[UPDATED] BREAKING: Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed USA v. Letitia James—but NOT on the merits.
The case is assigned to Judge Jamar K. Walker. Judge Currie—specially designated by the Fourth Circuit—ruled Halligan's appointment violated the Appointments Clause. That's it.
NOT vindictive prosecution. NOT "fringe blogger." NOT Pulte misconduct. NOT lack of evidence.
Dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DOJ can re-indict tomorrow.
Full analysis:
https://whitecollarfraud.com/2025/1...ctment-but-not-because-the-evidence-was-weak/
What that means:
✓ DOJ can re-indict tomorrow
✓ No double jeopardy—James was never tried
✓ Evidence stays on the record
✓ Additional properties can be charged
✓ State prosecution still available
✓ IRS enforcement still available
James is NOT exonerated. NOT acquitted. NOT vindicated.
The evidence doesn't disappear:
✓ Her text to her accountant: "I do not want to take deduction. It looks suspicious"
✓ Her tax returns: depreciation deductions (investment property treatment)
✓ Her mortgage documents: swore it was her "second home"
✓ Her financial disclosure: listed as investment on form that says "do NOT list secondary residences"
✓ Her Schedule E: zero personal use days—contradicting the 182.5+ days required by her Second Home Rider
Same year. Contradictory sworn statements. Exposed.
Lowell filed 50 pages attacking:
Me as a "right-wing fringe blogger"
Pulte's "outrageous government conduct"
The investigation as "uncorroborated"
Judge Currie ignored ALL of it.
She ruled on a technicality DOJ can fix in 24 hours.
The cleanest path: Attorney General Bondi can assign any existing Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney from another district to sign the indictment. Case proceeds in EDVA under Judge Walker. Halligan stays on the trial team.
No nomination. No confirmation hearing. No Cannon problems.
The evidence doesn't change. The charges don't change. Only the signature changes.
I'm a registered Democrat. Eric Trump blocked me years ago and still has me blocked. I used only public records. DOJ independently confirmed my findings with James's own subpoenaed documents—evidence
I never had access to.
Documents don't have political affiliations. And neither does fraud.
The dismissal is without prejudice.
The fraud is still fraud.