Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

AMSO

Elite
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
136
From another thread which claimed this is an actual pic. Looks like what would have to happen to max out the airlift.

eac9a4fe3fa3143b56460cb47d3ecb45.jpg


If one counts like rows and columns of heads you can get to 400 ( I got 35 x 10 first go, maybe 35 x11 or 12).

Still not 800, maybe 400.

Give it a try and see.

The payload of the C-17 can handle the weight (good estimate with nearly half being small children is 75-100klb, including some backpacks - max payload is like 170klb) but would likely need aerial refuel after taking off at the high elevation of AFG and the sheer weight of all these passengers.
As you know, Center of gravity/distribution of weight is the biggest factor here. With the weight being spread out so much, center of gravity wont affect the lift vectors which is obviously the most important thing. High hot and humid are the biggest things that affect take off efficiency. This will earn some people some air medals for sure..
 

dirty0222

Guest
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
112
10 pages behind again. I love the military but hate its leaders. Such a shit show! At the pace we were going we would have only needed to be there for another 167 years. But we should stay. If it takes 2 weeks to take back the country? What were we even doing? Don't answer I already know.

Again The MSM and establishment are the enemy of the republic.
 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,786
The Texas Supreme Court ruling is only temporary for 2 weeks. DCJudge Clay "the Moron" Jenkins is suing Abbott and Paxton in District Court thus one reason he is ignoring the Supremes. Among the other reasons is they are 9-0 GOP Justices.

All the large cities in Texas are run by Socialibdems, many put there by Soros' $$ and the 95% who only vote dem. One person on Nextdoor, I know I know, is engaging a lawyer to sue both Abbott and Paxton over Wuhan.
 
Last edited:

RKirkD

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
1,013


That’s more votes than she would have received in an election ~6500.

In comments I read that she’s Not native born born and neither were her parents so she’s not eligible? No fake US born birth certificate? Is that accurate? Holy shot at thought of president Pelosi. Dear lord give us the strength to get thru this.
 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,786


That’s more votes than she would have received in an election ~6500.

In comments I read that she’s Not native born born and neither were her parents so she’s not eligible? No fake US born birth certificate? Is that accurate? Holy shot at thought of president Pelosi. Dear lord give us the strength to get thru this.

Wasn't Pelosi going to be gone in 2 weeks?
 

Shaun52

SCAR Cawk Connoisseur
Founder
Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
3,031


That’s more votes than she would have received in an election ~6500.

In comments I read that she’s Not native born born and neither were her parents so she’s not eligible? No fake US born birth certificate? Is that accurate? Holy shot at thought of president Pelosi. Dear lord give us the strength to get thru this.

Why isn’t she eligible?
 

Scratchmyvolsroughly

Elite
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
900
We've were told 60,000 (or whatever absurd # they were using) sealed indictments were about to drop 4 years ago. It was all a farce, from the beginning, designed to keep people waiting for lawyers or generals to save the U.S..

this is why folks get pissed at you. You are in a thread that supports this theory. Even if none of it’s true, though I think it is, you gain nothing in this world by proving people wrong and gloating. You bring religious quotes then you behave like this. Can’t have both ways and still sit on you all knowing smug throne
 

Long Cat V2.0

Legendary
Joined
May 20, 2021
Messages
2,269
From another thread which claimed this is an actual pic. Looks like what would have to happen to max out the airlift.

eac9a4fe3fa3143b56460cb47d3ecb45.jpg


If one counts like rows and columns of heads you can get to 400 ( I got 35 x 10 first go, maybe 35 x11 or 12).

Still not 800, maybe 400.

Give it a try and see.

The payload of the C-17 can handle the weight (good estimate with nearly half being small children is 75-100klb, including some backpacks - max payload is like 170klb) but would likely need aerial refuel after taking off at the high elevation of AFG and the sheer weight of all these passengers.
That picture is 670 people per this article. So add the actual capacity of the plane to that picture.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...-kabul-aboard-a-single-c-17-cargo-jet-reports
 

Fmoshermw

Elite
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
934
As you know, Center of gravity/distribution of weight is the biggest factor here. With the weight being spread out so much, center of gravity wont affect the lift vectors which is obviously the most important thing. High hot and humid are the biggest things that affect take off efficiency. This will earn some people some air medals for sure..
Yes. Definitely. the wya they are spread out as you say constitutes a "distributed load" which is fine in terms of not moving the CG out of range.

