.jpg
 

Jayhox

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
5,044

This was actually expected. Shocked it is only one person who asked for the extra time.



Update : While much of this information has not been seen by many before, and is fresh information for quite a few, newly unsealed documents with the full #EpsteinClientList will not be released until at least January 22nd since Doe 107 requested a 30-day extension.It was confirmed by an attorney that many of these documents are new to the public. But the names that we want to see will not be released until the 22nd, due to a named individual wanting an extention for redaction.
 

orng_blud

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 2, 2020
Messages
13,569
This was actually expected. Shocked it is only one person who asked for the extra time.



Update : While much of this information has not been seen by many before, and is fresh information for quite a few, newly unsealed documents with the full #EpsteinClientList will not be released until at least January 22nd since Doe 107 requested a 30-day extension.It was confirmed by an attorney that many of these documents are new to the public. But the names that we want to see will not be released until the 22nd, due to a named individual wanting an extention for redaction.

and then - next time it is announced to be released, one more "named individual" will request a 30-day extension...
 

Jayhox

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
5,044
and then - next time it is announced to be released, one more "named individual" will request a 30-day extension...
Maybe. But they were all notified and given a certain amount of time to challenge. One person challenged so the court will consider the request. I’m surprised only one did and anyone else would be time-barred by the original deadline.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
1,624
Top Bottom