The planes hit the buildings. That’s an irrefutable fact. And the buildings began to collapse from the exact impact points. Again irrefutable fact. Now did we allow it to happen, the official narrative, etc all good questions. But two aircraft full of civilians, all who have families, relatives, friends who are still alive today got on airplanes with the hijackers and those planes flew into the World Trade Center. No amount of what-aboutIsm can change the fact that those events occurred.
Not picking nits here, but 'irrefutable' might be a stretch. Most folks didn't know what CGI was back then.
One could argue the reason the buildings started to collapse at the 'exact' impact points is because transponders guided the planes to that point (where they put the explosive charges?) Plenty of firefighter online video testimonies stating 'Explosions were happening everywhere.'
What nobody is discussing is why the government came down hard on the PhD (Utah?) professor who crunched the numbers and said "Hey, these buildings came down at free fall rates! Which is impossible unless demolition charges were used!"
He got fired pronto from his university. The MSM came up with all kinds of 'reasons' why he was crazy for 'suggesting' that happened. They totally ignored his posits. Even Popular Mechanics bent the rules of physics and came up with a 'plausible' explanation as to why 2 planes brought down 3 buildings designed to never be brought down by planes.
And lest we forget
Enron - one of the biggest financial scandals of the time? Building 7 housed ALL the files related to the pending court case regarding that escapade.
Ken Lay was CEO and he mysteriously died just before being sentenced. (if you can trust wikipedia - the 'editable' source?)
And lest we also forget Rumsfeld announcing on national TV the day before that the Pentagon couldn't account for $2.3 Trillion that went 'missing'.
Of course, if one were to rewind to 1999 and read the
PNAC white paper that said "...what we need is a Pearl Harbor-like event to get the American people to back a war..."
... and 'just like that' we GOT a Pearl Harbor-like event just a few years later... AFTER "W" was installed - remember the Florida chad episode and the SCOTUS weighing in? What do you think that was all about anyway?
Never mind that "W's" brother Jeb just happened to be the 'Governor' of Florida... i.e., they had 'their guy' in position.
and people associated with PNAC were involved with "W's" administration?
Never mind that Gen Wesley Clark made this comment:
"7 countries in 7 years"
After 911, when planes hit 2 buildings, but 3 buildings fell at free-fall speed, we invaded Afghanistan - which had nothing to do with planes hitting buildings that fell at free-fall speeds - but DID offer the military a starting point to launch an invasion of IRAQ and assassinate Saddam Hussein who also had nothing to do with 911 and hated Bin Laden, who also had nothing to do with 911.
BUT Saddam did trade oil for Euros thus challenging the mighty Petro Dollar (render unto Caesar what is Caesar's?) which allowed the US to create mayhem and destruction and regime change because Saddam (a CIA asset) invaded Kuwait? and don't forget Muammar Gaddafi president of Libya who announced his plan to sell oil for gold Dinars throughout Africa thus also challenging the mighty Petro Dollar (render unto Caesar what is Caesar's?) Starting to 'see a pattern here?'
Then there was the (false) "Babies being thrown out of incubators!" and the "Yellow cake" excuse for invading a 3rd world nation and massacring a million civilians - because we have God on our side and we need to bring democracy to these heathen savages....
Remember Rumsfeld saying "The oil in Iraq will pay for the war."???
I love it when a plan comes together don't you?!
I could go on, but there's way more to consider than 'irrefutable evidence' that is easily 'refuted' by facts.