• In Memory of Rebarcock.

    As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
4chan has been all over this since it was announced a couple of weeks ago. Couple of things to not before people get their hopes up....

1. This is where they will decide whether or not to even hear a case.
2. There is no guarantee the case will even be discussed.
3. Very likely it gets dismissed as moot much like the emoluments clause case.

However, the fact there are 3 cases before the court they could I believe combine them into an outcome determinative case. No idea how it would work. It only takes 4 justices to decide to hear a case so it is possible but I would say not likely they are heard.

I was wondering what the process was as I didn't understand the language "for conference". Question for you however, will Sidney be able to present any evidence at this point? Or will evidence even be considered?
It seems to me that this is the big thing. Everything up till now seems to be procedural rejections. No evidence is being considered. If the evidence is presented, I don't see how the court wouldn't make the states fix the issues and retabulate the the votes.
 
Your point #1 has no basis in reality. This is not limited to ERCOT and has everything to do with fuel supply in these extreme conditions — not electricity delivery points. Your point #2 is spot on.
Update: This is elevated and has spread up through the Southwest Power Pool footprint. No rolling outages in SPP like in ERCOT yet, but customer usage reductions have been issued.
 
I was wondering what the process was as I didn't understand the language "for conference". Question for you however, will Sidney be able to present any evidence at this point? Or will evidence even be considered?
It seems to me that this is the big thing. Everything up till now seems to be procedural rejections. No evidence is being considered. If the evidence is presented, I don't see how the court wouldn't make the states fix the issues and retabulate the the votes.

They have all filed briefs. So think of like everything with the Texas case and how all of that was filed and what not. It is similar. That was original jurisdiction so it went through a different process and bypassed the conference stage that this one is in.

This is essentially right now where the Texas case was dropped except unlike that case it does not get its own special discussion because it wis not original jurisdiction (Only SC hears OJ cases). Thus, these cases will all be possibly discussed at the conference.

Also, forgot to add there is no guarantee that the cases will even be discussed at this conference. In fact most cases that are part of the conference are just dismissed without even being discussed.
 
giphy.gif
All fags raise your right finger.
 
Update: This is elevated and has spread up through the Southwest Power Pool footprint. No rolling outages in SPP like in ERCOT yet, but customer usage reductions have been issued.
Further update: SPP has moved to a Level 2 alert. Next step could be similar to Texas, but with a larger footprint and more diverse resources, probably not as severe. Sometimes wanting to be independent, like Texas did with ERCOT, can leave you alone with with your bare ass hanging out in sub zero temps. Jus’ sayin’.
 


Awhile ago I used a hypothetical of “What if Twitter decides revealing the truth about something is too dangerous and shuts down that person’s account” as an example of the dangerous path suppressing free speech is on, and the slippery slope of labeling indirect speech as “incitement.”

I miss the days when I thought it was an extreme example that could never happen.
 
What is even the point of the SCOTUS looking at these cases? What could they possibly do about it now?
Rule the certifications were unconstitutional and void.

Edit to add:

Or, rule the stay requests should have been granted and the forensic investigations conducted before certification and, thus, the certifications are voided.

Or, rule the signature verifications were not conducted according to law and ballots are voided.

Or, rule the mail-in ballots were unconstitutional and voided.

Or, rule ballots counted before Election Day are voided.

Or, rule the ballots received after the deadline on election night are voided.

Or, . . .
 
Last edited:
Here are the Real Time and Day-Ahead market pricing contour maps for SPP. They are normally in the deeper shades of blue . . .


View attachment 7204

View attachment 7205
A friend of mine told me Koch industries was shutting down a big ammonia plant near me because their natural gas rate went from $2 to over $200.
 
Last edited:
A friend of mine told me Koch industries was shutting down a big ammonia plant near me because their natural gas rate went from $2 to over $200.
Yep. This is what we talked about a few days ago about the differences between electric and natural gas transmission. The tighter gas supply issues have widespread ramifications. The electric issue now is with fuel supplies to combustion turbine and combined-cycle power generation units. The transmission grid (lines) are doing fine so far in this. But lack of natural gas and frozen coal piles are an issue.
 
