4chan has been all over this since it was announced a couple of weeks ago. Couple of things to not before people get their hopes up....
1. This is where they will decide whether or not to even hear a case.
2. There is no guarantee the case will even be discussed.
3. Very likely it gets dismissed as moot much like the emoluments clause case.
However, the fact there are 3 cases before the court they could I believe combine them into an outcome determinative case. No idea how it would work. It only takes 4 justices to decide to hear a case so it is possible but I would say not likely they are heard.
I was wondering what the process was as I didn't understand the language "for conference". Question for you however, will Sidney be able to present any evidence at this point? Or will evidence even be considered?
It seems to me that this is the big thing. Everything up till now seems to be procedural rejections. No evidence is being considered. If the evidence is presented, I don't see how the court wouldn't make the states fix the issues and retabulate the the votes.


