Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Tim Scott is going to run against Trump and DeSantis.

Would you vote for Tim Scott?

I donated to Ben Carson's campaign back in 2016. I thought he was intelligent and had moral fiber, and is well educated and has something other than a law degree from Harvard.

I hate career politicians. I wanted to see a non-politician in office.

For this reason, I would not support Tim Scott. Out of all the people running I'd rather see DeSantis become president. Even though he's also a poltician, I think he has some moral fiber based on how he's been doing in Florida.

Trump is meh. He's going to support big business because he's a big businessman. He's better than having a democrat in office but I'm not under any illusion that he would represent me or my interests.
 
one of those guys your buddy that you were talking about?
My buddy is a customer. Known for 6 years and is sharp as a tack. Was an officer in the navy for 20years. He’s been feeding me slivers of info like he’s trying to wake me up. Lol
Video goes over everything this thread is about. With proof and explanation.

Just something you have to listen to
If I can everybody else can. I’m by far the worst at taking the time to listen or watch so I encourage you to listen. Make your own opinions. I’m always skeptical but a lot of what I’m hearing lately and what we’re hearing is encouraging
 
My buddy is a customer. Known for 6 years and is sharp as a tack. Was an officer in the navy for 20years. He’s been feeding me slivers of info like he’s trying to wake me up. Lol
Video goes over everything this thread is about. With proof and explanation.

Just something you have to listen to
If I can everybody else can. I’m by far the worst at taking the time to listen or watch so I encourage you to listen. Make your own opinions. I’m always skeptical but a lot of what I’m hearing lately and what we’re hearing is encouraging
1684805756117.gif
 
The planes hit the buildings. That’s an irrefutable fact. And the buildings began to collapse from the exact impact points. Again irrefutable fact. Now did we allow it to happen, the official narrative, etc all good questions. But two aircraft full of civilians, all who have families, relatives, friends who are still alive today got on airplanes with the hijackers and those planes flew into the World Trade Center. No amount of what-aboutIsm can change the fact that those events occurred.
It’s quite possible that planes hit buildings and there were explosives already in place at those buildings. Perhaps a public investigation. But no. Our government never does that in an honest manner.
 
ec56y8dz8ns61.png


Not picking nits here, but 'irrefutable' might be a stretch. Most folks didn't know what CGI was back then.

One could argue the reason the buildings started to collapse at the 'exact' impact points is because transponders guided the planes to that point (where they put the explosive charges?) Plenty of firefighter online video testimonies stating 'Explosions were happening everywhere.'

What nobody is discussing is why the government came down hard on the PhD (Utah?) professor who crunched the numbers and said "Hey, these buildings came down at free fall rates! Which is impossible unless demolition charges were used!"

He got fired pronto from his university. The MSM came up with all kinds of 'reasons' why he was crazy for 'suggesting' that happened. They totally ignored his posits. Even Popular Mechanics bent the rules of physics and came up with a 'plausible' explanation as to why 2 planes brought down 3 buildings designed to never be brought down by planes.

And lest we forget Enron - one of the biggest financial scandals of the time? Building 7 housed ALL the files related to the pending court case regarding that escapade. Ken Lay was CEO and he mysteriously died just before being sentenced. (if you can trust wikipedia - the 'editable' source?)

And lest we also forget Rumsfeld announcing on national TV the day before that the Pentagon couldn't account for $2.3 Trillion that went 'missing'.

Of course, if one were to rewind to 1999 and read the PNAC white paper that said "...what we need is a Pearl Harbor-like event to get the American people to back a war..."

... and 'just like that' we GOT a Pearl Harbor-like event just a few years later... AFTER "W" was installed - remember the Florida chad episode and the SCOTUS weighing in? What do you think that was all about anyway?

Never mind that "W's" brother Jeb just happened to be the 'Governor' of Florida... i.e., they had 'their guy' in position.

and people associated with PNAC were involved with "W's" administration?

Never mind that Gen Wesley Clark made this comment: "7 countries in 7 years"


After 911, when planes hit 2 buildings, but 3 buildings fell at free-fall speed, we invaded Afghanistan - which had nothing to do with planes hitting buildings that fell at free-fall speeds - but DID offer the military a starting point to launch an invasion of IRAQ and assassinate Saddam Hussein who also had nothing to do with 911 and hated Bin Laden, who also had nothing to do with 911.

BUT Saddam did trade oil for Euros thus challenging the mighty Petro Dollar (render unto Caesar what is Caesar's?) which allowed the US to create mayhem and destruction and regime change because Saddam (a CIA asset) invaded Kuwait? and don't forget Muammar Gaddafi president of Libya who announced his plan to sell oil for gold Dinars throughout Africa thus also challenging the mighty Petro Dollar (render unto Caesar what is Caesar's?) Starting to 'see a pattern here?'

Then there was the (false) "Babies being thrown out of incubators!" and the "Yellow cake" excuse for invading a 3rd world nation and massacring a million civilians - because we have God on our side and we need to bring democracy to these heathen savages....

Remember Rumsfeld saying "The oil in Iraq will pay for the war."???

I love it when a plan comes together don't you?!

I could go on, but there's way more to consider than 'irrefutable evidence' that is easily 'refuted' by facts.
Oh yea..good shit
 

The Daily Signal talked to current and former Fox employees who requested anonymity to speak candidly about the company.

“They want you to think it’s this place that supports traditionally conservative values,” a former producer for “Tucker Carlson Tonight” told The Daily Signal. “But in reality, they’re pushing this nonsense behind the scenes.”

A source who still works at Fox News told The Daily Signal that after Carlson’s show was canceled in April, producers for the new 8 p.m. “Fox News Tonight” program were told not to bash Mulvaney. That directive came from high-level executives, the source said.

Fox News did not respond to The Daily Signal’s multiple requests for comment.

Under the category “Gender Transition,” Fox’s employee handbook promises that the company is dedicated to “expanding and strengthening” efforts to “sustain a more inclusive work environment.” The Fox employee handbook is posted on Workday, where employees can see company guidelines or policies, a former employee told The Daily Signal.
And so it should be decreed- no more linking Fox shit in this thread…
 
What a shocking revelation








Kristina Wong


Ex-Intelligence Officials Who Knew 2016 Russian Collusion Was a Hoax Cooked Up Scheme to Help Biden in 2020 https://breitbart.com/politics/2023/05/22/ex-intelligence-officials-knew-2016-russian-collusion-was-hoax-cooked-up-scheme-help-biden-2020/… via
@BreitbartNews



breitbart.com
Brennan, Clapper Knew Russian Collusion Was a Hoax But Cooked Up Spy Letter
Brennan and Clapper were aware Russian collusion was a hoax cooked up by Hillary Clinton but tried to cook up their own scheme to help Biden in 2020.




"Durham’s report said the next morning, on July 29, 2016, Brennan briefed then-FBI Director James Comey on the White House meeting, and that after he spoke with Comey and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, he and other CIA officials tried to limit the spread of the Clinton plan intelligence."
 
Back
Top Bottom