By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!ZFG. Bless @thenick_ttu for coming up with auto response for rubeI mean....at least wait a couple days and try to act like you thought of it.
I can tell zfg. Not even trying.ZFG. Bless @thenick_ttu for coming up with auto response for rube
I have the intention of doxing you. Do something about it faggotI can tell zfg. Not even trying.
No you bloody nitwit, "transwomen" are just delusional men who have been falsely "encouraged"-(abused)-by other dysfunctional individuals and have gone too far, instead of being afforded proper treatment and being properly helped.Bigots are disgusting! It’s already bad enough they are referred to as “trans women” when they are just women.
Do something about your intention? What the fuck does that even mean you fucking tard?I have the intention of doxing you. Do something about it faggot.
She should have spoke up before it got that far.
She probably did but would very likely have been met with the now prolific, feralized virtue signaling and covert aggression disguised as morally appropriate behaviour. She was most likely attacked, shamed and ultimately disregarded.She should have spoke up before it got that far.
Disney World is making itself into a "fairyland pariah" instead of a magic kingdom. Maybe a hurricane will blow them all to fantasy land.
What's a woman?Bigots are disgusting! It’s already bad enough they are referred to as “trans women” when they are just women.
I have the intention of doxing you. Do something about it faggot
Good point. I do respect a man that is transparentHe has already shown everyone his butthole. Doubt he has much more to hide.
A person that identifies as a woman.What's a woman?
I’ve got me fingers crossedDisney World is making itself into a "fairyland pariah" instead of a magic kingdom. Maybe a hurricane will blow them all to fantasy land.
A person that identifies as a woman.
Being a woman is a social construct. It has nothing to do with science.So, you're a science denier......got it.
Being a woman is a social construct. It has nothing to do with science.
Being a woman isn’t science at all. A person’s chromosomes don’t define their gender. Their chromosomes are just that and their gender is a product of their social identity. Two completely separate issues.I wonder why the Supreme Court Justice nominee said she couldn't answer what is a woman because she isn't a "biologist." Actually, I do know. What some you tend to get confused about is that being a trans woman is a social construct only to an intolerant section of society that insist on defying logic. Being a woman is science. Confusing the two is denying science. Its not rocket surgery we're talking here.
Being a woman isn’t science at all. A person’s chromosomes don’t define their gender. Their chromosomes are just that and their gender is a product of their social identity. Two completely separate issues.
Testicles don’t define someone’s gender either.A person's chromosomes definitively defines what a woman is. I could identify myself as a Shetland pony but that doesn't make it so. If a person chooses to "identify" as the opposite sex of what their chromosomes indicate then they're simply in a fvcked up state of mind.
Fred can throw a dress, call himself Sally and next month get testicular cancer. Why? Because Fred was never a woman and was only fvcked in the head thinking any different. Its only in today's screwed up culture that this kind of nonsensical way of thinking is accepted by many but most realize the silliness of it all.
Hi Rube ... I understand what your saying here and have no qualms about it. I also think some of the comparisons in various responses are unparalleled admits resistance to the challenges/discomfort that such divergence typically present. I actually lean more towards an evolutionary mindset not bound by legal dogma as is to science and relgion with both those forms of seeing being the basis of societal thinking and conditioning. Both constructs of being a man and or a women carries enough hang ups in their own right. Know thy place ... etcBeing a woman is a social construct. It has nothing to do with science.
Science is science.Hi Rube ... I understand what your saying here and have no qualms about it. I also think some of the comparisons in various responses are unparalleled admits resistance to the challenges/discomfort that such divergence typically present. I actually lean more towards an evolutionary mindset not bound by legal dogma as is to science and relgion with both those forms of seeing being the basis of societal thinking and conditioning. Both constructs of being a man and or a women carries enough hang ups in their own right. Know thy place ... etc
Would It be closer to the mark to suggest that when you state that science has nothing to do with it, that your not denying science but simply meaning that your insights on that matter deal more with an unconventional state of being?
I'm going to assume that your already aware regarding the flaws of overidentification to any persona as that relates to escapism in a world full of separatism. My context being one of a group mentality that overidentifies leading to a victim state. Examples: Ethnicity (embodies resistance on a national level / hive mind) / Minority groups such as race and creed dictating one's identity primarily based on appearance often subject to a bias that's typically skin deep. The latter often presetting of form of ignorance on both sides of the fence.
So if we are to discount that notion that one is not hung up on such things like say others that go banging a drum (which you do not strike me as doing) in need of regular medicating and continual psychiatric assessments, then 100% why should your views or way of being - be up for debate? Now there's a question!
I think we both have a good idea on why such takes place. So you see my video in gest above is not to demean but was more to highlight most of the above.
Glad you your here. Take care and be as you wish to be. I more or less know exactly what you mean. Humanity has a LONG way to go - but with a bit of luck the Nukes will fly sooner than later. One can only hope. Smiles ... all good ... we also need not be like that. Just kidding.
Here is a little personal share with my advice:
Just Be What You Want To Be:
- Life is too short -
I know it can't rival a dears head exploding, but though it might be preferable.
Yes I agree that is what takes place which I why I chose to say something that does more to relate Vs push my own agenda. Not sure if you follow Russell Brand but whatever people think of him as whatever, I found the following video an excellent perspective on what free speech should really be:
Yeah I don't disagree, been watching them for a while now.Russell Brand is red pilled as fuck. His daily videos on youtube are usually good listens.
Yeah I don't disagree, been watching them for a while now.
But then I came across vids of him and his buddy Yuval Harari.
That creepy little minion of Klaus Schwabs, the "...humans are now hackable animals" dude.
Just my opinion mate, I'm thinking Brand is just another controlled opposition shill.