• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Stop the childish eye and yew or suffer the consequences - apparently I did not make myself clear last time. Also learn to have respect for people that are losing their jobs - be empathetic not a jerk.
I disagree with the Supreme Courts ruling on the Healthcare vaccine mandate. That being said, I can at least respect the decision as it is at least grounded in some logic (unlike so many other democratic policies right now.)

Any mandate for a shot that does nothing to help or hinder your fellow man, is unethical, immoral, and not grounded in science or logic.

These shots do not do what they were advertised to do, so it is CLEAR AS DAY that the government has no idea what they are doing to your body. Any mandate for such medicine is immoral and unethical.

The masking is useless. There is statistical science that shows that mask mandates do not correlate to lower Covid-19 spread.

The testing is useless. Enough said

Anyone pushing masking, testing, or mandates in relation to Covid-19 should be publicly humiliated and shamed.
The mandate isn’t about the shot. That is purposefull misinformation. People can find other employment if they chose. This is about the Secretary of HHS exercising their right as they see fit. If don’t like it then elect a new POTUS and establish a new Secretary of HHS.

Besides the fact that all the science says the shots do REDUCE the spread that determination isn’t up to either. It’s not yore choice to say what is immoral or unethical (We The People as a WHOLE decide that).

The “testing is useless” is hubris never expected to see from . We both know that having a rough guess as to who might be carrying the virus vs who might not be is a YUGE deal.

The people that should be shamed are those that cannot acknowledge the basic logic I’ve laid out because it It’s time to give up the Chyna virus is no big deal schtick especially since we have people ITT who are on death’s door with it.

The logic says it’s time to acknowledge that yew and others were wrong about the jabs and the severity of the virus and pivot to keeping the hysteria alive thru 2024. That way we get the 🐐 back and can prep Ivanka or Don Jr. for their 8 years so that the Dims don’t regain power and rights under The Constitution.
 
100% This

"It's great. But it doesn't resolve the broader constitutional questions about whether the executive branch or the federal government at all has the lawful power under the Constitution to compel individuals to take on a medical treatment, have to receive a vaccine that they do not want to take. And those were the constitutional questions that we initially litigated in our lawsuits,” he added.
I think it does resolve it though, just not the way he wanted. If you take any federal money, the executive branch can demand whatever they want of your organization and it’s people.
 
Yellowstone erupts it won't matter where you live in the US. We're all gone
Maybe, maybe not. The only thing we know is that somebody can make a computer model that says we would be goners. That’s like saying we are all goners of an asteroid hits the earth. Maybe, it depends on a lot of factors and information that we as humans dont understand.
 


IconLOL.gif
He just torched the right for like two weeks straight. Eat of a bag of dicks, China Joe.
1642281117500.png
 
 
COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated

Thursday, January 13, 2022

LINK

(Polling was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports.)

How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated?

- 45%
of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

- 29% of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

- 59% of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines

Sincerely Fuck these people.
 
COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated

Thursday, January 13, 2022

LINK

(Polling was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports.)

How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated?

- 45%
of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

- 29% of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

- 59% of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines

Sincerely Fuck these people.
Really. If the "authorities" came to your door and said come with us because you are unvaxxed. You would not start unloading? Please answer.
 
COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated

Thursday, January 13, 2022

LINK

(Polling was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports.)

How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated?

- 45%
of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

- 29% of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

- 59% of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines

Sincerely Fuck these people.
If you only survey Dems you are going to get some fucked up answers. Half of them are commies but won’t admit it to themselves.
 
Whole family got it as well. It ran through my department. My wife sported a 103 for a day. The weirdest thing we experienced is waking up in a puddle of sweat even though I had no noticible fever.
Other than that, it was a common cold for us for about a week. Nasal drip fort about three days and some chills and hunger suppression. The kids had a fever for two days mostly affecting them in the evening, but little in the afternoon. IDK, if that was Rona? Then whatever...
Whatever I had last week involved some sleep sweats and some daytime chills/overheating. But I never once had a fever, and I checked often.
 
Last edited:

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom