Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
Shoot to kill
Back to government cheese
Before long shots are going to be fired.
Re: CO2. Matter cannot be created or destroyed. Law of Conversion of Mass. What's here is what's here. It just gets rearranged.
Last edited:
Rerun of a good oldie
OPD77
Legendary
Is Earnst FINALLY getting red pilled 9r just being a POS opportunist? I don't trust her.
These MFers are crazy and getting crazier. DJT broke them all...
OPD77
Legendary
Did Harry return the favor by sending a pic of his vagina?
Last edited:
Judge Boasberg did not, and does not, have the power to do what he is purporting to do. For this reason alone, everything he is doing is lawless. But it is much worse; it is also dangerous.Judge Boasberg ran to his courtroom to hold a Saturday hearing, even though he was not even serving as the emergency judge that weekend. (How did he get this case?) He publicly exposed an ongoing U.S. military, intelligence, and law-enforcement operation with an American ally dealing with the most vicious terrorists (Tren de Aragua) and international gang member (MS13) in the Western Hemisphere.That public exposure put American and allied lives in grave danger.Stunningly, Judge Boasberg even ordered the President to turn around planes full of terrorists over the Gulf of America, without knowing the fuel levels, the security footprint back in America, or other crucial operational details.We saw the enormous security footprint in El Salvador. Why would we have had that same footprint in America, as who could have ever imagined an activist DC judge could or would order the President to return planes full of terrorists?And not completing the mission would have humiliated and politically damaged El Salvador's president, who had hundreds of military, law-enforcement, and other officials awaiting--and who took a significant political and personal risk by agreeing to take these terrorists.Judge Boasberg's Saturday hearing and order crossed the red line. But Judge Boasberg is doubling down by demanding details about the military operation, to which he is not entitled. Judge Boasberg says he has a security clearance, but he definitely does not have the need to know. And allowing judges to meddle in military operations like this is dangerous and unacceptable.Foreign leaders are less likely to work with the President, if they fear an activist American judge may disclose their secrets. This harms the President’s ability to conduct foreign policy and his constitutional duty to keep us safe.The President has a constitutional duty, as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief, to conduct international affairs, repeal foreign invasion, and protect American lives. The President has a constitutional duty to ignore any clearly unlawful court order that imminently endangers American lives, like Judge Boasberg's orders.Judge Boasberg is refusing to back down. So the House must move forward with impeachment proceedings for his lawless and dangerous sabotage of the President's core Article II powers.
BREAKING: Judge Boasberg rejects Trump administration call to rescind his restraining order, saying the Venezuelans marked for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act are likely to win — because they are entitled to individual hearings/due process. https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025cv0766-53…
Talk is cheap although informative. It's action to prevent these from occurring again.
@Viking's post went away about HUD. HUD, Agriculture, HHS could be brought under the umbrella of Dept of Interior and run by Undersecretarys as a division of Interior. VA could be brought under the DOD and run by an Undersecretary. Transportation, Labor and perhaps Energy could be put under Commerce and run by Undersectaries. Treasury, Justice, State, and Homeland Security would remain. DOEd gone bye-bye.
Now down from 15 agencies to 7. Lots of real estate to be sold and could run each cabinet and their divisions with about 1/2 the personnel. Several like Agriculture, Interior, Labor, Energy, HUD, and HHS could be relocated in the states closer to where they are needed. Ag to Neb or Kn, Energy to Texas, Labor and HUD would do better in some state. No need for these to be all in DC. Many of the sub-agencies could also relocate and be merged. There are many buildings, some vacant or almost vacant throughout the country which are pre-existing and could house these agencies without the need for new construction.
Now down from 15 agencies to 7. Lots of real estate to be sold and could run each cabinet and their divisions with about 1/2 the personnel. Several like Agriculture, Interior, Labor, Energy, HUD, and HHS could be relocated in the states closer to where they are needed. Ag to Neb or Kn, Energy to Texas, Labor and HUD would do better in some state. No need for these to be all in DC. Many of the sub-agencies could also relocate and be merged. There are many buildings, some vacant or almost vacant throughout the country which are pre-existing and could house these agencies without the need for new construction.
ShaolinNole
Legendary
You can also rent both.
