Did OJ Simpson do it?

[OTD Sports]

 

[Rebarcock.]

I'd think so. He got away with it.beating the Justice system is fun. It sucks but if you win it is fun

 

[sanction]

SHEE-IT

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

He did it.

 

[ChingChongDingDong]

He did it.

Not what a jury of his peers says you communist cunt hair.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

The evidence was overwhelmingly against him. I have no doubt he did it

but............

@ChingChongDingDong is correct. A duly appointed jury found him not guilty, the state did not meet its burden to prove to a jury that he was guilty. 1 innocent in jail is worth 100 criminals on the street.

What I do not agree with, was the civil trial, whereas he lost all his money, and was found "civilly liable" for the deaths.

 

[TheResister]

The evidence was overwhelmingly against him. I have no doubt he did it

but............

@ChingChongDingDong is correct. A duly appointed jury found him not guilty, the state did not meet its burden to prove to a jury that he was guilty. 1 innocent in jail is worth 100 criminals on the street.

What I do not agree with, was the civil trial, whereas he lost all his money, and was found "civilly liable" for the deaths.

I don't think he did it. Here's why:

BEFORE O.J. is accused of having killed that guy, he caught his wife giving him a blow job on the couch with O.J.'s kids upstairs. If I were a man and were going to kill a guy in a fit of rage, it would have been then and there. But, O.J. didn't. Then again, there might be a thinking process that is very different between a White guy and a Black one.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

I don't think he did it. Here's why:

BEFORE O.J. is accused of having killed that guy, he caught his wife giving him a blow job on the couch with O.J.'s kids upstairs. If I were a man and were going to kill a guy in a fit of rage, it would have been then and there. But, O.J. didn't. Then again, there might be a thinking process that is very different between a White guy and a Black one.

That is surprising that you think that he did not do it, based on that. Of course, they were a very loose couple. Who knows. Those kind of people live by different rules than regular folks.

It was a firestorm of bad decisions by the prosecution, great tactics by the defense, and a ticking time bomb after the LA Riots that.

But he is innocent, found to be a true verdict at trial and therefore he is square with the house.

Two key mistakes by the prosecution:

1.) Calling Fuhrman to the stand (Clark)
2.) Having OJ try on the gloves ( Darden)

If the above had not happened, he would have been likely convicted.

 

[d-tiger45]

I got Dan Patrick in the 2023 death pool

 

[TheResister]

That is surprising that you think that he did not do it, based on that. Of course, they were a very loose couple. Who knows. Those kind of people live by different rules than regular folks.

It was a firestorm of bad decisions by the prosecution, great tactics by the defense, and a ticking time bomb after the LA Riots that.

But he is innocent, found to be a true verdict at trial and therefore he is square with the house.

Two key mistakes by the prosecution:

1.) Calling Fuhrman to the stand (Clark)
2.) Having OJ try on the gloves ( Darden)

If the above had not happened, he would have been likely convicted.

What makes you think the prosecution didn't screw up on purpose? Good lawyers never ask questions or pose scenarios unless they know the probable answer in advance.

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

The evidence was overwhelmingly against him. I have no doubt he did it

but............

@ChingChongDingDong is correct. A duly appointed jury found him not guilty, the state did not meet its burden to prove to a jury that he was guilty. 1 innocent in jail is worth 100 criminals on the street.

What I do not agree with, was the civil trial, whereas he lost all his money, and was found "civilly liable" for the deaths.

Not being found guilty doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. They are two separate entities.

What makes you think the prosecution didn't screw up on purpose? Good lawyers never ask questions or pose scenarios unless they know the probable answer in advance.

Don’t act like you know anything about what us lawyers do.

 

[TheResister]

Not being found guilty doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. They are two separate entities.

Don’t act like you know anything about what is lawyers do.

You still trying to pretend you're Perry Mason? I've been in so many courtrooms and fought so many cases that your dumb ass couldn't fathom what it is I did. I know more about what lawyers do than you can even pretend to do. Only one of us has a legal education / experience and it damn sure isn't you.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Not being found guilty doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. They are two separate entities.

Sure, but in this country that does not matter. He was proven innocent, for all intents a purposes he did not do it.

The court of public opinion does not play by the same rules or course.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

I got Dan Patrick in the 2023 death pool

dicaprio

 

[weaponoffreedom]

What makes you think the prosecution didn't screw up on purpose? Good lawyers never ask questions or pose scenarios unless they know the probable answer in advance.

Well, you have stated you opinion that he did not do it, correct?
Why would the prosecution have to fumble on purpose if the did not do it? If there was not the requisite evidence to convict, why would they have to play both sides?

It is a good point however, most had to benefit from him getting off. Clark and Darden both quit and made a bunch of money elsewhere.

Who knows, 1000%, no one. But he was found not guilty in our justice system. done.

 

[TheResister]

Well, you have stated you opinion that he did not do it, correct?
Why would the prosecution have to fumble on purpose if the did not do it? If there was not the requisite evidence to convict, why would they have to play both sides?

It is a good point however, most had to benefit from him getting off. Clark and Darden both quit and made a bunch of money elsewhere.

Who knows, 1000%, no one. But he was found not guilty in our justice system. done.

For the most part you answered your own question. If presented correctly, the evidence might suggest O.J. did it. Why would prosecutors deliberately fumble a case? If they won there'd be no controversy for them to cash in on. That's just a theory, but I learned a long time ago that, in court, you never ask a question unless you know the answer in advance and that is especially true of any question that begins with the word why.

Actually, I never paid any attention to that case. The big fact that stuck out was as stated. The time when O.J. catches his wife in the act and does nothing and later goes into a rage seemed unnatural. Then again, they could have had a really bizarre alternative lifestyle.

 

[Joe Kings]

You still trying to pretend you're Perry Mason? I've been in so many courtrooms and fought so many cases that your dumb ass couldn't fathom what it is I did. I know more about what lawyers do than you can even pretend to do. Only one of us has a legal education / experience and it damn sure isn't you.

Paralegal?

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

You still trying to pretend you're Perry Mason? I've been in so many courtrooms and fought so many cases that your dumb ass couldn't fathom what it is I did. I know more about what lawyers do than you can even pretend to do. Only one of us has a legal education / experience and it damn sure isn't you.

 

[AgEngDawg]

Does a bear chit in the woods?

 

[TheResister]

Paralegal?

That was too funny. When I was working in immigration law and arguing with idiots that wanted to debate "legal" versus illegal immigration and the nutty wall idea, I couldn't get a swinging dick to come to my office and spend a couple of days watching us work immigration cases.

Before that I was a Justice of the Peace. They are now called magistrates (small claims court judges.) I spent a career doing that kind of shit.

After watching the right (formerly the patriot movement, for lack of a more descriptive adjective) sell out to the left and socialists, I went back to college and got a degree in theology. I still tinker with the legal stuff, but would never, under any circumstances become affiliated with the ABA.

Jake is mad because he got outed as not only not being a lawyer, it's not even a single individual. As for me, in the 1980s and 1990s my own hometown newspaper once said I was the most quoted man in Georgia. Any time you want some REAL action, come see me. My last project was drafting a bill to defund the BATFE and it got introduced into Congress by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Most of my work sits and doesn't get acted on because most of America is glued to the damn Internet and too lazy to work for changes in legislation.

 

[IAmDamagedGoods]

Yes!

 

[Joe King]

Ok all you Perry Mason's, if he did it, why didn't the glove that they said was worn by the murderer, fit him?

 

[ShaolinNole]

His son Jason probably did it.

OJ Simpson Conspiracy Theory: Did O.J. Simpson’s Son Kill Nicole Brown And Ron Goldman?

Does the glove fit?

www.yourtango.com

 

[Joe King]

His son Jason probably did it.

OJ Simpson Conspiracy Theory: Did O.J. Simpson’s Son Kill Nicole Brown And Ron Goldman?

Does the glove fit?

www.yourtango.com

The glove is his size.

 

[sanction]

White pussy made him go crazy.

It made me do crazy stuff too. Not that crazy though.

 

[sanction]

Ok all you Perry Mason's, if he did it, why didn't the glove that they said was worn by the murderer, fit him?

Do you know anything about wet leather drying out ?

Got Damn son