Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

[AmericanViking]

Are all soccer players just faggots that couldn't hack acting school, but still wanted to display their gayness in the public forum?

This is the NBA now

 

[MortgageHorn]

 

[Jayhox]

What is your opinion on this case?

Brunson V CONGRESS - PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI - Alleging Breech Of Oath

That’s pretty damned solid.

 

[MortgageHorn]

Bugz! Bugz! Bugz!

 

[MortgageHorn]

 

[Jayhox]

 

[22*43*51]

Can you share that email? I'd like to send one as well.

Senator@ernst.senate.gov​

 

[LVRebel]

In for 3900

 

[Belezabro]

Senator@ernst.senate.gov​

I know how to email her office, I meant can you share the actual email you sent her?

 

[VosFrost]

What is your opinion on this case?

Brunson V CONGRESS - PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI - Alleging Breech Of Oath

Just read the brief from the Docket on the site.

Interesting read but I’ll file it in the “nothing ever happens” column.

 

[RollyInRaleigh]

Already emailed Ernst and told her she will be primaried.

Sent a simple email to Thom Tillis. “Marriage is ordained by God between a man and a woman...”It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God.” Hebrews 10: 31

 

[sanfordipa]

That’s pretty damned solid.

Search

www.supremecourt.gov

Distributed for Conference on Jan 6th 2023. How ironic.

https://www.counselpress.com/page_blog_single.cfm?bid=11

For those wondering if this will go anywhere.

 

[s-ou-thern]

Are all soccer players just faggots that couldn't hack acting school, but still wanted to display their gayness in the public forum?

 

[GatorOK]

Hakeem Jeffries elected as Minority Leader......hmm. waiting for updates on his extreme views.....

 

[AgEngDawg]

 

[RollyInRaleigh]

Are all soccer players just faggots that couldn't hack acting school, but still wanted to display their gayness in the public forum?

It’s why I can never take that shit seriously.

 

[CombingDesert]

Just read the brief from the Docket on the site.

Interesting read but I’ll file it in the “nothing ever happens” column.

If others want to read through it, here is a link to it on the Supreme Court website: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Here is a direct link to the Petition PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Docket...2243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

 

[orng_blud]

 

[Jayhox]

Just read the brief from the Docket on the site.

Interesting read but I’ll file it in the “nothing ever happens” column.

What is smart about this Petition is that it isn’t arguing the evidence of fraud. The Supreme Court isn’t a trier of fact. The Petition is arguing that Congress didn’t investigate over 100 accounts of election rigging entered into the record by their fellow Congressmen, and the fact that they refused to even look into the allegations constitutes treason because they did so in order to install their chosen person, Biden, in the presidency.

May not go anywhere, but is a solid approach.

 

[AmericanViking]

That’s pretty damned solid.

They could just rule against it and no one outside of people like us would know.

 

[Pineapple]

They could just rule against it and no one outside of people like us would know.

Or ignore it.

 

[AmericanViking]

Search

www.supremecourt.gov

Distributed for Conference on Jan 6th 2023. How ironic.

https://www.counselpress.com/page_blog_single.cfm?bid=11

For those wondering if this will go anywhere.

So they won’t even meet on it till then?

 

[Jayhox]

They could just rule against it and no one outside of people like us would know.

They will just be deciding whether to hear the case first. If they do, more detailed briefing and argument will follow. Or they can simply decline to hear the case. If that happens, you are right — it will disappear in the wind.

 

[Jayhox]

So they won’t even meet on it till then?

They will individually review it before then, and decide whether to hear the case during the conference.

 

[Pineapple]

They will just be deciding whether to hear the case first. If they do, more detailed briefing and argument will follow. Or they can simply decline to hear the case. If that happens, you are right — it will disappear in the wind.

Bingo. They will ignore it.

 

[AmericanViking]

They will just be deciding whether to hear the case first. If they do, more detailed briefing and argument will follow. Or they can simply decline to hear the case. If that happens, you are right — it will disappear in the wind.

They will individually review it before then, and decide whether to hear the case during the conference.

Thank you

 

[VosFrost]

If others want to read through it, here is a link to it on the Supreme Court website: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Here is a direct link to the Petition PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Docket...2243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

Does it list Alma Adams just bc she’s first alphabetically? I’m actually in her district so caught me by surprised she listed against a Utah resident.

 

[CombingDesert]

Does it list Alma Adams just bc she’s first alphabetically? I’m actually in her district so caught me by surprised she listed against a Utah resident.

The names appear to be alphabetical, so that looks likely to me. I’m guessing most/all members of Congress are included.

 

[Jayhacker]

I read the Petition. That is some bone chilling.. good stuff. What are your thoughts

We don’t have enough rope.

 

[Boxman4]

3900

 

[Jayhacker]

The names appear to be alphabetical, so that looks likely to me. I’m guessing most/all members of Congress are included.

Every dem and the rhinos are named.

 

[TopHook]

In

 

[RollyInRaleigh]

They will just be deciding whether to hear the case first. If they do, more detailed briefing and argument will follow. Or they can simply decline to hear the case. If that happens, you are right — it will disappear in the wind.

They will implicate themselves if they do not hear the case or hear it and rule against it...this could be very interesting. For what it’s worth, I’ve heard in other channels that it has already been heard and ruled on...we will see...

 

[Jayhacker]

So they won’t even meet on it till then?

Brunson says SCOTUS will make a ruling in Dec because of the lame duck status.

 

[imprimis]

Are all soccer players just faggots that couldn't hack acting school, but still wanted to display their gayness in the public forum?

You're seeing the same in college football. With hurry up/no huddle spread offenses, defenders are falling down in agony, helped off the field, and are back in the game the next play as if nothing happened. All about slowing down the offenses. Players should not be allowed back in the game for the remainder of the series if they are injured, feigned or real, and require medical assistance on the field. Isn't it all about safety?

 

[Jayhox]

 

[Thasubliminal]

What is smart about this Petition is that it isn’t arguing the evidence of fraud. The Supreme Court isn’t a trier of fact. The Petition is arguing that Congress didn’t investigate over 100 accounts of election rigging entered into the record by their fellow Congressmen, and the fact that they refused to even look into the allegations constitutes treason because they did so in order to install their chosen person, Biden, in the presidency.

May not go anywhere, but is a solid approach.

May be a stupid question, but does congress have a statutory duty to look into fraud allegations

 

[orng_blud]

 

[s-ou-thern]

 

[Old Glory]

Covid 19 vaccines and the misinterpretation of perceived side effects clarity on the safety of vaccines

In the era of Covid 19 and mass vaccination programs, the anti-vaccination movement across the world is currently at an all-time high. Much of this anti-vaccination sentiment could be attributed to the alleged side effects that are perpetuated across ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Some absolute gems in this piece.

"Therefore, if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine. This biological mechanism (the constriction of veins, arteries and vessels under mental stress) is the most likely cause for where there has been blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, dizziness, fainting, blurred vision, loss of smell and taste that may have been experienced shortly after vaccine administration."