The mandate isn’t about the shot. That is purposefull misinformation. People can find other employment if they chose. This is about the Secretary of HHS exercising their right as they see fit. If don’t like it then elect a new POTUS and establish a new Secretary of HHS.I disagree with the Supreme Courts ruling on the Healthcare vaccine mandate. That being said, I can at least respect the decision as it is at least grounded in some logic (unlike so many other democratic policies right now.)
Any mandate for a shot that does nothing to help or hinder your fellow man, is unethical, immoral, and not grounded in science or logic.
These shots do not do what they were advertised to do, so it is CLEAR AS DAY that the government has no idea what they are doing to your body. Any mandate for such medicine is immoral and unethical.
The masking is useless. There is statistical science that shows that mask mandates do not correlate to lower Covid-19 spread.
The testing is useless. Enough said
Anyone pushing masking, testing, or mandates in relation to Covid-19 should be publicly humiliated and shamed.
I think it does resolve it though, just not the way he wanted. If you take any federal money, the executive branch can demand whatever they want of your organization and it’s people.100% This
"It's great. But it doesn't resolve the broader constitutional questions about whether the executive branch or the federal government at all has the lawful power under the Constitution to compel individuals to take on a medical treatment, have to receive a vaccine that they do not want to take. And those were the constitutional questions that we initially litigated in our lawsuits,” he added.
Maybe, maybe not. The only thing we know is that somebody can make a computer model that says we would be goners. That’s like saying we are all goners of an asteroid hits the earth. Maybe, it depends on a lot of factors and information that we as humans dont understand.Yellowstone erupts it won't matter where you live in the US. We're all gone
Really. If the "authorities" came to your door and said come with us because you are unvaxxed. You would not start unloading? Please answer.COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated
Thursday, January 13, 2022
LINK
(Polling was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports.)
How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated?
- 45% of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
- 29% of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
- 59% of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines
Sincerely Fuck these people.
Posting again in case you didn’t see my prior response.Benadryl and milk? Where’s that from?
If this starts happening I think it would be time to light the candle for most fair-minded people.Really. If the "authorities" came to your door and said come with us because you are unvaxxed. You would not start unloading? Please answer.
If you only survey Dems you are going to get some fucked up answers. Half of them are commies but won’t admit it to themselves.COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated
Thursday, January 13, 2022
LINK
(Polling was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports.)
How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated?
- 45% of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
- 29% of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
- 59% of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines
Sincerely Fuck these people.
I will DM you some info that worked for me and who my doctor was.Remind me what it was we had to tell Push Health to get a prescription for Ivermectin
Whatever I had last week involved some sleep sweats and some daytime chills/overheating. But I never once had a fever, and I checked often.Whole family got it as well. It ran through my department. My wife sported a 103 for a day. The weirdest thing we experienced is waking up in a puddle of sweat even though I had no noticible fever.
Other than that, it was a common cold for us for about a week. Nasal drip fort about three days and some chills and hunger suppression. The kids had a fever for two days mostly affecting them in the evening, but little in the afternoon. IDK, if that was Rona? Then whatever...