The CG has an operational range it needs to stay within for the aircraft to be stable. Also to be able to, "unstick" the nose gear and aircraft on rotation during takeoff. At the slower speeds of takeoff, the elevator is far less effective (goes down with V^2) than at speed. The elevator is what provides the moment to rotate the aircraft on the ground to get enough angle of attack to actually fly.

The C-17 is fly by wire so it likely has a fairly large CG range as the computer itself can stabilize the aircraft.

Only concern I had was that pic was taken from the cockpit facing back. Lots of those people at the rear of the aircraft are on the ramp.

The loadmaster likely had to do some quick math to be sure that particular load-out was still OK. Not a C-17 guy but that would strike me as highly unusual.
 

Shaun52

SCAR Cawk Connoisseur
Founder
Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
3,031
this is why folks get pissed at you. You are in a thread that supports this theory. Even if none of it’s true, though I think it is, you gain nothing in this world by proving people wrong and gloating. You bring religious quotes then you behave like this. Can’t have both ways and still sit on you all knowing smug throne
Asshat won’t answer. He will block you and keep on his antics. Soon he won’t have any one to converse with…oh wait
 

Encarnacion

Luchador Campeon
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
1,436
Been wondering about the symposium, what’s the real purpose? Maybe to catch DS actors while also revealing enough to bolster forensic audits in all states. From Telegram:

Remember the time line of what happened here.

1) Merritt, Wiebe and others on the cyber forensic team were given only a tiny slice of the supposed pcap data to interrogate. 2) By the close of Day 2, Merritt and Wiebe are talking to a Washington Times reporter and telling him Lindell's pcaps cannot prove what he claims they do. 3) Then on Day 3, after that Washington Times story has run, Col. Waldron comes out with a very carefully worded statement that reveals Merritt and Wiebe weren't really given any real packet captures to look at. What does that tell you?
 

ttyh

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
5,110
Catching up from falling several pages behind over the weekend and damn if I'm not handing out more angry faces than ever. Literally everything is failing at the moment. Will someone stick their finger in the dyke? We need a sign that good guys are in charge soon or I'm afraid things will just continue to worsen. LACs need some positive news for our country.
 

ChingChongDingDong

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
2,052
This has been known for 15+ years. We took the opium, then 5 or 6 years later the opioid crisis that targeted our youth started.

China has been mining the rare earth metals.

Kinda curious how China took the WTC metal before it could be investigated after 9/11, and then cleaned up the spoils of war without boots on the ground, and while our people(youth) were being poisoned.

All roads lead back to China.
 

CombingDesert

We ain't found shit!
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
138
"Q is bull****! It is one of the most sophisticated psychological psyops ever put on social media. That's why nothing has happened....."

"There is no military going to come in and take everything over. There is only you and me."
Let's pull this apart a bit. The video was excellent -- and I'd encourage everyone in the thread to watch it -- but based on other comments Jovan made, it's not the slam dunk quote you want it to be.

In the video, Jovan was also effusive in his praise for General Flynn. As everyone in this thread is likely aware, Flynn has very openly supported 'Q'. He is on video taking that digital oath that 'Q' posted. He is on video administering the same oath to his family. He even got is lawyers to say the same oath on camera. I remember Sydney Powell doing it and I think one of his other lawyers did as well. Flynn has also regularly supported Q in other venues. Flynn also seems to have credibility with many other non-Q supporting figures, such as Jovan, and, recently mentioned in this thread, Vernon Jones was looking forward to campaigning with Flynn.

