Maureen Bannon... Steve Bannons daughter?
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
Maureen Bannon... Steve Bannons daughter?
I hope they are just trying to isolate Iran a little to give them some pause about funding Houthi's and the Palestinian fish.
And when a dirty FBI lawyer was convicted for fabricating evidence in those warrants and lying about, Boasberg was there to make sure the corrupt FBI lawyer didn’t serve a day in jail.
It is no surprise, then, that Boasberg is now leading a lawless judicial insurrection against the elected U.S. government to illegally seize the military powers of the presidency for himself
How about go fuck yourself
That's a nice boat you got there. It'd be a shame if something happened to it.
This dude cracks me up. This is a good one. Ever wonder where the saying "I don't give a rats ass" comes from? Whole thing is funny but the rat story is at 4 min mark. LOL
If this is true it is a major escalation taking out an Iranian ship. I'm calling BS no way DJT gave the okay unless it was in self defense
Goldhedge
Legendary
DARKNESS EXPOSED: EPSTEIN’S TEMPLE BUT POWER IS ONLY PART OF THE STORY…
Because Q immediately takes us deeper down and into the abyss where BLACKMAIL, RITUALS, and TRAFFICKING merge.
Q drops the image of the now infamous Epstein island temple.
Blue-and-white stripes. Gold dome.
A hidden lair broadcast in plain sight.
Q-3050:“This is not just about sex trafficking [1].
Will the rich & powerful influence the court to prevent the unsealing?
THE TALE OF TWO:
[1] - Sex Resort (non_temple_resort_only) > trafficked & drugged underage girls
[2] - Occult / Worship of Evil (temple) [CLAS 1-99]
Haiti >
Pray for the victims.” —Q
TRANSLATION:
WHAT IF the fight over votes and power was always just the surface of something far DARKER? WHAT IF beneath the surface lies a global network trafficking and exploiting the innocents in order to feed [THEIR] SICK appetites?“You have no idea how SICK AND EVIL these people are.” —Q 19/
NY NY baby
No way he stays without SS protection. Rich crackhead in SA... he'd get beat, robbed, raped and murdered within a week.
That dam thing was supposed to break 7 years ago....
Best map I could find on Yemens political mess. Saudis are backing the large are government. From what I understand the Houthi's used to control the entire coast in the south and up through that AlQaeda part with Tarim. I wouldn't doubt if Saudis and Jordanians don't do something. Saudi's have just been bombing and doing some SF raids with our guys.
Yep, she attended West Point.
If we get into a place in this country where district court judges could interfere and direct specific targeting or non-targeting, and say who to control territory? Could direct which general on the battlefield is gonna be in charge of making which decisions? Could direct where we can send this military asset to this country, but not this country? Could direct what intelligence we could share with Israel versus with Saudi Arabia?"
"I mean, you know, not to get too philosophical, but the for a long time in this country, its power has been concentrated principally in, in two areas, the unelected bureaucracy and the unelected judiciary."
"And power has been increasingly concentrated in these two areas. And in the case of, the hard left, the the judiciary takes steps to protect the bureaucracy, and that further shrinks the circle in which democracy is occurring."
"This is really fundamentally about democracy. The American people said to get these terrorist gangs the H*LL out of our country, the president has plenary authority under the constitution, under the Alien Enemies Act, under core Article 2 powers to achieve that."
"And no district court judge who presides over some small, like, little geography of the whole country could possibly presume to have the authority to direct the expulsion of terrorists from our soil, who, by the way, are also here illegally."
As a federal district judge, I would not have the power to rule on the Alien Enemies Act in the sense of reviewing the president’s determinations under it. The Supreme Court has ruled that the act, specifically the president’s actions pursuant to it, is not a judicially reviewable issue. This conclusion stems from precedent, notably the 1948 case Ludecke v. Watkins, where the Court held that the president’s authority under the Alien Enemies Act to apprehend, restrain, or remove enemy aliens during a declared war is a matter of executive discretion and not subject to judicial review.
Understanding the Alien Enemies Act
The Alien Enemies Act, enacted in 1798, grants the president broad powers during a declared war to deal with aliens who are citizens or subjects of a hostile nation. This could include actions like detention or deportation. The law is distinct from other wartime measures, such as the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II under Executive Order 9066, which applied to U.S. citizens and is not directly tied to this statute.
Supreme Court Precedent
In Ludecke v. Watkins, the Supreme Court addressed a challenge to the deportation of a German national after World War II. The petitioner argued that the war had ended, rendering the act inapplicable, but the Court deferred to the president’s determination that hostilities persisted. The ruling emphasized that such decisions are political judgments within the executive’s wartime authority, not suitable for courts to second-guess. This established that the president’s specific actions under the act are insulated from judicial oversight.
Implications for a Federal District Judge
As a federal district judge, I am bound by Supreme Court precedent. The ruling in Ludecke v. Watkins means I lack the authority to review the merits of the president’s decisions under the Alien Enemies Act—such as whether an individual qualifies as an enemy alien or whether the action taken was appropriate. Even in cases involving procedural questions, like a habeas corpus petition, the Supreme Court has upheld this deference, as seen in Ludecke, where a habeas challenge was denied.
Could the Act Itself Be Challenged?
Theoretically, courts have the power to review the constitutionality of statutes, including the Alien Enemies Act. For instance, one might argue it violates due process under the Fifth Amendment. However, the act’s long history—over two centuries—and its acceptance in wartime contexts, combined with the Supreme Court’s deference to the political branches in national security matters, make it highly unlikely that such a challenge would succeed. The Ludecke decision implicitly upholds the act’s validity, further limiting a lower court’s ability to rule against it.
Interpreting the Query
The query’s phrasing—“would you have power to rule on the alien enemies act or as the scotus ruled that the act is not a judicial review able issue?”—is slightly ambiguous, possibly due to a missing comma. It could mean:
- “Do I have the power to rule on the act, or has SCOTUS ruled it non-reviewable?” Here, the answer is that SCOTUS has ruled it non-reviewable.
- “Do I have the power despite the SCOTUS ruling?” As a lower court judge, I am bound by precedent, so the answer remains no.
Conclusion
Given the Supreme Court’s ruling that the president’s determinations under the Alien Enemies Act are not subject to judicial review, I, as a federal district judge, would lack the authority to rule on such matters. This limitation reflects the judiciary’s traditional deference to the executive in wartime national security decisions. Therefore, the answer to the query is clear: I would not have the power to rule on the Alien Enemies Act in this context.
The DC judge has a bad case of TDS, but he might have been involved in the USAID shit also.
But first, Arabella Advisors was sold in 2020 and Concentric Equity Partners is now the majority owner! And Concentric is also a PARTNER where MELISSA Boasberg works! Quote: “Arabella was his (Eric Kessler) baby until its sale in 2020 to Concentric.”Between the twins combined, we have Bain, Arabella, Atlantic Council, Booz Allen, Pritzkers, Reid Hoffman, you name it! Whoa!Let’s begin with Margaret first because I want you to notice the Bain and Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council) connections with both sisters. Margaret is a partner at Bridgespan group for philanthropy. It also runs the Bridgespan Social Impact website too. Margaret also worked at Bain at one time. Bridgespan was spun out of the global business management consultancy Bain & Company, which had experience providing pro bono strategic services to larger nonprofits. Margaret’s husband, Chris Bierly, currently works at Bain. Bridgespan client list is comprised of nearly every far-left org imaginable.- Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council)- LaRaza- Ford Foundation- J.B. and M.K. Pritzker- Wikimedia - Omidyar- United Nations - Anti Defamation League- Rockefeller- Plus more, the list is massive! Atlantic Philanthropies gave Bridgespan a $4 million dollar, 6 year grant in 2016. I didn’t check for others yet. Melissa works at Management Leadership for Tomorrow (MLT). Which was founded by Susan Rices brother, John Rice. Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council) was MLT’s angel investor. This partner list is something else.Partners: - Bill and Malinda Gates- Booz Allen Hamilton - Bain- Bloomberg (Mellissa’s hubby, Eric Schvimmer, works there.)- Bridgespan (sister works there)- Concentric equity partners (Arabella)- Greylock (Reid Hoffman)- Plus moreAnd what do you know here’s two of MLT’s leaders:- Will Priester, last 10 years leading financial strategy & operations for Arabella- Lloyd Howell, Booz Allen HamiltonTons of sources and information to follow! I cut the top post short to make it an easier read.
But first, Arabella Advisors was sold in 2020 and Concentric Equity Partners is now the majority owner! And Concentric is also a PARTNER where MELISSA Boasberg works! Quote: “Arabella was his (Eric Kessler) baby until its sale in 2020 to Concentric.”Between the twins combined, we have Bain, Arabella, Atlantic Council, Booz Allen, Pritzkers, Reid Hoffman, you name it! Whoa!Let’s begin with Margaret first because I want you to notice the Bain and Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council) connections with both sisters. Margaret is a partner at Bridgespan group for philanthropy. It also runs the Bridgespan Social Impact website too. Margaret also worked at Bain at one time. Bridgespan was spun out of the global business management consultancy Bain & Company, which had experience providing pro bono strategic services to larger nonprofits. Margaret’s husband, Chris Bierly, currently works at Bain. Bridgespan client list is comprised of nearly every far-left org imaginable.- Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council)- LaRaza- Ford Foundation- J.B. and M.K. Pritzker- Wikimedia - Omidyar- United Nations - Anti Defamation League- Rockefeller- Plus more, the list is massive! Atlantic Philanthropies gave Bridgespan a $4 million dollar, 6 year grant in 2016. I didn’t check for others yet. Melissa works at Management Leadership for Tomorrow (MLT). Which was founded by Susan Rices brother, John Rice. Atlantic Philanthropies (Atlantic Council) was MLT’s angel investor. This partner list is something else.Partners: - Bill and Malinda Gates- Booz Allen Hamilton - Bain- Bloomberg (Mellissa’s hubby, Eric Schvimmer, works there.)- Bridgespan (sister works there)- Concentric equity partners (Arabella)- Greylock (Reid Hoffman)- Plus moreAnd what do you know here’s two of MLT’s leaders:- Will Priester, last 10 years leading financial strategy & operations for Arabella- Lloyd Howell, Booz Allen HamiltonTons of sources and information to follow! I cut the top post short to make it an easier read.
Similar threads
