Derek Chauvin Trial/George Floyd/Minneapolis

Nah. It’s a tiny percentage. It’s just that the media blows any situation up nowadays that could possibly portray police in a negative light. Think of all the high profile cases in the past couple years. And all the massive outrage and riots etc. Now think again of how many of those actually ended up in convictions. Most were clear bullshit from the start if you had any idea what you were looking at.
What the media says doesn't have any correlation on people's personal experiences.

Nothing you said above is incorrect but most people I know have had a negative experiences with the local PD.
 
What the media says doesn't have any correlation on people's personal experiences.

Nothing you said above is incorrect but most people I know have had a negative experiences with the local PD.
Generally speaking, the national media covers two main things:

1. Events of a large scale/affect a significant population (natural disasters, economic related events, politics, etc.)

2. Events that occur so infrequently that it is worthy of attention (serial killers/mass shootings, space/NASA events, etc.)


note: i may have quoted the wrong comment, but i'm about to head to ikea, so I'm clearly not thinking straight.
 
Generally speaking, the national media covers two main things:

1. Events of a large scale/affect a significant population (natural disasters, economic related events, politics, etc.)

2. Events that occur so infrequently that it is worthy of attention (serial killers/mass shootings, space/NASA events, etc.)


note: i may have quoted the wrong comment, but i'm about to head to ikea, so I'm clearly not thinking straight.
Agreed.

It's why they try to gaslight the law enforcement topic as a black problem because in reality it's an everyone problem.
 
Have you seen that pd's directives on excited delirium? He ain't getting any kind of murder. Involuntary Manslaughter is probably the only thing they can realistically get.
And thats not what he is accused of. No one in the thread seems to understand that Progressive prosecutors continually and intentionally over charge in cases like this, in order to help fuel the racial divide. Soros is rubbing his hands together.
 
So where was everyone during the OJ verdict? I was in 3rd grade when my teacher rolled one of these bad boys out.

The reason why I ask, what would have been the reactions/live feeds/everything during and at the end of that trial?

1615247209872.png
 
Fingers crossed on the chemist. Plenty of women, especially minority women, in that line of work...but you'd hope someone who thinks critically and certainly someone sho understands toxicology 1000x more than your average juror.
Agreed.

I wouldn't want to share time with Chauvin over drinks but the dude doesn't deserve to be railroaded to appease the mob. It's hard for me to see how anything he did was illegal or justifies jail time.
 
Agreed.

I wouldn't want to share time with Chauvin over drinks but the dude doesn't deserve to be railroaded to appease the mob. It's hard for me to see how anything he did was illegal or justifies jail time.

Feel the same, and do about Kyle Rittenhouse and many others being railroaded by our corrupt justice system.

It's a scary time when the mob is seemingly in charge, or at least aligned with our crooked government and corrupt justice department against political opposition.
 
Anyone doing anything other than a 'peaceful' protest should be charged with a crime, any crime to do with trying to influence judges or jurors with provacative behavior. Of course cameltoe harris will springe for their bail. I'd say let 'em fry along with whatever we'll see with Chauvin. We're spending millions here in Minny to keep the 'em effers' out of the courthouse and that pisses me off.
 
Well, apparently the first juror selected was the chemist, who is white. He thinks blm is too extreme, and somehow has NOT seen the Floyd video. The second juror is a black woman who has a relative who is a cop.

Sounds like 2 jurors who might be reasonable and do the right thing, and acquit on all charges.

I still think this is all a setup to cause as much division & unrest as possible. Way overcharge the cop, make sure he is found not guilty, then sit back and watch all the little pawns burn shit down.
 
Well, apparently the first juror selected was the chemist, who is white. He thinks blm is too extreme, and somehow has NOT seen the Floyd video. The second juror is a black woman who has a relative who is a cop.

Sounds like 2 jurors who might be reasonable and do the right thing, and acquit on all charges.

I still think this is all a setup to cause as much division & unrest as possible. Way overcharge the cop, make sure he is found not guilty, then sit back and watch all the little pawns burn shit down.
Most people I know haven't seen the video nor do they give a shit.

Druggie got what he had coming to him and the rest is the mob and swamp doing what they do.
 
Most people I know haven't seen the video nor do they give a shit.

Druggie got what he had coming to him and the rest is the mob and swamp doing what they do.

Hopefully most of the jury is like the people you know, and haven't paid a lick of attention to the corporate media propaganda on the issue. If anyone simply looks at the facts, there is no chance he is guilty of anything.
 
Hopefully most of the jury is like the people you know, and haven't paid a lick of attention to the corporate media propaganda on the issue. If anyone simply looks at the facts, there is no chance he is guilty of anything.
That's why they want to keep the trial there IMO. Much more likely to get a tainted jury that favors the druggie just due to human nature and proximity.

Move that shit anywhere else and they'd have no chance for a conviction on anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom