Master Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Community megathread
Ashton Forbes is going to be the happiest dude on Earth if we announce we have gravity manipulating energy sources.
He is saying essentially this is likely reason they took the guy out- and it smells like Trump had a lot to do with it, do NOT fuck with Trump’s economy
I foresee an angry father mass shooting in the near future.
Top 2 down. I watched a pod today with Ed Calderon. He was saying the military has become completely separate from the government. I would say that Shine Bomb has little to do with this and the Mex Military is acting directly with US. He was saying they have vetted units in the Mex military who bring their families to the US while they are working and that they are trained and vetted to extremes here in the US. He thinks it was these units that did the actual capturing.
…but that is not misconduct to the mudslimes. Then again, he is a Jew. Quite a pickle!
It’s simple. Conservative voters hate their corrupt politicians. Liberals love their corrupt politicians.
Jerry Booth
February 17What Tucker Carlson is actually claiming
Tucker Carlson’s core argument is that Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t merely a criminal operating alone, but a node within a trans-national elite power network that functions above elected governments what Carlson refers to as a “supra government.”
In this framing, Epstein’s influence didn’t come primarily from wealth. It came from information, access, and leverage. The persistent lack of meaningful prosecutions is presented not as incompetence, but as evidence of systemic protection for those exposed.
What we know (documented, not controversial)
Jeffrey Epstein maintained extensive ties to politicians, billionaires, intelligence-adjacent figures, royalty, and academics. He received an extraordinarily lenient plea deal in 2008 that remains legally anomalous. Large volumes of evidence were seized devices, files, contacts much of which has never been made public. While associates such as Ghislaine Maxwell were convicted, alleged clients have not been named. By any normal legal standard, this outcome is unusual.
What is plausible (but unproven)
Carlson’s broader claim that informal power networks can override formal institutions is not fringe. Political scientists and intelligence historians widely acknowledge that power often operates through relationships and networks rather than official offices. Intelligence agencies have historically used kompromat, and financial elites routinely influence political outcomes.
Epstein discussing events like the fall of Muammar Gaddafi before they occurred doesn’t require mysticism. It suggests proximity to people with foreknowledge access, not omniscience.
Where Carlson crosses into speculation
There is no hard evidence proving the existence of a single, unified “supra government,” a coordinated Western elite council controlling outcomes, or Epstein acting as an independent power broker rather than an asset, facilitator, or intermediary. At this point, the argument moves from structural critique into grand theory not impossible, but unproven.
Why arrests haven’t happened
A shadow government isn’t required to explain the lack of arrests. Statute limitations, jurisdictional complexity, evidentiary decay, uncooperative witnesses, political risk avoidance, and mutually assured reputational destruction are sufficient. Power often protects itself quietly, without coordination.
The uncomfortable truth
The Epstein case isn’t really about secret rituals. It’s about how modern power is networked, opaque, and risk-averse and how accountability collapses when too many elites are implicated at once.
That’s not cinematic, It’s bureaucratic and it may be worse.
Bottom line Carlson raises legitimate questions about elite protection, but he does not present proof of a supra government. The lack of transparency erodes public trust, and silence, intentional or not benefits those with power.
Similar threads
