Who ever Biden nominates should be labeled a pedo because prove me wrong.![]()
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Retiring
townhall.com
When does the push for Barry or Mikey to the Supreme Court start
Who ever Biden nominates should be labeled a pedo because prove me wrong.![]()
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Retiring
townhall.com
When does the push for Barry or Mikey to the Supreme Court start
Check DOT/FAANot sure exactly who he is alluding to at each argument or assumption he details but to control the gatekeepers is to control the system save for revolution
The military is a great example. There are high level patriots, probably not a lot 0-7 and above but not "everyone" is a sociopath or sellout or coward or willing to do anything if ordered
However, the military is obviously a top down organization that prioritizes obedience and order following with the ultimate outs being resignation'dismisal, Fort Leavenworth or worse
If you control the top, you control the whole thing.
The limiting factor is relatively normal people have to execute the plan. As the plan gets more and more ostensibly odious the likelihood of revolution or mass resistance theoretically increases
Hence the political and vax purges. Soon, the military will be politically ready to target the American people imo
My baseline isn't everyone in government is evil. It's the high level people are and at least a vast majority are either complicit or unwilling to take the risk of resisting
I have said everyone in Congress is controlled. I don't believe any true outsider exists in the halls of Congress
But it's really not an important point provided we agree the majority and probably vast majority are controlled by hostile interest and/or unwilling to combat the hostile interest
As we all know, voting out Marxism and dismantling leviathan requires at least a majority. We don't have that and aren't getting it via elections
It's a straw man argument you've @Law Abiding Citizen made but we probably agree on the essential points
quote:
Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use. Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective. On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.
I believe the Chinese call it getting a Biden!![]()
U.S. diplomatic officials in China were asked to submit to anal swab COVID-19 testing by the Chinese government, according to records from the U.S. Department of State.
The documents, obtained by Judicial Watch in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department, revealed one of the U.S. employees tested was given a COVID-19 anal swab test "at his apartment."
LINK
Did you read the part where Psaki said that Brandon did not try and force Breyer to leave before the elections? Well she said that Brandon did not do that, which we all know means that Brandon or one of his bosses did exactly that.![]()
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Retiring
townhall.com
When does the push for Barry or Mikey to the Supreme Court start
If republicans had balls, they would welcome either to be the nominee. They could then question them under oath in front of the entire world. I am not so sure either Mike or Barry want that.![]()
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Retiring
townhall.com
When does the push for Barry or Mikey to the Supreme Court start
If republicans had balls, they would welcome either to be the nominee. They could then question them under oath in front of the entire world. I am not so sure either Mike or Barry want that.
What is holding gold/silver back now? Both have come off of previous highs and now are just middling around within a percent or two in the face of record inflation/currency devaluation around the globe coupled with volatility in the markets I'd think these safe havens would be moving upwards.
What is holding gold/silver back now? Both have come off of previous highs and now are just middling around within a percent or two in the face of record inflation/currency devaluation around the globe coupled with volatility in the markets I'd think these safe havens would be moving upwards.
What is holding gold/silver back now? Both have come off of previous highs and now are just middling around within a percent or two in the face of record inflation/currency devaluation around the globe coupled with volatility in the markets I'd think these safe havens would be moving upwards.
Per John Podesta and Alex Jones.I bet that room stinks of desperation and rotten fish
Why are they retiring?Check DOT/FAA
LOTS of high level officials starting to “retire.”
No its not. There are legitimate questions about who is "unvaccinated" in this context, but the data are pretty overwhelming on this point.It does not.
This is one of the biggest lies throughout this shit fest.
There is a ton of data, both in this country and around the world that show that the vaccine does provide some protection against severe illness. Your entire argument is based on doubts (definition of "unvaccinated", etc) to invalidate all of the data. These doubts are warranted, but they simply connote explain away the rest of the data.You Cannot Prove That Unless You Live in a Dual Universe
No its not. There are legitimate questions about who is "unvaccinated" in this context, but the data are pretty overwhelming on this point.
There is a ton of data, both in this country and around the world that show that the vaccine does provide some protection against severe illness. Your entire argument is based on doubts (definition of "unvaccinated", etc) to invalidate all of the data. These doubts are warranted, but they simply connote explain away the rest of the data.
What you're doing is similar to those who toss out the data in VAERS. Yes, there are reasons to be skeptical of the VAERS data. For example, anyone can submit a report and claim that the vaccine made them grow an eyeball in the middle of their forehead. Still, the volume of the data in VAERS is hard to discount with specific issues like reporting error and the "correlation does not imply causation" issues. The numbers are just too big. The same principle applies with the vaccine data.
It is perfectly fine to say that the vaccine is helpful for some people and also acknowledge that there are adverse effects from the vaccine and that the vaccine immunity is inferior to natural immunity. All of these things are true.
The debate is moot as these are NOT vaccines. Call them shots, jabs, experimental gene therapies, Fauci's gold, or shit in a syringe but stop calling them vaccines. SKOL!No its not. There are legitimate questions about who is "unvaccinated" in this context, but the data are pretty overwhelming on this point.
There is a ton of data, both in this country and around the world that show that the vaccine does provide some protection against severe illness. Your entire argument is based on doubts (definition of "unvaccinated", etc) to invalidate all of the data. These doubts are warranted, but they simply connote explain away the rest of the data.