Yep. This is what we talked about a few days ago about the differences between electric and natural gas transmission. The tighter gas supply issues have widespread ramifications. The electric issue now is with fuel supplies to combustion turbine and combined-cycle power generation units. The transmission grid (lines) are doing fine so far in this. But lack of natural gas and frozen coal piles are an issue.

Is this all happen just because of the weather or combined with something stupid Uncle Joe has done?
 
Rule the certifications were unconstitutional and void.

Edit to add:

Or, rule the stay requests should have been granted and the forensic investigations conducted before certification and, thus, the certifications are voided.

Or, rule the signature verifications were not conducted according to law and ballots are voided.

Or, rule the mail-in ballots were unconstitutional and voided.

Or, rule ballots counted before Election Day are voided.

Or, rule the ballots received after the deadline on election night are voided.

Or, . . .
Yes, this. Get it all out to the public. Will it be heard by the courts Jayhox? Hoping so, just more red pill magic.
 
I think you only need 4 to get a case out of conference and set for hearing, so Robert’s can’t single-handedly fvck this up. Whether the others will pull through is the question. I don’t know.
Conversely, wouldn't take much to shut it down..we know they have 3=4 already...my concern is no matter how well intended the newest justices are, they're vulnerable to mafioso-style threats against them and their families. As absurd as that once sounded, given all we've learned here in the last few years, nothing is out of play. The DS has zero limits on what it'll do to keep the system in tact.
 
Rule the certifications were unconstitutional and void.

Edit to add:

Or, rule the stay requests should have been granted and the forensic investigations conducted before certification and, thus, the certifications are voided.

Or, rule the signature verifications were not conducted according to law and ballots are voided.

Or, rule the mail-in ballots were unconstitutional and voided.

Or, rule ballots counted before Election Day are voided.

Or, rule the ballots received after the deadline on election night are voided.

Or, . . .

It's hard to believe they would have passed on the Texas lawsuit only to then allow these to move forward
 
Conversely, wouldn't take much to shut it down..we know they have 3=4 already...my concern is no matter how well intended the newest justices are, they're vulnerable to mafioso-style threats against them and their families. As absurd as that once sounded, given all we've learned here in the last few years, nothing is out of play. The DS has zero limits on what it'll do to keep the system in tact.
The collateral damage from hearing these cases would completely invalidate the entire Biden administration. Therefore, one should only conclude that this will get swept under the rug. My guess is they won’t even move forward. Ask yourself this...Why would the same group of people who fraudulently stole an election allow a governing body, which they control members of, to undo said election? The answer is they won’t. Anyone hoping this will get somewhere needs to remind themselves that in today’s world, what’s right is wrong and what’s wrong is right. This is a nothing-burger.
 
The collateral damage from hearing these cases would completely invalidate the entire Biden administration. Therefore, one should only conclude that this will get swept under the rug. My guess is they won’t even move forward. Ask yourself this...Why would the same group of people who fraudulently stole an election allow a governing body, which they control members of, to undo said election? The answer is they won’t. Anyone hoping this will get somewhere needs to remind themselves that in today’s world, what’s right is wrong and what’s wrong is right. This is a nothing-burger.
The MSM and the libs continue to say it was an insurrection. SCOTUS might as well make it a reality. I'm all in.
 
This "there was no strategy" bungling narrative is laughable and yet still annoying as fvck. Just listen to KAHmula (even if you can only take a few seconds)...you can tell she knows it's a lie because she says "right?" after each of her idiotic assertions - we're barely 3 weeks in and the ineptitude is somehow even worse than I thought it'd be.

If this is 'showing the people", I hope we're getting pretty fvcking close to the precipice!
 
Fuck it. Lets start the next civil war before we lose our country!
The only way we’re going to get out of this mess is to put down the fantasy (“The Plan”) and start organizing movements at the local levels. We need to primary a majority of Congress at midterms. Flip the house in 22.’ We also need to focus on schools and try to flush out anti-american teachers. Our youth is completely brainwashed and that should frighten everyone. I don’t know about y’all but I don’t want today’s youth making my health care decisions in 20 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom