Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Remember the truth about 9/11

MalO

Elite
Joined
Nov 15, 2022
Messages
775
Youtube scrubbed conspiracy theory content from its platform a while back, but you can still find videos there that show the slow motion collapse as long as they are presented neutrally and don't present any theories.





Go full screen and watch the sides of the tower BELOW the collapsing floors. You will see small explosions below the collapsing floors in both videos. Why are there small explosions erupting out of the tower before the ceiling collapses down onto those floors?

Videos about thermite residue have also been scrubbed from Youtube. Posts about thermite residue are treated as conspiracy theory. But it's a fact that thermite residue was found in the ruins of the collapsed towers. Scientists analyzed the residue, confirmed it was thermite, and published their findings in scientific journals.


What was the motivation to destroy the towers?

Lucky Larry Silverstein

^ Larry Silverstein owned the twin towers and found out that they needed asbestos removal. The towers had a huge amount of asbestos that would have cost hundreds of millions to safely clean up. Asbestos removal requires airtight conditions and nobody can occupy the floor where asbestos removal is taking place. Meaning not only would he have to pay for the removal, he would lose rent from his occupants during the removal. It would have bankrupted him.

If you are a rich man and have no moral compass, and are willing to do absolutely anything to continue being rich, what would you do?

Interview of Rabbi Finkelstein

^ On the day that the towers fell, for some reason all 3000 Jewish people who worked at the towers did not show up to work that day. All of them. Why?
 

ernestdefoe

Poster
Joined
Aug 3, 2024
Messages
28
All I know is I was in the Navy stationed at Naval Air Station Sigonella on the island of Sicily when 9/11 happened. I know we went to immediate base lock down and missle launchers were setup around both bases and a fighter squadron was brought in because they had intel we were a target too because all cargo that was goes to the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf came through that base.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,778
What was the motivation to destroy the towers?
A blood sacrifice to satan. .............. it is that simple to begin with......to control lithium mining in the region.........to flood our streets with heroin..........


that morning I was on the way the Myrtle Beach SC to party with some girls that we had met previous. At the time, all we had were pagers. Got the page, and was in country before I even new it it seemed.

I feel bad for things done to the AFG people because of this lie.

One day they will burn, hopefully I will not
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
All I know is I was in the Navy stationed at Naval Air Station Sigonella on the island of Sicily when 9/11 happened. I know we went to immediate base lock down and missle launchers were setup around both bases and a fighter squadron was brought in because they had intel we were a target too because all cargo that was goes to the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf came through that base.
WhatsUp Ernie? I was training steel truck drivers at the same time in Myrtle Beach. Small world. My Grandma was from Sicily. Are you my Grandpa?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
Here is what I "know" / heard about it.

Those towers were constructed using a newish tech of poly bolts in certain locations.
Never expecting a fire to be possible due to extensive sprinkler systems.

The jet fuel from the planes leaked down into the building and the fire spread.
Once these very large poly bolts melted it was all over for that building.
It was designed to fall like that in order to protect the surrounding buildings in the event of something like this.

Nothing here is facts just what I heard.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,778
Here is what I "know" / heard about it.

Those towers were constructed using a newish tech of poly bolts in certain locations.
Never expecting a fire to be possible due to extensive sprinkler systems.

The jet fuel from the planes leaked down into the building and the fire spread.
Once these very large poly bolts melted it was all over for that building.
It was designed to fall like that in order to protect the surrounding buildings in the event of something like this.

Nothing here is facts just what I heard.
None of this is true. Not even close.

Whoever you "heard" this from knows nothing about construction, or much anything else for that matter. If the buildings, and ones like it were made with these :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: "Poly Bolts":ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:", they would not stand long enough for them to complete the first floor of construction probably not even the first beam.

This is probably one of the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

The Twin Towers were held together by countless hot pressed rivets, some were 100 lbs each. Nearly impervious to heat. That an of course welding.

The steel "I" columns were measured in "tons per foot"


POLY BOLTS....what a crock of shit.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
None of this is true. Not even close.

Whoever you "heard" this from knows nothing about construction, or much anything else for that matter. If the buildings, and ones like it were made with these :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: "Poly Bolts":ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:", they would not stand long enough for them to complete the first floor of construction probably not even the first beam.

This is probably one of the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

The Twin Towers were held together by countless hot pressed rivets, some were 100 lbs each. Nearly impervious to heat. That an of course welding.

The steel "I" columns were measured in "tons per foot"


POLY BOLTS....what a crock of shit.

They were only there to allow the collapse if necessary. They were never supposed to be exposed to fire.

Most of the building was steel and post tension just like all skyscrappers.

These buildings were designed to collapse like this in the event they wanted them to or the event that something like this or a tornado happens.

