Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
NBC News

Ryan Routh found guilty in Trump golf course assassination attempt​

Juliette Arcodia
Updated Tue, September 23, 2025 at 9:38 AM CDT
4 min read

223

7852c6983abbd735978bd85c528e9c8a

Ryan Routh found guilty in Trump golf course assassination attempt
FORT PIERCE, Fla. — The trial of Ryan Wesley Routh came to a dramatic end Tuesday when he started stabbing himself in the neck with a pen after a Florida jury found him guilty of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last year on a golf course.

After just two-and-half hours of deliberations, the panel also found Routh guilty of assaulting the Secret Service agent who rousted him from his hiding place and guilty of three federal gun charges stemming from the Sept. 15, 2024, incident.

Routh, who had pleaded not guilty to all the charges, now faces life in prison when he is sentenced.
 
orng_blud said:
NBC News

Ryan Routh found guilty in Trump golf course assassination attempt​

Juliette Arcodia
Updated Tue, September 23, 2025 at 9:38 AM CDT
4 min read

223

7852c6983abbd735978bd85c528e9c8a

Ryan Routh found guilty in Trump golf course assassination attempt
FORT PIERCE, Fla. — The trial of Ryan Wesley Routh came to a dramatic end Tuesday when he started stabbing himself in the neck with a pen after a Florida jury found him guilty of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last year on a golf course.

After just two-and-half hours of deliberations, the panel also found Routh guilty of assaulting the Secret Service agent who rousted him from his hiding place and guilty of three federal gun charges stemming from the Sept. 15, 2024, incident.

Routh, who had pleaded not guilty to all the charges, now faces life in prison when he is sentenced.
Click to expand...
Read he tried to kill himself after guilty verdict with a pen.
 


RE: Antifa

I think it is important that we are all armed with truth-based arguments regarding Antifa, as its enablers and funders on the mainstream Left seek to convince us it does not exist.

So here goes, ten important facts about Antifa:

1. Antifa is a cellular organization. Each cell is kept separate from other cells so that the loss of one cell does not bring down the entire organization. Despite this cellular structure, all cells serve a common purpose of using violence to enforce Marxism on America.

2. For reference, al Qaeda, the Mafia and most terror or organized crime organizations use the same cellular structure as Antifa.

3. The cellular nature of an organization does not mean it is not an "organization."

4. Merely saying you are "anti-fascist" does not make it so. It's like Jeffrey Dahmer saying he is "anti-cannibalism." In reality, Antifa's tactics of violence suppression of alternate views is a classic tactic of 20th Century fascists.

5. Despite the overall cellular organization, various Antifa cells (such as Rose City Antifa) are highly organized with a distinct social media presence, a formal leadership structure, formal training materials and training events and a dedicated communications network.

6. Antifa in 2025 alleges it began in the 1930s in Germany to oppose Hitler (I have no idea if this is true; it might be). Their intent in endlessly repeating this bit of history is to equate peaceful, conservative, religious Americans with Hitler. This sort of cultural xenophobia is what led to Charlie Kirk's assassination.

7. In terms of direct action, Communists and Fascists are indistinguishable. That is why it is fair to say Antifa is itself a fascist organization, as well as being Marxist.

8. The key to shutting down Antifa is to cut off its funding. Like all Marxist organizations, the Democrat Party funds it enforcer arm of Antifa street thugs through a variety of cut-out organizations, both private and public. (Those pallets of bricks don't show up by themselves.) The key to ending the violent, fascist scourge of Antifa rests in the FBI unraveling this web of deceit and funding.

9. Yes, Antifa is by definition a terror organization.

10. Free speech is never violence, and violence is never free speech.

Hope this helps.

I think we have discussed all these points at some time on here. But a nice concise rebuttal to leftists who think they are smart
 
Sgfeer said:
Click to expand...

Do you see it? Trump is neutralizing the Deep State’s playbook.First he cut off their money supply via USAID/foreign aid.

Now he is shutting down their brownshirts (Antifa).Trump is neutralizing their ability to utilize their playbook. With USAID funding shut down and Antifa now a domestic terrorist organization, Soros and the Dems are losing their regime-change/color revolution capabilities.