I meant to edit and ended up deleting it. Couldn't get my thoughts coherent enough. Basically taking the state of our "urban" areas we need to send HUD to the bin where DOE is going. The urban inhabitants need to be developed. Maybe we get them to invest in their own fucking communities. Oh, and put the management of housing and development in the hands of the states. These beaurocracies need to be ended! Skol!
Energy to Texas. There’s a novel idea. We are the energy capital of the world.
Alright, what is the verdict on the signal leak… controlled op, or fuck up?
I’m old enough to remember Trump’s Opportunity Zones.
Goldhedge
Legendary
Jury is still out... FAF if it's an op...
First thought is it indeed might be a major fuck up.
However, Pete gave a master class in damage control when he touched down in Hawaii.
Basically, ZFG and GFY the Atlantic
OPD77
Legendary
Absolutely
The name “LaTarsha” is a modern, creative variation of names that blend the prefix “La-” with “Tarsha,” itself often derived from “Tasha,” a diminutive of “Natasha.” Its origins are primarily African American, emerging in the United States during the mid-20th century as part of a broader trend of inventive naming practices. “Natasha” has roots in Russian, short for “Natalia,” which comes from the Latin natale domini, meaning “birth of the Lord” or “Christmas Day.” The “La-” prefix, however, is a distinctly American innovation, frequently used in African American communities to create unique, phonetically rich names.
The rise of names like LaTarsha reflects a cultural movement that gained momentum in the 1960s and 1970s, a period marked by increased emphasis on Black identity and pride, particularly during the Civil Rights and Black Power movements. During this time, many African Americans began crafting names that stood apart from traditional Anglo-European naming conventions, often incorporating prefixes like “La-,” “De-,” or “Sha-” to existing names or sounds. This practice allowed for individuality and cultural expression, distancing from names tied to historical oppression or assimilation.
Demographically, names like LaTarsha are most commonly found among African American women born between the 1960s and 1990s. Social Security Administration data shows LaTarsha peaked in popularity in 1976, with 171 babies given the name in the U.S. that year, ranking it #815 among girls’ names. Its usage has since declined, but it remains a marker of a specific era and cultural context. The preference for such names in this demographic can be linked to several factors:
While the exact “why” behind individual name choices varies—ranging from familial homage to pure aesthetic appeal—the broader pattern reflects a deliberate move toward cultural autonomy. Names like LaTarsha are less about their etymological roots and more about what they represent: resilience, creativity, and a reclaiming of narrative power in naming. Today, though less common, they remain a testament to this historical moment.
The rise of names like LaTarsha reflects a cultural movement that gained momentum in the 1960s and 1970s, a period marked by increased emphasis on Black identity and pride, particularly during the Civil Rights and Black Power movements. During this time, many African Americans began crafting names that stood apart from traditional Anglo-European naming conventions, often incorporating prefixes like “La-,” “De-,” or “Sha-” to existing names or sounds. This practice allowed for individuality and cultural expression, distancing from names tied to historical oppression or assimilation.
Demographically, names like LaTarsha are most commonly found among African American women born between the 1960s and 1990s. Social Security Administration data shows LaTarsha peaked in popularity in 1976, with 171 babies given the name in the U.S. that year, ranking it #815 among girls’ names. Its usage has since declined, but it remains a marker of a specific era and cultural context. The preference for such names in this demographic can be linked to several factors:
- Cultural Identity: These names serve as a form of self-assertion, celebrating creativity and heritage while rejecting Eurocentric norms. They often carry a lyrical quality, emphasizing rhythm and sound, which aligns with African oral traditions.
- Community Influence: Naming trends spread within tight-knit communities, where unique names can signify belonging or innovation. LaTarsha and similar names (e.g., LaToya, LaKeisha) became fashionable as families sought distinctive identities for their children.
- Socioeconomic Context: During the mid-20th century, African American families, particularly in urban areas, embraced these names as a way to stand out in a society that often marginalized them. The prefix “La-” added a modern twist, signaling a break from the past.
While the exact “why” behind individual name choices varies—ranging from familial homage to pure aesthetic appeal—the broader pattern reflects a deliberate move toward cultural autonomy. Names like LaTarsha are less about their etymological roots and more about what they represent: resilience, creativity, and a reclaiming of narrative power in naming. Today, though less common, they remain a testament to this historical moment.
Goldhedge
Legendary
Because they hate white man's English.
Gotta put razor blades in those yard signs people!
Electrify them.
Similar threads