That much you should understand.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,778
They were only there to allow the collapse if necessary. They were never supposed to be exposed to fire.

Most of the building was steel and post tension just like all skyscrappers.

These buildings were designed to collapse like this in the event they wanted them to or the event that something like this or a tornado happens.

That much you should understand.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Maybe in your reality, but in the one that everyones else lives in, your above statement is BS. Hilarious how an individual or group of individuals can believe such BS
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Maybe in your reality, but in the one that everyones else lives in, your above statement is BS. Hilarious how an individual or group of individuals can believe such BS

I guess your not interested in discussing the topic.
Instead you just take a shit on anyone that offers a different perspective.

So tell us then. What the "little explosions" were ? Obviously you think you know something about it but your not discussing.

What do you think you know about what happened ?

Ah.. I noticed you said this..
> A blood sacrifice to satan. .............. it is that simple to begin with......to control lithium mining in the region.........to flood our streets with heroin..........

Wow great job a deducing how this conspiracy effects us.
At first I was wondering if you were going the liberal route of forcing the war with middle east.
You sound like a Karen. Are you a guy or a girl ?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,778
I guess your not interested in discussing the topic.
To the point of what you said about "poly bolts" there is no discussion. It would be the same thing to discuss as using spaghetti noodle to connect steel members together. Both as way out of the realm of possibility. So no, I am not interested in discussing such bullshit. "Taking a shit" on bullshit is fair game. Either way, you conveyed this "poly bolt" notion as something you heard, not your own POV.
I guess your not interested in discussing the topic.
Instead you just take a shit on anyone that offers a different perspective.
Untrue, that why I have this thread, just because I am not interested in bullshit, does not mean I want to discuss a topic.
So tell us then. What the "little explosions" were ? Obviously you think you know something about it but your not discussing.
I was not there, but I have seen countless videos of the events and did see many thing that were or could be up to conjecture. If there were little explosions, they would have been nothing inherant to the construction of the building......meaning the cause would have been added to the building as a separate system. The little "poofs" could very well have been air being expelled from the above floors pancaking on each other. That is the most likely cause, not explosives. Explosives would be needed at the main columns, which were more centrally located in the building construction.
What do you think you know about what happened ?
Beyond the normal conspiracy theories, that are rooted in some truth, whereas the official story, by definition cannot be rooted in truth, I do have some very specific knowledge of demolitions, and explosives. Not in a chemistry based way, but in a tactical way. Further, I have 20+ years of cumulative time in the construction industry and know what these things are made of, and how they are made.

So what do I think i know? I know that the official story, is part truth and nothing more. And the only reason it is part truth, is just to sell the story. There were two planes that struck the 2 buildings that day, after that, the story is false.

I did not even think about it, until about 2013 I think, when I learned of building 7, which is the smoking gun of the operation.
At first I was wondering if you were going the liberal route of forcing the war with middle east.
It does have to do with that, but the implications were more directed at the American public. Making war in the middle east is easy as pie, one needs no excuse.

I am far from a liberal.
You sound like a Karen. Are you a guy or a girl ?
Girl

Ah.. I noticed you said this..
> A blood sacrifice to satan.
Thanks for noticing
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
So what you got construction experience you don't know shit about how skyscrappers are designed to collapse and not topple.
What were you a day laborer or something ?
Now your a expert and your opinion is more valid than anyone ? BULLSHIT

You know who told me about the poly bolts was a engineer who designed a multi family project that I built as a superintendent.
And something you will never find on your internet. Why ? Lawsuits.

Did you think it was a bunch of camel jockeys that flew planes into a building with no structural knowledge of it and not knowing they would colapse like that ?
I don't care to convince you of anything. I was offering my opinion.

If you want to tell yourself you know the answers and anyone else is bullshit, thats fine. You be you.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,778
So what you got construction experience you don't know shit about how skyscrappers are designed
No not really, I am a licensed contractor in NC who has worked extensively in mega buildings (as they are called in the industry) as well as others. My license is unlimited, which is to say I am certified to do work in any size project. I have been in the field for all of 8 years since I was 16. I am 48.

Those 8 years 1996 -2004 were spent in the US military where for the lion share of time, I spent on a what was referred to as Direct Action Team, in a unit which you have not heard of I am sure, within the Army's 82nd Airborne Division. There, amongst many other things, I was trained in demolition of structures using explosives, namely bridges, (although the concept for a building is similar). Working very closely and in conjunction with Army sapper teams.

So yeah I can say that on this particular subject, I know more than the average person.