Trump knows their playbook. He knows what they have planned for when he arrests Deep State actors. So he is cutting off their slush funds, shutting down their sleeper cells (MS-13/Tren de Aragua), and paramilitary groups (Antifa), BEFORE Trump makes his big move.I believe Trump wanting to deploy the National Guard to Dem cities nationwide has a lot to do with Antifa, and other potential sleeper cells/terrorist groups who will be activated if Trump arrests high-profile individuals.

he Deep State have a standing army of Left-wing paramilitary extremists ready to riot and utilize violence against Americans, and Trump knows he must neutralize this threat BEFORE he makes arrests.The plan is coming together.
 


Finally reading Elena Kagan's dissent (along with the other liberal harpies) related to SCOTUS' hold and grant of cert in the president's removal of Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. The Supreme Court is setting up a reversal of Humphrey's Executor, 90-year-old case law that has constrained the president's authority in firing appointees of the executive branch.

The Court is systematically siding with the president in his firing of several Dem appointees on so-called "independent" agencies and boards. This big fight ahead is his removal of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board.

Kagan is very upset that the highest court ultimately will decide that the president is indeed in charge of the executive branch and does not need to give a reason to anyone, including the courts, as to why he is dismissing appointees who wield significant power:"

Earlier this year, the same majority, by the same mechanism, permitted the President to fire without cause members of the National Labor Relations Board, the Merits Systems Protection Board, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Yet the majority, stay order by stay order, has handed full control of all those agencies to the President. He may now remove—so says the majority, though Congress said differently—any member he wishes, for any reason or no reason at all. And he may thereby extinguish the agencies’ bipartisanship and independence."

While these legal battles are no doubt exhausting for the president and his team, his administration is forcing a critical re-examination of the Constitutionality of a shadow fourth branch of government that operates without any oversight by the executive or legislative branches but has continued to earn the support of the judiciary.

Our legal folks wish to weigh in?
 
Sgfeer said:


Finally reading Elena Kagan's dissent (along with the other liberal harpies) related to SCOTUS' hold and grant of cert in the president's removal of Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. The Supreme Court is setting up a reversal of Humphrey's Executor, 90-year-old case law that has constrained the president's authority in firing appointees of the executive branch.

The Court is systematically siding with the president in his firing of several Dem appointees on so-called "independent" agencies and boards. This big fight ahead is his removal of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board.

Kagan is very upset that the highest court ultimately will decide that the president is indeed in charge of the executive branch and does not need to give a reason to anyone, including the courts, as to why he is dismissing appointees who wield significant power:"

Earlier this year, the same majority, by the same mechanism, permitted the President to fire without cause members of the National Labor Relations Board, the Merits Systems Protection Board, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Yet the majority, stay order by stay order, has handed full control of all those agencies to the President. He may now remove—so says the majority, though Congress said differently—any member he wishes, for any reason or no reason at all. And he may thereby extinguish the agencies’ bipartisanship and independence."

While these legal battles are no doubt exhausting for the president and his team, his administration is forcing a critical re-examination of the Constitutionality of a shadow fourth branch of government that operates without any oversight by the executive or legislative branches but has continued to earn the support of the judiciary.

Our legal folks wish to weigh in?
Click to expand...

Looks pretty spot-on to me.
 

Similar threads

Cartoondude135
YouTube TERMINATED my account for NO REASON!
Replies
33
Views
1K
Rva
Rva
Chris Farley
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Welcome to TMAC!
Replies
0
Views
2K
Chris Farley
Chris Farley
Cartoondude135
Help me acquire discontinued sound effect libraries please
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Rebarcock.
Rebarcock.
IAmDamagedGoods
Corrupt law enforcement agency!!! Legal advice/guidance needed!
2 3
Replies
113
Views
9K
Rebarcock.
Rebarcock.
Ponder
Prison Planet Theory - All Aspects of It.
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Rebarcock.
Rebarcock.

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$100.00
Total amount
$500.00
Donate View

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom