Let's pull this apart a bit. The video was excellent -- and I'd encourage everyone in the thread to watch it -- but based on other comments Jovan made, it's not the slam dunk quote you want to be.
In the video, Jovan was also effusive in his praise for General Flynn. As everyone in this thread is likely aware, Flynn has very openly supported 'Q'. He is on video taking that digital oath that 'Q' posted. He is on video administering the same oath to his family. He even got is lawyers to say the same oath on camera. I remember Sydney Powell doing it and I think one of his other lawyers did as well. Flynn has also regularly supported Q in other venues. Flynn also seems to have credibility with many other non-Q supporting figures, such as Jovan, and, recently mentioned in this thread, Vernon Jones was looking forward to campaigning with Flynn.
Given the lack of any type of tangible results of the good guys appearing to be "in control", the current credibility of 'Q' would be tied to those public figures, in this case Flynn, knowing what they are talking about. This leads us to a few possibilities,
- Flynn is credible due to his high-level intelligence background and 'Q' is real, the goods guys are "in control", and we are watching the deep state destroy itself.
- Someone (or a group) convinced Flynn it is real and he is unknowingly duping others into believing it and thusly perpetuating the Psyop
- Flynn is a bad guy and is doing what he can to deliberately perpetuate the 'Q' Psyop by giving it credibility.
Regardless of which scenario Flynn falls into, it calls into credibility of either Jovan's trust of Flynn or belief in the validity of 'Q'. Either both have to be trusted or both have to be dismissed. I'll leave you to decide which that is. I am hoping for #1, but would not be shocked by it being either of the other options at this point.
And since Jovan is picking both supporting Flynn, while dismissing 'Q', it ultimately shows he doesn't know either.
A couple other thoughts:
- If you wanted to get information out, and you know many people wouldn't trust something like 'Q', and the world-view altering information overload that comes with it, you would give a lot of the same information the other channels, like Jovan, while simultaneously telling them 'Q' is fake. That way they maintain their credibility, while still disseminating the required information, but in smaller, easier to digest doses, to the broader population over a longer timeframe.
- At the same time if you running a Psyop, you would tell people that would otherwise revolt against this totalitarianism, that everything will change, but only at the precipice of everything truly going to Hell, which is essentially what 'Q' has done. This would leave no time to truly fix things before implementing the totalitarian society. Additionally, you would have spent four years ID'ing dissidents who are not likely to comply. And then you can take the appropriate actions to remove or mitigate them.
Essentially this 'Q' stuff best be real, or there is a decent chance we are too far down the road to meaningfully fix things. The Arizona audit information going to the Arizona Senate this week is the last real chance of bringing meaningful change in the near future. If that isn't successful, things could get dicey.
The timing of the Afghanistan shit show lining up to take the news cycle away from Arizona helps give Arizona more credibility. Timing the Cyber Symposium for the week prior to Arizona appears to help set the table for bringing this all top of mind, so that would likely explain why the held until last week for that, as much (most?) of that information was not new, although it was good information (however disorganized the actual event seemed to be).
So I don't know, you don't know, Jovan doesn't know. Hopefully good things happen soon, -- like this week -- if not get involved as you are able, but if the bad guys truly control everything... well fuck us.