Now your a expert and your opinion is more valid than anyone ?
No not anyone, but in this particular subject.....you for sure.
who told me about the poly bolts was a engineer who designed a multi family project that I built as a superintendent
Told you huh? But you never saw one. Hmm. Lawsuit you say, you bet your ass there would be. Multi family? So townhouses and condos, maybe 6 stories. Nowhere near the same ballpark in construction. If that engineer really told you that, I think he was pulling your chain.
I don't care to convince you of anything.
I can tell. Here is the truth. You displayed and still do not display anything that could be conceived as knowledge on the subject, and formulated a conclusion based on "bad intelligence", then go onto a website and spew that bullshit in hopes that some one will like you and what you say. Further hoping that someone with some real knowledge on the subject would not notice. Well, you miscalculated that one as well.

I do not intend to be harsh, but this is a serious subject, for a serious conversation.


Beyond the technical portions of the event, what do you think happened? In short, do believe the official story, or do you believe there is something more to it?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
What you think @Rebarcock ??

You are a steel man right? Ever heard of polybolts? holding a million tons of steel and concrete up, as a mechanism for a building to perfectly collapse? Make sense right?
Hey its fine.

One conspiracy theory is as good as the next. When you step down that trail the truth is easy to be missused.

Your blowing out of proportion what they said.
They were in specific locations. Not holding up the whole building.

Why do you think they targeted the middle upper portion ?
IT was well planned. Once the top part gave loose the thing demolished itself.

And I know for sure there are hundreds of thousands of people who will side with you on this.
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
What you think @Rebarcock ??

You are a steel man right? Ever heard of polybolts? holding a million tons of steel and concrete up, as a mechanism for a building to perfectly collapse? Make sense right?
No haven't heard of polybolts. Although poly and plastic polymers are getting more and more advanced.
Couple years ago I read about some new plastic that was stronger than steel and iir about 20% weight of the steel equal. So I could see this type of an application being brought to market now. If they are truly stronger it is probably a good deal. I'd imagine the products are cheaper than steel also. When I get a bit ill try and find out something
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
What you think @Rebarcock ??

You are a steel man right? Ever heard of polybolts? holding a million tons of steel and concrete up, as a mechanism for a building to perfectly collapse? Make sense right?
Looking back at posts I can say w 1000% certainty that poly bolts were not used in original construction of the twin towers. The technology was not available to commercial products when the towers were built. At best the tech would have been in university and nasa settings.
My Father used to run the steel mill where they fabricated the rebar for the twin towers. He just told me they supplied the anchor bolts for the job too. All steel bolts and rivets. The plastic tech just wasn't available when construction was on going
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
They are about a foot in diameter

specific information about the anchor bolts used in the Twin Towers is limited, but the search results provide insight into the types of anchor bolts and their characteristics.

The anchor bolts mentioned in the search results are:

NexGen2 Blind Bolt Assembly, U-Bolts, J-Bolts, Step Bolt Adapters, and Structural Bolts from Allfasteners, designed for the modification of cell towers.
Anchor Bolts from US Tower, available in 4 models (1/2″ x 10″, 3/4″ x 27″, 1″ x 27″, and 1 1/8″ x 27″) with 3 nuts, used on various tower models.
These anchor bolts were likely used for securing tower components, such as climbing brackets, antennas, and other equipment, to the structural steel framework of the Twin Towers. The bolts were designed to provide high strength and durability, with corrosion-resistant finishes and customizable options for ensuring a proper fit.

It’s important to note that the exact specifications and manufacturers of the anchor bolts used in the Twin Towers may not be publicly available due to proprietary or security reasons. The information provided above is based on general descriptions of anchor bolts used in the telecommunications industry and may not be specific to the Twin Towers.

Given the high-stress and high-load conditions of the Twin Towers, it’s likely that the anchor bolts were made of high-strength steel alloys, such as A36 or A572, or possibly even higher-strength materials like A690 or A913. However, without direct information or official documentation, it’s impossible to confirm the exact material composition of the anchor bolts.

A product the size you are talking about in your post is more for flexibility and repositioning for earthquake preparedness I think.
It definitely isn't to hold the structural integrity together
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Messages
188
Well the way they were describe to me was.
New technology, stronger than steel because of the sheer factor of steel.
They were meant to be removable to weaken the structure if necessary.
And I don't want to go further on it. It's really a big deal a lot of people died and it was horrible. I blame 100% the middle east.
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
Well the way they were describe to me was.
New technology, stronger than steel because of the sheer factor of steel.
They were meant to be removable to weaken the structure if necessary.
And I don't want to go further on it. It's really a big deal a lot of people died and it was horrible. I blame 100% the middle east.
I'm not diminishing your position. And with any new and cutting edge building they use the newest techniques. I don't fab for skyscrapers. Biggest jobs we have are big hotels in Wilmington, Myrtle Beach, and Charleston. So wven though I am skeptical of their use it doesn't mean I am correct by any stretch. My limited knowledge of plastic development timelines just logically makes it not probable.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom