Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
I thought the same thing when a friend of mine informed me of this....or the cock roaches feel comfortable coming out of hiding now that Pedo in Chief seems to be the man now. I would love for it to be a set up and get arrested on live tv.....one can only hope.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if they all ended up in chains at the bottom of a dark hole like in Solo?
 
It will come down to who is more aggressive. Lets face it, neither side is ready for a civil war, once blood would start to spill whoever wins early would have the other side ready to quit. A small percentage on each side would be willing to go toe to toe, but by the far the majority would say stop it.
"Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came." Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865.

According to Michael Vlahos, the expert on civil wars, the actual Jacobins are always a small group that want war. But it's the sense of inevitability that it's coming which filters through the general population that sets the stage for the inevitable spark.

I haven't talked much about living through 1968 and the horrors of political assassinations, riots and burned cities, every campus in America looking like Berkley and culminating in me being drafted along with thousands of boys my age. I really thought that if we were going to have a civil war that was the time. Somehow, with the control big tech, education, Hollywood and the media and the Dems have now, the present day feels more ominous. Pray for peace.
 
From Gab:

"
President Donald Trump now has “Standing” in the Supreme Court

During all of the efforts of the Trump team in court, the Supreme Court held that President Trump did not have a legal position to make his claim of fraud. They claimed he lacked standing – as Donald Trump himself pointed out.
Fox News today talked with Prof. Turley who asserted Trump has standing.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley told "America’s Newsroom" on Wednesday that President Trump "would have standing to challenge" his impeachment trial potentially taking place after he is no longer in office "and the court could rule on it."
This is now a new ballgame – President Trump has standing in the Supreme Court and the court will have to hear the case concerning the protests at the Capitol – that were protesting the fraudulent results of the election. It is impossible to differentiate the two. Our President Donald J. Trump will have his day in front of the SCOTUS who will now have to rule on the fraudulent nature of the elections – but now moreover will have to rule whether Biden’s presidency is legal at all."

I'm have no clue if this is reasonable or not, but thought it was interesting enough to share.
 
From our State Congressman Jeff Duncan. Give them Hell from South Carolina!!!

The double standards Democrats operate under are glaring. But the willful ignorance by the MSM to not report on these double standards may be even worse.

You are telling me that Democrats can object to electors from certain states in 2001, 2005, and 2017, but Republicans can’t?

You are telling me that Democrats can participate in constitutionally prescribed processes, like objecting to electors and impeachment, but Republicans can’t?

You are telling me that Republicans who objected to electors in 2021 are seditious and treasonous, but Democrat Whip Jim Clyburn and Democrat Committee Chairs McGovern, Pallone, and Waters aren’t?

You are telling me that when Republicans like myself denounce – full stop – the despicable violence at the Capitol last week, the MSM ignores the Democrat silence when violence erupted in their own cities?

You are telling me that Nancy Pelosi can tweet in 2017, “Our election was hijacked,” but Republican tweets on legitimate election integrity concerns are censored? You are telling me that Democrats can ignore left-wing violence and let riots and mobs rule their towns in 2020, and no one bats an eye?

You are telling me that Kamala Harris can post a link to help get BLM rioters and lawbreakers out of prison, and no Democrat says that’s wrong?

You are telling me that places like Kenosha and Minneapolis can burn, the federal courthouse in Portland be attacked, and an autonomous zone (where someone was killed) be established without a word uttered by Nancy Pelosi and Democrat leaders?

You are telling me that Democrats can say things like…

“You’ve got to be ready to throw a punch,” and “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country” – Nancy Pelosi

“You get out and create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they are not welcome here.” – Maxine Waters (on Republicans)

“Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople.” – Cory Booker

“When they go low, we kick them.” – Eric Holder

“There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives.” – Ayanna Pressley

“They’re not going to let up, and they should not.” – Kamala Harris (on riots)

“Fight in Congress, fight in the courts, and fight in the streets.” – Tim Kaine …

yet the media NEVER holds THEM accountable? Democrats can advocate for violence and go unchecked? Unchallenged by the MSM and the people? In fact, when words were spoken by Democrat leaders during the left-wing violence in 2020, it was to ENCOURAGE it, only ramping it up – not down.

Let’s expose the hypocrisy for what it is – even if the MSM won’t cover it. I will not back down, and I refuse to ever be canceled.
Spot on!
 
They don't plan to impeach him. That would require a trial in Senate. That's the last thing they want. They would 25th amendment him if he were actually to become President. Or @died him.
They would let the the republicans impeach him. A few brave democrats who happen to be in R districts will be allowed to go along with it. The dems official position would be against the impeachment. With a majority in the senate they can make the rules whatever they want.

Otherwise at that point (or before) they probably just get him to resign with a promise that it will keep hunter out of jail.
 
"Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came." Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865.

According to Michael Vlahos, the expert on civil wars, the actual Jacobins are always a small group that want war. But it's the sense of inevitability that it's coming which filters through the general population that sets the stage for the inevitable spark.

I haven't talked much about living through 1968 and the horrors of political assassinations, riots and burned cities, every campus in America looking like Berkley and culminating in me being drafted along with thousands of boys my age. I really thought that if we were going to have a civil war that was the time. Somehow, with the control big tech, education, Hollywood and the media and the Dems have now, the present day feels more ominous. Pray for peace.


I was 13 in 68, and remember the Nightly News was fighting in Viet Nam followed by fighting in the streets. There was a convergence of the anti-war, Civil rights, the cold war and basically everything in life. It certainly did feel more like a Civil War coming, maybe that's why it didn't
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom