Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

postngone

Poster
Joined
Nov 12, 2024
Messages
162
In the south free masons are a cover name for KKK. Of course I don’t have proof other than my brother in law whos a free mason gets all defensive when I mention this. Additionally there are secret societies inside free mason.. and how would someone be able to disprove this if these extra layers are secret?

I’ll leave you with this.. lol.

you are forgetting the Freemasons isnt a single organisation.. You should see them as chapters, or orders.

These orders hold hands over each other's heads, but also struggle for power.

For example, Bill Gates is part of the Rosicrucian's. They want freedom of information flows.

Dutch king is member of a shit ton of orders, for example order of Nassau, order of Malta, and many many more. The order of Nassau would be to 'control' the Dutch related stuff.

So there is overlap. And each order is having their own.. Ehm.. Vision? What ever you mc Call it.

So having a masonic order with KKK tendencies, sure, why not? Symbolism is there.

On the other hand, Rothschild's are in the order of Nassau.

And I believe like every fucking state of America has orders... I'm betting there's an order for many different big cities. Continental orders.

Having a masonic order where only women empowerment is the goal? Sure why not. Celestial sisters.

And don't forget... In theory, every idiot can start an order.. (WEF for example). As long as you can drum up enough people, inspire them, and conspire together.. In theory, you are an order... And if other orders accept you, you become legit... Most of the time, this goes along with a sacrifice or a significant power grasp.

Not every order has the same level of power... It's boss over boss. Dog-eat-dog.

The only difference here is they all have... Or let's say hold certain information that could be impactful. Simple example, when Captain Jack Sparrow got caught, he requested a Parlez (or Parlez vous) thus creating a momentum for a win, they can do the same. A complex example would be, the handshake or certain symbolism would tell if it's a trustworthy person or not.

And another example is the Oak Island series, where normally the door would be shut, with an introduction from an American order the Italian order would open its otherwise closed door. So otherwise sealed information would become accessible. Thus giving an advantage.

There's weirdly enough more politics and diplomacy in the secret society over the real politics.


As above, so below, in other words. Within the orders, you will see the same power struggles and secrecy (toward lower ranked members, for example).
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
23,125
Ehm guys? Why am I getting notifications for tomorrow?

View attachment 226751
aliens-ancient-explaining.gif

Obviously
 

postngone

Poster
Joined
Nov 12, 2024
Messages
162
kB3I3vhJJOTcbKWOWdHU_24_629f3255a2e185fff07ab03dd141bbb2_image.jpg
1732896318692.png
1732896282220.pngFGBl7v9WYAAQbsM.jpg
1732896397986.png
1732897011902.png
1732897285223.png
1732897416461.png
Its kind of hard to visualize the dependencies of these order on each other… Since they dont even know it.

But this should give at least the basic idea of how masons is just an umbrella term for many smaller groups of people conspiring together.

TFSF lodge? xD We should start a handshake.
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Legendary
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
8,836
1732900738371.png

"Let them kill as many as possible."

Senator Harry Truman, Democrat, of Missouri, suggested that the United States help whichever side seemed to be losing.

“If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill as many as possible, although I don’t want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances. Neither of them think anything of their pledged word.”
This is how the then US Senator and future President Harry Truman commented on the news of the beginning of the war between the USSR and Germany on the pages of the New York Times on June 23, 1941.

Replace Germany with Ukraine and read this message again, focusing on the current situation.

“If we see that Ukraine is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Ukraine and that way let them kill as many as possible...”

Clearly, this time, Russia can't possibly lose so helping Russia is not on the agenda.

However, the consistency of the key aspects of American policy, particularly its objectives, is evident. Their main goal in the ongoing conflict appears to be to inflict maximum casualties on one another, which explains their support for Kiev at this time. Their sole objective remains unchanged.

The objectives of the United States have remained consistent for many years.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH (https://t.me/infodefENGLAND)

Web (https://infodefense.press/) | VK (https://vk.com/club227549856) | X (https://x.com/info_defense_en?s=21) | InfoDefAl (https://t.me/InfoDefAll)l (http://cat.general/)
 

postngone

Poster
Joined
Nov 12, 2024
Messages
162
View attachment 226770

"Let them kill as many as possible."

Senator Harry Truman, Democrat, of Missouri, suggested that the United States help whichever side seemed to be losing.

“If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill as many as possible, although I don’t want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances. Neither of them think anything of their pledged word.”
This is how the then US Senator and future President Harry Truman commented on the news of the beginning of the war between the USSR and Germany on the pages of the New York Times on June 23, 1941.

Replace Germany with Ukraine and read this message again, focusing on the current situation.

“If we see that Ukraine is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Ukraine and that way let them kill as many as possible...”

Clearly, this time, Russia can't possibly lose so helping Russia is not on the agenda.

However, the consistency of the key aspects of American policy, particularly its objectives, is evident. Their main goal in the ongoing conflict appears to be to inflict maximum casualties on one another, which explains their support for Kiev at this time. Their sole objective remains unchanged.

The objectives of the United States have remained consistent for many years.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH (https://t.me/infodefENGLAND)

Web (https://infodefense.press/) | VK (https://vk.com/club227549856) | X (https://x.com/info_defense_en?s=21) | InfoDefAl (https://t.me/InfoDefAll)l (http://cat.general/)

I KNEW IT! Yes! Oh shit.. I'm on one of the sides. :eek: 'Ukraine' is WEF's European Union

If Ukraine falls, the E-Union will get real hard times. None of their sheep will trust them again. Looking forward to it.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom