The Unspoken & The Unheard: What You Do Not See
Have you noticed what Donald Trump detractors are not saying?
He is a war criminal for bombing Iran.
He should be tried in Military Tribunals.
Iran should file a ICC report.
The UN should put sanctions on the US.
Somebody should start impeachment proceedings.
Iran should call for reparations for this unjust act.
Etc.
Do you want to know why?
-This would require proof that Iran didn't have any nuclear weapons.
-This would actually prove congress or media to be complicit.
-This would exonerate D. Trump and embarrass his critics.
-This is the chokehold you do not even see with your physical eyes that D. Trump has everyone in.
Do you still not see the genius?
Trump’s detractors politicians, media, and activists have refrained from labeling him a war criminal or demanding legal repercussions, despite the strike’s scale (e.g., 420,000 pounds of explosives on Fordo, Natanz, Isfahan). This silence is deafening given the usual playbook.
• No War Criminal Charge: No prominent figure (e.g., AOC, Schumer) has called Trump a war criminal, a term flung at Bush post-Iraq.
• No Military Tribunal Demand: No push for military justice, despite the strike’s military nature, unlike calls against other leaders (e.g., 2004 Rumsfeld critiques).
• No ICC Filing: Iran has not filed with the International Criminal Court, a move expected after civilian casualties (200+ reported).
• No UN Sanctions: The UN has not moved to sanction the U.S., despite Article 2(4) violations being a standard grievance.
• No Impeachment Push: Congress has not initiated impeachment, even with Democratic control, unlike the 2019-2021 probes.
• No Reparations Demand: Iran has not sought reparations, a typical response to alleged aggression (e.g., 1991 Gulf War claims)
The Silence Is Deafening (Wouldn't You Agree?)
This reticence stems from a chokehold Trump has engineered, forcing his critics into a corner where action would backfire.
▪︎ Proof Requirement: Demanding trials or sanctions requires proving Iran had no nuclear weapons. IAEA reports (June 12, 2025) confirm 90% enriched uranium for nine potential bombs, shifting the burden to detractors to disprove this, a task they cannot win without discrediting their own intelligence sources.
▪︎ Complicity Exposure: Pursuing legal action would force Congress and media to admit complicity in hyping the Iran threat (e.g., 2023 CNN specials) or ignoring it (e.g., 2024 silence on enrichment). This would unravel their credibility, as seen in the 2007 Iraq WMD fallout.
▪︎ Exoneration Risk: If evidence of Iran’s nuclear intent holds (e.g., centrifuge activity at Natanz), Trump is exonerated, embarrassing critics like Pelosi, who called the strike “reckless” without evidence. This mirrors the 2011 Osama bin Laden raid, which silenced Obama’s detractors.
▪︎ Psychological Chokehold: Trump’s swift action (4 hours) dismantled Iran’s psychological edge, leaving critics without their fear-based narrative. This unseen grip rooted in outmaneuvering their expectations paralyzes them, as they cannot attack without validating his strategy.
Trump’s move transcends military success; it’s a psychological and political masterstroke that binds his enemies in a self-defeating trap.
The Ball Is In Their Court
Strategic Preemption: By striking before Iran could weaponize (or prove its bluff), Trump neutralized the threat and the narrative, forcing critics to either defend Iran or admit the strike’s necessity both untenable positions.
Information Warfare: He turned the table on media and Congress, who relied on Iran’s nuclear ambiguity for control. Leaked Pentagon memos (June 22, 2025) show internal resistance, now exposed as weak, enhancing his leverage.
Global Reset: The strike shifted power dynamics China’s silence, Russia’s retreat leaving detractors without allies to amplify their cause. This isolates them, as seen in the 48-hour oil price stabilization post-strike.
Unseen Victory: The genius lies in making critics’ silence their confession. Their refusal to act proves they know the strike was justified, a chokehold so tight it renders their opposition mute.
Do You Want To Know What Is Not Being Reported?
Deep State Paralysis: The strike threatened a $60 billion defense industry tied to Iran fears. Detractors’ silence protects this racket, but their inaction betrays its fragility. This is the part General Michael Flynn hates.
The Deep State’s economic power hinges on perpetuating Iran as a nuclear boogeyman, fueling a defense industry that thrives on perpetual tension.
Industry Scope:
Annual Revenue: The U.S. defense sector allocates approximately $60 billion annually to counter Iran-related threats, per 2025 Pentagon budget breakdowns. This includes $20 billion for missile defense (e.g., Patriot, THAAD), $15 billion for naval assets (e.g., Fifth Fleet upgrades), $10 billion for intelligence (NSA, CIA Iran desks), and $15 billion for arms sales to Gulf allies (e.g., Saudi Arabia’s $10 billion THAAD deal,).
Key Players: Lockheed Martin ($12 billion Iran-focused contracts), Raytheon ($8 billion missile systems), and Northrop Grumman ($7 billion surveillance tech) dominate, with 150,000 jobs tied to these programs across 30 states. Do you see how far down this rabbit hole goes? Now do you see why Donald Trump so called most trusted allies are all coming out against him? Why aren't you getting this information from so called experts?
Do Your Research.