Mork from Mork & Mindy was also brought in on en egg
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
BUSH SAYS EXPLOSIVE WERE PUT HIGH ENOUGH IN TWIN TOWERS SO PEOPLE COULDNT ESCAPE
Cinco Bayou
LOL, Fuck this little Scam artist POS.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew
With respect Jonathan -- unless you spent time in the trials with the evidence, and observed the testimony and cross, and evaluated the jurors, their backgrounds and answers to written questionnaires when used, you are simply assuming that J6 defendants 5th and 6th Amendment rights were afforded to them.Those rights have nothing to do with guilt or innocence based on the evidence.As a practitioner with 90 federal criminal cases under my belt, and being quite good in courtrooms, if my J6 cases had been in NDWV, I would have had 50% either acquittals or hung juries. There was no "due process" to be had in DC courtrooms in front of DC juries. Two fundamental legal issues had 95% support from the DC District Judges -- with both being overturned at the appellate level. Dozens of other critical decisions would have come under scrutiny in the months ahead. I argued a critical issue in Dec. that I think I would win -- not mooted out by the pardons.You know better than anyone that media coverage of legal proceedings, especially what takes place inside the courtroom, is not an accurate arbiter of the fairness of those proceedings.
With respect Jonathan -- unless you spent time in the trials with the evidence, and observed the testimony and cross, and evaluated the jurors, their backgrounds and answers to written questionnaires when used, you are simply assuming that J6 defendants 5th and 6th Amendment rights were afforded to them.Those rights have nothing to do with guilt or innocence based on the evidence.As a practitioner with 90 federal criminal cases under my belt, and being quite good in courtrooms, if my J6 cases had been in NDWV, I would have had 50% either acquittals or hung juries. There was no "due process" to be had in DC courtrooms in front of DC juries. Two fundamental legal issues had 95% support from the DC District Judges -- with both being overturned at the appellate level. Dozens of other critical decisions would have come under scrutiny in the months ahead. I argued a critical issue in Dec. that I think I would win -- not mooted out by the pardons.You know better than anyone that media coverage of legal proceedings, especially what takes place inside the courtroom, is not an accurate arbiter of the fairness of those proceedings.
When you see someone claiming these proceedings were fair and impartial, present this tirade to them.Long past time to impeach this desperate, bitter hag."The only reason provided for this instruction, as set out in the [President's] Proclamation’s introduction, is the assertion that this action 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation. No 'national injustice' occurred here, just as no outcome-determinative election fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential election. No “process of national reconciliation” can begin when poor losers, whose preferred candidate loses an election, are glorified for disrupting a constitutionally mandated proceeding in Congress and doing so with impunity. That merely raises the dangerous specter of future lawless conduct by other poor losers and undermines the rule of law. Yet, this presidential pronouncement of a 'national injustice' is the sole justification provided in the government’s motion to dismiss the pending indictment. Having presided over scores of criminal cases charging defendants for their criminal conduct both outside and inside the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, which charges were fully supported by evidence in the form of extensive videotapes and photographs, admissions by defendants in the course of plea hearings and in testimony at trials, and the testimony of law enforcement officers and congressional staff present at the Capitol on that day, this Court cannot let stand the revisionist myth relayed in this presidential pronouncement. The prosecutions in this case and others charging defendants for their criminal conduct at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, present no injustice, but instead reflect the diligent work of conscientious public servants, including prosecutors and law enforcement officials, and dedicated defense attorneys, to defend our democracy and rights and preserve our long tradition of peaceful transfers of power—which, until January 6, 2021, served as a model to the world—all while affording those charged every protection guaranteed by our Constitution and the criminal justice system. As to these two defendants specifically, both admitted their criminal conduct under oath, after consultation with their attorneys, and pursuant to plea agreements to which they agreed. Bluntly put, the assertion offered in the presidential pronouncement for the pending motion to dismiss is flatly wrong."She dismissed without prejudice instead of with prejudice as DOJ asked
He is going to get awfully lonely
Isn't it time for this POS to be doing time for tax evasion?
9Mounties07
Legendary
Nice. Near ajs on the bayou
dirtytoeddawg
Legendary
Where’s Ezra Cohen?
F*ck em all.
Awesome!
We’re so fucking back! He is about to Make the Military Great Again!
Also, I thought I was a tweet that said Hegseth was nominated 53-47 with Fetterman being the only dem to vote yes.
Whatever is in your arm, yo, is also all over your body. Organs included, yo!
So the FBI ASAC that said the act is New Orleans wasn’t a terror attack was reassigned. Guess where, the city the Tennessee shooting occurred in today.
Similar threads
