• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
They’re planning to integrate for the opposite reason than facilitating the Great Reset. If you wanted to do a great reset you would need a store of value which could at least in theory have the ability to be manipulated by a small number of people. Bitcoin and other cryptos don’t allow this factor, there’s no central database or set of databases that can be tampered with, that’s a critical thing you’re missing.

Bitcoin can be used as a currency in plenty of cases, Tesla now being the greatest example of a vendor that accepts crypto, not to mention everyone you ever got weed or blow from in the last 20 years.
This is where their crypto will come in.

It will allow them to pick value at will by creating at will.

Just because something is used in transactions doesn't mean it meets the criteria to be a currency. All cryptos are too volatile (especially while they remain unregulated).

Also cryptos don't really have value. It might seem like they do but in actually they are negative sum producers across the board.
 
Last edited:
This is where their crypto will come in.

It will allow them to pick value at will by creating at will.

Just because something is used in transactions doesn't mean it meets the criteria to be a currency. All cryptos are too volatile (especially while they remain unregulated).

Also cryptos don't really have value. It might seem like they do but on actually they are negative sum producers across the board.
You can’t create it at will

You need to read into it more I figured a LAC guy would love it since it’s the only way to keep Joe Blow asshole banker from keeping your all your money on a central server that he can just wipe whenever he wants
 
Last edited:
thats exactly what hes missing, theres no btc.com or bitcoin HQ to go to, its all decentralized
Correct.

It's all verified via communication between the nodes.

The 'decentralized' tag is just an illusion. It doesn't stop nation's from banning together to outlaw them and their providers via the net in their country.

All it would take is the US and the European Central Bank to label cryptos as unregulated assets funding terror activity and they're done. No person on either continent would be able to buy, sell, or trade with them.

Anything on the net can easily 'shut off' in any country. It might not literally end that crypto worldwide but it doesn't need to (just gotta end its ability to be traded and in demand).
 
You can’t create it at will

You need to read into it more I figured a LAC guy would love it since it’s the only way to keep Joe Blow asshole banker from keeping your all your money on a central server that he can just wipe whenever he wants
Yes it can be. They can define their own cryptos how ever they want.

Also if your country just doesn't allow you access to that resource it's no different than a banker wiping your account.
 
Yes it can be. They can define their own cryptos how ever they want.

Also if your country just doesn't allow you access to that resource it's no different than a banker wiping your account.
I think this is where is am. Way to many ways to corrupt crypto in the hands of the Deep State. Get back to a simple global gold standard. The wild fluctuations in Bitcoin alone should tell you all you need to know.
 
Yes it can be. They can define their own cryptos how ever they want.
Thats not what I’m talking about, how would they manipulate Bitcoin or a crypto that’s already distributed and decentralized in use given the design considerations? You can’t just say “oh they’re the deep state they can do whatever” that shows a really poor grasp of what crypto is

Of course they could define their own coins, but they can’t force mass adoption even if it wasn’t cost prohibitive to do so (which it is). They’re not gonna come out and say “hey guys buy gov coin from now on” and just go ahead and eliminate all the cryptos that exist, they can’t do that
 
I think this is where is am. Way to many ways to corrupt crypto in the hands of the Deep State. Get back to a simple global gold standard. The wild fluctuations in Bitcoin alone should tell you all you need to know.
There aren’t any ways they can corrupt it and again if you’re talking about deep state influence vs other currencies then that’s no contest at all
 
Thats not what I’m talking about, how would they manipulate Bitcoin or a crypto that’s already distributed and decentralized in use given the design considerations? You can’t just say “oh they’re the deep state they can do whatever” that shows a really poor grasp of what crypto is

Of course they could define their own coins, but they can’t force mass adoption even if it wasn’t cost prohibitive to do so (which it is). They’re not gonna come out and say “hey guys buy gov coin from now on” and just go ahead and eliminate all the cryptos that exist, they can’t do that
All they have to do is outlaw or regulate the trading on the ones they don't like and peddle an alternative.

Bitcoin would crash (they don't care because you can't use it anymore) unless you switch it via the gov (IRS) into their preferred crypto at an exchange rate they determine.

It doesn't matter how 'decentralized' something is because the government has a right to regulate anything in theory. Cryptos are easy to reg being on the grid.

Hard assets that they can't get to on the grid will never be able to be replaced for that simple reason.

I promise you I understand how cryptos work and I'm simply attempting honest discussion / debate on an issue that I think is VERY important for everyone.
 
Last edited:
This is why I'm planning a mountain compound.

My portion of Ohio could get super temp changes and too much water.

Tenn seems like the move given it's redness and general culture.
 
Brings something I've read to mind:

15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;

16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:

17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?
 