Given the lack of any type of tangible results of the good guys appearing to be "in control", the current credibility of 'Q' would be tied to those public figures, in this case Flynn, knowing what they are talking about. This leads us to a few possibilities,
  1. Flynn is credible due to his high-level intelligence background and 'Q' is real, the goods guys are "in control", and we are watching the deep state destroy itself.
  2. Someone (or a group) convinced Flynn it is real and he is unknowingly duping others into believing it and thusly perpetuating the Psyop
  3. Flynn is a bad guy and is doing what he can to deliberately perpetuate the 'Q' Psyop by giving it credibility.
Regardless of which scenario Flynn falls into, it calls into question the credibility of either Jovan's trust of Flynn or belief in the validity of 'Q'. Either both have to be trusted or both have to be dismissed. I'll leave you to decide which that is. I am hoping for #1, but would not be shocked by it being either of the other options at this point. And since Jovan is picking both supporting Flynn, while dismissing 'Q', it ultimately shows he doesn't know either.

A couple other thoughts:
  1. If you wanted to get information out, and you know many people wouldn't trust something like 'Q', and the world-view altering information overload that comes with it, you would give a lot of the same information through other channels, like Jovan, while simultaneously telling them 'Q' is fake. That way they maintain their credibility, while still disseminating the required information, but in smaller, easier to digest doses, to the broader population over a longer timeframe.
  2. At the same time if you are running a Psyop, you would tell people that would otherwise revolt against this totalitarianism, that everything will change, but only at the precipice of everything truly going to Hell, which is essentially what 'Q' has done. This would leave no time to truly fix things before implementing the totalitarian society. Additionally, you would have spent four years ID'ing dissidents who are not likely to comply. And then you can take the appropriate actions to remove or mitigate them.
Essentially this 'Q' stuff best be real, or there is a decent chance we are too far down the road to meaningfully fix things. The Arizona audit information going to the Arizona Senate this week is the last real chance of bringing meaningful change in the near future. If that isn't successful, things could get dicey.

The timing of the Afghanistan shit show lining up to take the news cycle away from Arizona helps give Arizona more credibility. Timing the Cyber Symposium for the week prior to Arizona appears to help set the table for bringing this all top of mind, so that would likely explain why they held until last week for that event, as much (most?) of that information was not new, although it was good information (however disorganized the actual event seemed to be).

So I don't know, you don't know, Jovan doesn't know. Hopefully good things happen soon, -- like this week -- if not get involved as you are able, but if the bad guys truly control everything... well fuck us.
 
Last edited:

muchandmore

Elite
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
188
this is why folks get pissed at you. You are in a thread that supports this theory. Even if none of it’s true, though I think it is, you gain nothing in this world by proving people wrong and gloating. You bring religious quotes then you behave like this. Can’t have both ways and still sit on you all knowing smug throne
At this point the score is:

Deep State: 999,999 (they rolled the score)
Patriots: -144

Nobody is working behind the scenes for us. We had one shot and it was Donald and see how hostile all the pubs are to him now that he's out of office and all of his policies have been overturned. Don was hesitant to wield his power to remove the DS as where the DS is shameless and will consider every option including treason to retain power. They hold the reigns of every major agency, cabinet and apparently the Supreme Court considering the shitbag rulings they've been producing lately.

If you can read the following and think for a heartbeat that John Durham is on your side then I don't know what the fvck to say to you.

WASHINGTON, DC] – U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, applauded Judiciary Committee approval of John H. Durham’s nomination to serve as U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut. Durham’s nomination was approved by the Judiciary Committee today by voice vote, and now proceeds to the full Senate for consideration. Blumenthal and U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) recommended Durham’s nomination to President Trump last year.

“I know John Durham well, having known and worked with him over many years,” said Blumenthal. “He is a no-nonsense, fierce, fair career prosecutor. He knows what it means to try some of the toughest cases against career criminals. He knows what it means to try to stop the opioid crisis in this country. He knows what organized crime does to the fabric of our society. He is exactly the kind of person we should have in this position.”

lank


Approval of Durham puts your right there with one o the most vile members of the Democrat party.
 
Top Bottom