What you're doing is similar to those who toss out the data in VAERS. Yes, there are reasons to be skeptical of the VAERS data. For example, anyone can submit a report and claim that the vaccine made them grow an eyeball in the middle of their forehead. Still, the volume of the data in VAERS is hard to discount with specific issues like reporting error and the "correlation does not imply causation" issues. The numbers are just too big. The same principle applies with the vaccine data.
It is perfectly fine to say that the vaccine is helpful for some people and also acknowledge that there are adverse effects from the vaccine and that the vaccine immunity is inferior to natural immunity. All of these things are true.
What's in the vaccine?No its not. There are legitimate questions about who is "unvaccinated" in this context, but the data are pretty overwhelming on this point.
There is a ton of data, both in this country and around the world that show that the vaccine does provide some protection against severe illness. Your entire argument is based on doubts (definition of "unvaccinated", etc) to invalidate all of the data. These doubts are warranted, but they simply connote explain away the rest of the data.
What you're doing is similar to those who toss out the data in VAERS. Yes, there are reasons to be skeptical of the VAERS data. For example, anyone can submit a report and claim that the vaccine made them grow an eyeball in the middle of their forehead. Still, the volume of the data in VAERS is hard to discount with specific issues like reporting error and the "correlation does not imply causation" issues. The numbers are just too big. The same principle applies with the vaccine data.
It is perfectly fine to say that the vaccine is helpful for some people and also acknowledge that there are adverse effects from the vaccine and that the vaccine immunity is inferior to natural immunity. All of these things are true.
truthcomestolight.com
I agree that the Covid vaccines are not sanitizing vaccines like Polio, Measles, etc. They're more like Flu vaccines. If you don't want to call them "vaccines", that's fine, but that doesn't change the argument.The debate is moot as these are NOT vaccines. Call them shots, jabs, experimental gene therapies, Fauci's gold, or shit in a syringe but stop calling them vaccines. SKOL!
It's my understanding that traditional vaccine manufacturing techniques didn't scale well. The mRNA technique does because it turns the inoculated into factories. I think the institutions in this country (it's different in other countries) completely ignore natural immunity because you can't make money on natural immunity. The CDC is only just now saying what we've been saying for at least 1.5 years now: natural immunity is better than vaccine immunity. They have to because the data are overwhelming. Hopefully this growing realization will help defeat any remaining vaccine mandates.What's in the vaccine?
Can you explain the logistics of this supposed warp speed manufacturing?
Why do these institutions discovering this data not blare the supremacy or importance of natural immunity?
Believe the numbers, there's just so much of it is a rough approach but I salute your soldiering
Nobody here is above questioning. Let him show us the data that strongly supports the idea that the vaccines are completely ineffective.Uh uh.
What's changed? As historically that's incorrect. I can remember buying silver as a teen around $5/oz. & gold around $300. Which I guess they don't actually move (outside of quick spikes/dips) it's the value of the currencies that actually moves.Gold and silver are never going to do anything
What is holding gold/silver back now? Both have come off of previous highs and now are just middling around within a percent or two in the face of record inflation/currency devaluation around the globe coupled with volatility in the markets I'd think these safe havens would be moving upwards.
We do it so we can maintain military bases in all parts of the world.So why is the American Taxpayer Paying For Defense of the EU via NATO?
How many greasy American Politicians are on the NATO Kickback scam and payola.
The EU has the 3rd largest economy in the world and the US Taxpayer pays for their Defense.
NATO should have ended when the USSR collapsed.
![]()
Sasse: Germany Has 'De Facto' Exited NATO
Monday, during Hugh Hewitt's nationally syndicated radio broadcast, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) reacted to the ongoing heightened situation between Russia and Ukraine, which some are suggesting will end with Russia invading Ukraine. | Clipswww.breitbart.com
What's changed? As historically that's incorrect. I can remember buying silver as a teen around $5/oz. & gold around $300. Which I guess they don't actually move (outside of quick spikes/dips) it's the value of the currencies that actually moves.
I agree. In 1920/30 gold was 20/oz approx. A man could buy a reasonable 3 pc suit for that oz of gold at that time.What's changed? As historically that's incorrect. I can remember buying silver as a teen around $5/oz. & gold around $300. Which I guess they don't actually move (outside of quick spikes/dips) it's the value of the currencies that actually moves.
Yah if the USA loses reserve currency status, Gold will hit 8-10,000 perhaps more per ozThe price of silver is artificially controlled by one of the major banks. They own such a large share they are able to do this
Depends what you think it proves. Overall hospitalization rate (compared to entire population) is higher now than before the vaccine. Your risk of hospitalization if you have COVID is extremely small whether vaxxed or not, but slightly better if you're vaxxed. But the evidence is now conclusive that the vax is completely ineffective at reducing transmission. It's a therapeutic, not a vaccine. And a dangerous and largely untested one at that.Thats actually not what that graph says. People in the UK are vaxxed at a rate of 9:1 vs unvaxxed, so that graph doesn’t really prove what you think it does.
Don’t know manWhy are they retiring?
Who is replacing them?
What are you expecting me to deduce in lieu of people from DOT/FAA retiring?
I have a bartender that looks exactly like her. Curly hair and all.