All they have to do is outlaw or regulate the trading on the ones they don't like and peddle an alternative.

Bitcoin would crash (they don't care because you can't use it anymore) unless you switch it via the gov (IRS) into their preferred crypto at an exchange rate they determine.

It doesn't matter how 'decentralized' something is because the government has a right to regulate anything in theory. Cryptos are easy reg being on the grid.

Hard assets that they can't get to on the grid will never be able to be replaced for that simple reason.

I promise you I understand how cryptos work and I'm simply attempting honest discussion / debate on an issue that I think is VERY important for everyone.
You can promise that’s you understand it all you want but you can’t still keep punting to the exact argument “oh they can just regulate it” and not addressing how difficult that would actually be to implement given the huge stakes big tech and corporate have in it.

Placing it in context too, I don’t understand how you can make an argument for anything(other than gold) as more resilient to deep state fuckery than bitcoin

Also I don’t know the nuts and bolts well enough of bitcoin hardware wallets to speak with finality, but I’m almost positive your second to last statement is completely wrong
 
You can promise that’s you understand it all you want but you can’t still keep punting to the exact argument “oh they can just regulate it” and not addressing how difficult that would actually be to implement given the huge stakes big tech and corporate have in it.

Placing it in context too, I don’t understand how you can make an argument for anything(other than gold) as more resilient to deep state fuckery than bitcoin

Also I don’t know the nuts and bolts well enough of bitcoin hardware wallets to speak with finality, but I’m almost positive your second to last statement is completely wrong
I've addressed it multiple times. It would be the simple part to regulate it.

Just because companies or individuals have a stake in it wouldn't stop them regulating it.

The positions those companies have would be used to support the artificial value of the new (peddled) crypto when they force the exchange (as just one option). It would be exactly what they tried to do with gold but 100x more viable because it's all already non the grid.

Crypto only appears to be outside of deep state fuckery. As soon as they choose they can manipulate the fuck out of it just like anything else (especially anything digital). Once they collapse the demand it's over and they can always artificially control demand via regulations.

If a crypto wallet is on the grid it can be taken down.
 
Last edited:

You'd think 4 years in DC and Trump would've learned that the divide is way more than a "handful". It's most of the senate republicans, and a majority of house republicans. His own freaking staff betrayed him and tried to blacklist Mike Lindell, Flynn, and Sidney Powell. His own VP refused to stand up and be counted.

Pretending it's a "handful" are the misleading words of a politician who's fundraising. He needs to get back to the fearless guy who called a spade a spade, and ditch every single person advising him, up to and including his bastard of a son in law.
 
Zooming in on the photo I'll break ranks on my usual Asian/Latinas and plow the blonde in the gold bathing suit with those huge tits.

index.php



She's just to the right of the far left palm tree in the forefront of this photo.



Edit: @catfishpunter Ask her if she's ever had organic-coconut oil rubbed on those "fun-bags" and would like to have the sects with a Patriotic Fraqqle-Rocker - I'll upgrade her to a suite with unlimited Vueve Clicquot and other niceties she may desire.
I'll be on the next flight.​
Nice you’ve started drinking early today.
36E0E1C5-8A53-4704-8903-A5A187485B11.gif
 
I've addressed it multiple times. It would be the simple part to regulate it.

Just because companies or individuals have a stake in it wouldn't stop them regulating it.

The positions those companies have would be used to support the artificial value of the new (peddled) crypto when they force the exchange (as just one option). It would be exactly what they tried to do with gold but 100x more viable because it's all already non the grid.

Crypto only appears to be outside of deep state fuckery. As soon as they choose they can manipulate the fuck out of it just like anything else (especially anything digital). Once they collapse the demand it's over and they can always artificially control demand via regulations.

If a crypto wallet is on the grid it can be taken down.
Tbh, The way you’re melding the terms digital and on the grid confirms to me you’re not looking into this at the level of technical detail that’s sufficient to yield a conversation that would get anywhere or convince me of anything different.

Your dead on that government fuckery is eternal, but that doesn’t automatically gift them a way to fundamentally manipulate the underlying tech. And this whole argument is just nitpicking a single thing unless you have an alternative you’re pumping in its stead.
 
Tbh, The way you’re melding the terms digital and on the grid confirms to me you’re not looking into this at the level of technical detail that’s sufficient to yield a conversation that would get anywhere or convince me of anything different.

Your dead on that government fuckery is eternal, but that doesn’t automatically gift them a way to fundamentally manipulate the underlying tech. And this whole argument is just nitpicking a single thing unless you have an alternative you’re pumping in its stead.
That's fine.

I've enjoyed the conversation and hopefully it gave others something to think about!

Appreciate your time!
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00
Back
Top Bottom