I've been a little quiet for a bit because I'm beyond pissed and, frankly, have nothing new to add.
So, Let's go back to boys v girls and the ridiculous CNN argument that we don't know if men are better/faster /stronger.
One of these girls went D1 (She's 5'10"...and ablation August 18. Y'all who know, know) One of these girls missed junior olympics by .05. One of these girls is not an athlete, but she holds her own in a male dominated field (construction, to put it simple)
And then there's Max. Anybody want to have their daughter go up against him? Are you ready to watch your girl square up? (To be fair...Max would walk away. He would never risk hurting a girl).
There are 3 ridiculous athletes in this pic. 2 collegiate. 3 of whom were/are nationally ranked. 2 all state (Ohio). 1 who is a hs coach in her spare time(
) whose kids made it to state.
Easy question. Can you see the difference? It's that simple. (No, there's no girl who can go against my boy....nevermind he'll be the fist to tell you his sisters are better athletes.) throw a wig and some lipstick on Max. Have him tuck away the twig and berries. Any sport your girl plays, Still want your girl competing with him? Rules are rules. (Fun fact, the contract rules are much more ambiguous in women's sports than men's) Of course you don't. Because reality is a thing.
Maybe I'm suffering from internalized patriarchal motherhood
Max wears 17 for his sisters. That toxic masculinity!
17
ASU. Bonas/Dayton. Ol Miss. Roanoke