Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
LA Times

Supreme Court upholds 'roving patrols' for immigration stops in Los Angeles​

David G. Savage, Sonja Sharp
Mon, September 8, 2025 at 10:49 AM CDT


15.1k
Los Angeles, CA - August 14: Gregory Bovino, Chief Patrol Agent of the El Centro Sector and Commander-Operation At Large CA (center), marches with federal agents to the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building after US Border Patrol agents produced a show of force outside the Japanese American National Museum where Gov. Newsom was holding a redistricting press conference on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, CA. (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

U.S. Border Patrol Sector Chief Gregory Bovino marches with federal agents in downtown Los Angeles in August 2025. (Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)
The Supreme Court ruled Monday for the Trump administration and agreed U.S. immigration agents may stop and detain anyone they suspect is in the U.S. illegally based on little more than their working at a car wash, speaking Spanish or having brown skin.

In a 6-3 vote, the justices granted an emergency appeal and lifted a Los Angeles judge's order that barred "roving patrols" from snatching people off Southern California streets based on how they look, what language they speak, what work they do or where they happen to be.

The decision is a significant victory for President Trump, clearing the way for his oft-promised "largest Mass Deportation Operation" in American history.


The court's conservatives issued a brief, unsigned order that freezes the district judge's restraining order indefinitely and frees immigration agents from it. As a practical matter, it gives immigration agents broad authority to stop people who they think may be here illegally.

Although Monday's order is not a final ruling, it strongly signals the Supreme Court will not uphold strict limits on the authority of immigration agents to stop people for questioning.

The Supreme Court has been sharply criticized in recent weeks for handing down orders with no explanation. Perhaps for that reason, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote a 10-page opinion to explain the decision.

He said federal law says "immigration officers 'may briefly detain' an individual 'for questioning' if they have 'a reasonable suspicion, based on specific articulable facts, that the person being questioned ... is an alien illegally in the United States.'"
 


John Solomon is now reporting that the FBI has opened an investigation into whether its own agents obstructed “politically sensitive cases,” including the cover-up of the Anthony Weiner laptop.

He says a grand jury has been convened, and some of the evidence will be delivered in a bombshell notification to Congress later this month.

I would say that the grand jury has already convened, reviewed the evidence, determined a crime was committed, and recommended indictments. That is why JS is now reporting on it. JMO
 
Germany has fallen. This is their former foreign minster and now current rep at the UN, making Sex and City covers for instagram. She is a member of the Green Party and has voted for carbon taxes and mass migration. Things are bad here but the leaders in Europe aren't serious people.

 
ummm, that one is scary. Cause maybe? but the voice would have been the signal, but loud club might not make it out. It is the one your friends can talk about forever while you cry in shame at all social gatherings. Unless you are into it like it says. @GarneT&GolD1978 what say you?
Since I’m not into dudes, I’ve got a method I use.

I can always tell by examining the crotchal region. If I feel a cock, I’m pretty sure it’s a dude. If I don’t feel a cock, but she’s got a hairy butthole for a pussy, I’m also pretty sure it’s a dude.

This is my method, but I don’t have it patented - so feel free to use what you like. Hope this helps.
 
Heard a stat today when they were talking about the ratios of black on white vs white on black crime. If we had 3 strike rules across the country for convicted felons and kept those people behind bars we would reduce violent crime by 80%. 80% of crime is committed by repeat offenders. It would be sooooo easy to fix this problem
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$400.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom