• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Th
146208680_1012167722644695_797770720255754481_o.jpg


If I had to guess this is @BamaRidger as a young boy.
That looks a lot like me except I had a “General Lee” big wheel. That motherfucker was badass. I did so many skid stops on that thing I wore holes in both back wheels.E64D4BB9-C819-4887-9BBF-04C7C045505A.jpeg
 
All it would take is an EO banning banks and platforms from handling or dealing in it.

Furthermore an EO could easily ban retail investors from trading in it.

People already buy and sell crypto across the net so using the net to attack cryptos would be pretty straight forward. They can go after the wallets too as another means.

You don't have to eliminate the crypto from existing to end it's usefulness and demand.

All that would need done is allowing gov crypto to be the only tradable crypto. Central banks and gov are prepared to do this if crypto demand exceeds certain thresholds vs fiat over the next 2 years as gov cryptos come online.

The 'decentealized' line means nothing. Govs can ban the dealing or handling of pretty much anything especially in the US.

taking down the power grid would also put a damper on it. And if that happens for more than a few days bullets will be the most valuable currency.
 
All it would take is an EO banning banks and platforms from handling or dealing in it.

Furthermore an EO could easily ban retail investors from trading in it.

People already buy and sell crypto across the net so using the net to attack cryptos would be pretty straight forward. They can go after the wallets too as another means.

You don't have to eliminate the crypto from existing to end it's usefulness and demand.

All that would need done is allowing gov crypto to be the only tradable crypto. Central banks and gov are prepared to do this if crypto demand exceeds certain thresholds vs fiat over the next 2 years as gov cryptos come online.

The 'decentealized' line means nothing. Govs can ban the dealing or handling of pretty much anything especially in the US.
You’re dead on except for that there’s no mechanism that exists to easily go after all the wallets out there, you’re just assuming one exists
 
Actually I have a BA in Government & Economics from Texas. (Was thinking law school but didn't go.)

I've been battle-tested against libs since college due to my curriculum choice.

Just call me a Liberal Arts "Outlier" that understands numbers and finance ;)

Hopefully we can still be friends :cool:
Economics is basically the same thing and b good but when you said Government major at UT I almost threw up on the floor. I assumed Mortgage being part of your name and you’re not afraid of them unplugging bitcoin you’re on top of the numbers though so yeah we can be friends
 

Matt with the burn on Liz Cheney


 

Dick has a D next to his name and runs for senate in Connecticut. As we all know, most voters vote based on party alone. (basically saying the majority of voters have no clue what a candidate is or isn't after their party affiliation) That is how he keeps getting re-elected. Which is odd because he was a terrible AG for the state before running for senator. His popularity has been waning some over the last couple years, but I am not sure it enough for him to be voted out of office any time soon.
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00
Back
Top Bottom