Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
weaponoffreedom
Elite
as @Hoosier in Mad Town said, to reduce noise, 100% agreed
The other thing would be to increase reliability.
Suppressors, even today, can make a gun very ammo picky, and lead to overgassing, which will sometimes cause failures to cycle.
A single shot bolt gun would fix all ammo incompatibility issues.
They've moved on to bigger and more pathogenic viruses after killing millions and maiming billions. Trial run worked so well they can enhance the viruses to do more damage.
Perhaps it's time for the Senators to bypass the MSM and go directly to podsters, X and the new media. Refusing the MSM requests and then sitting with a podster or other alternative sources might just get the MSM's attention. Reporters don't need jobs if they can't get stories although we know investigating events comes secondary to making shit up and printing it as fact.
Many years ago, I filled out a questionnaire. It the section for identifying my race, ethnicity or whatever it's called, I saw AA, Native American, Caucasian, Hispanic, and the other traditional races. Then at the end was Hasidic Jew. What? When did they become a race? Only saw this once -- never since.
Looks like a younger Aubrey Plaza......
Which is nice.
I don’t know what it is about that woman but man she is sexy as hell to me.
Goldhedge
Legendary
30 years ago today: Kissinger on Russia & NATO expansion Dec. 5, 1994 PBS Newshour, w/ Jack Matlock
Henry Kissinger and former Ambassador Jack Matlock debate the future of NATO and Russia during the Budapest Summit on Dec. 5, 1994. Robert MacNeil moderates the discussion.
Summary generated by ChatGPT:
The 1994 discussion between Henry Kissinger and Jack Matlock revolved around the contentious issue of NATO expansion and its implications for U.S.-Russia relations and Eastern Europe's stability. The debate was set against the backdrop of Russian opposition, articulated by President Boris Yeltsin, who warned that expanding NATO could lead to a "cold peace" and further isolate Russia.
Kissinger supported NATO expansion as a necessary step to ensure the security and sovereignty of Central European countries like Poland and Hungary. He argued that delaying expansion could create a geopolitical vacuum, leaving these nations vulnerable to influence from both Germany and Russia. Kissinger viewed NATO as a stabilizing force and an "insurance policy" against future uncertainties, emphasizing that such moves need not antagonize Russia if managed through diplomatic and military assurances.
Matlock, however, cautioned against hasty expansion, noting that Russia's current weakness did not pose an immediate military threat. He believed that NATO expansion might inflame nationalist sentiments within Russia, complicating its internal politics and its path toward democracy. Instead, he argued for prioritizing economic integration of Eastern European nations into the European Union and maintaining diplomacy to address Russian concerns. The conversation highlighted differing perspectives on balancing security, diplomacy, and the risks of escalating tensions in post-Cold War Europe.
Produced by Tim Groeling
From the archives of the UCLA Irv and Xiaoyan Drasnin Communication Archive. Digitized 2024. https://comm.ucla.edu/drasnin-communi...
Henry Kissinger and former Ambassador Jack Matlock debate the future of NATO and Russia during the Budapest Summit on Dec. 5, 1994. Robert MacNeil moderates the discussion.
Summary generated by ChatGPT:
The 1994 discussion between Henry Kissinger and Jack Matlock revolved around the contentious issue of NATO expansion and its implications for U.S.-Russia relations and Eastern Europe's stability. The debate was set against the backdrop of Russian opposition, articulated by President Boris Yeltsin, who warned that expanding NATO could lead to a "cold peace" and further isolate Russia.
Kissinger supported NATO expansion as a necessary step to ensure the security and sovereignty of Central European countries like Poland and Hungary. He argued that delaying expansion could create a geopolitical vacuum, leaving these nations vulnerable to influence from both Germany and Russia. Kissinger viewed NATO as a stabilizing force and an "insurance policy" against future uncertainties, emphasizing that such moves need not antagonize Russia if managed through diplomatic and military assurances.
Matlock, however, cautioned against hasty expansion, noting that Russia's current weakness did not pose an immediate military threat. He believed that NATO expansion might inflame nationalist sentiments within Russia, complicating its internal politics and its path toward democracy. Instead, he argued for prioritizing economic integration of Eastern European nations into the European Union and maintaining diplomacy to address Russian concerns. The conversation highlighted differing perspectives on balancing security, diplomacy, and the risks of escalating tensions in post-Cold War Europe.
Produced by Tim Groeling
From the archives of the UCLA Irv and Xiaoyan Drasnin Communication Archive. Digitized 2024. https://comm.ucla.edu/drasnin-communi...
Goldhedge
Legendary
You're behind the 8 ball...
should have paid attention when the 'Q' was posting and followed along like the rest of us.
Have to find him first....
2nd point: Did the coroner determine that he killed the guy? Thought I remember something about he was still breathing after the altercation.
Last edited:
If true, that's .08% of his net worth.
AgEngDawg
Legendary
He really, really pissed off the nuts.
All those regulations that never get rescinded can be used against your political opponents. We all saw that recently.
We see individuals and units today as brave as those men were. But, never collectively en masse. Greatest generation without a doubt.
AgEngDawg
Legendary
We already in WWIII
gettr.com
Steve Bannon on GETTR : The Third World War https://www.thefp.com/p/world-war-iii-syria-israel-south-korea-ukrains
The ‘Axis of Upheaval’ is on the march—and the U.S. must figure out how to respond.
AgEngDawg
Legendary
In honor of WWIII:We already in WWIII
Steve Bannon on GETTR : The Third World War https://www.thefp.com/p/world-war-iii-syria-israel-south-korea-ukrains
The ‘Axis of Upheaval’ is on the march—and the U.S. must figure out how to respond.
Similar threads
