Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
More on The Standard...drums of acid? Totally normal.


Why would Standard Hotel have 2 expensive 55 gallon drums of muriatic Acid ...And why would they illegally dispose a $1,000 worth of acid?

Closing for good?...



Let's put a fake investment group together and offer to buy it - we get to "inspect it" as part of our due diligence.
 
Mail is so fucked you couldn't get anything there in time.

We would need to call somebody local and make it happen old school.

Obviously I'm in for whatever. If we can find some way to send them pizzas even I'd be willing to try?!
Does anyone have a way to touch base w/ Rep Cawthorn? We could figure out how to arrange the funds and have him get them delivered....we could give a good old mom and pop pizza place some business thru these efforts.
 
I'm loving the Bernie memes. And not in a making fun of Bernie loving them way.

It was cold. He dressed for the weather with ZFG. (And mittens are much warmer than gloves).

I fundamentally disagree with Bernie politically. But I think I would like him as a beer buddy. Yeah...he sold out. Twice. I get it. How many of us wouldn't do the same going up against the Clinton/Obama/Jarret/Soros machine?

But I happen to like grumpy old people who want to argue and drink.

And don't care enough to try to put on airs for the public.
I lost all respect I had after he sold out a second time. Told everyone I knew that he was going to win the primaries, and thought it was a lock after Iowa. He earned a little back after putting Mitch and Nanzi in a body bag over stimulus.
 
Apologies to everyone, I'll be liking and responding as I try to get caught back up! Had a hell of a week at work and crashed by 7:30 every night this week while putting the boy to bed! Big mistake as I got over 150 pages behind but managed to put a small dent in that tonight. I have Fridays off so I'll up be catching up more while I do laundry and what not. Have my son's basketball game at 5:30 tomorrow and then my wife and I are headed down to Murrells Inlet for a kid-free weekend! She crashes early so my goal is to catch up by the end of the weekend!

Also, fuck Liberals!
 
Several pages behind, and don’t know if this has been discussed further. The Marines not saluting is a big deal. It is one of the USMC general orders that must be followed. Not saluting the CIC or any superior officer could result in severe disciplinary action. The Marines should salute when he approaches, and hold the salute until the he saluted, and then ends his salute. On bases, it is even required to salute the officers vehicles which are identified by the blue base entry sticker. That is a big deal.


Blue base stickers.....you’re showing your age now. DoD stopped using those 10+ years ago. Being a Soldier then an Airman, we were only required to salute staff cars....white tops designating a General Officer.
 
In reference to important links to videos, we should utilize the first page of this thread. The previous method worked great for quick access.

This thread, like it’s previous iterations, should continue with its time proven formula for sharing content. It is easier for the user requesting such videos.

Also:

Can this thread be accessed by all on crootn .com? If not, it should be.

I know there was an influx of trolls recently on the previous board. However, we now have our own moderators. 3 of them. Remember how good it was when just @fishinabarrel moderated LAC. And he was busy. We can tolerate a troll for a day or two. Shit, we should be experts at that.

Restricting access or ability to post and share from new users would be the kiss of death. Resulting in a parabolic curve of decreased contribution of interesting information.

If crootn is able to bring new users to the main forum, I want the newbies to be able to read and contribute ITT.

How about we use the original recipe? Open moderated thread that doesn’t need to be pinned.
 
Obviously it didn't happen on Inauguration Day but that thought has crossed my mind a lot. Still think it could be a possibility and would be the shot heard around the world.
He's definitely doing a bunch of stuff that they will say "angered Trump supporters." This is also why they've been pushing the "existential threat of white supremecists" so hard for the last year. They've been planning this for a LONG time.
 
Narrative. Apologies for being unclear.

Give them a narrative that is easy to understand. It can be anything this day in age (Dims do this all the time). The reports that come out of AZ, the PA numbers, the Mich machines. I think we already have MORE than we need TBH.

We don't need to reform the Dim places. If the red states do this at a local level we can lock the Dems out of the White House and House with much more certainty.

Edit: demand they remove the machines and gerrymander the lights out. They want to do this to remain in power longer and with a bigger majority. You need to give them the reassurance, narrative, and "cover" to move ahead.

Ahh I see what you are saying, and I agree with you on the "present easy to digest info so that anyone can understand what is going on"..I believe that at times the professional computer people, and math people for SIdney and CO got too far into the tech weeds and they lost folks with too much tech jargon, and not enough real world plain speak.

Here is something that I dont know if I can agree on. I dont think we have enough evidence at this point on the machines and I will tell you why:

1. The Ramsland report on MI as much as I hate to say it, was full of typos, and some inaccuracies just on the MI report. He also made other errors in things he reported. Now those could have just been minor things, but even Dems caught those things. And lets be honest, if we are talking about scrapping hundreds of millions of dollars of tax dollar machines...we need almost irrefutable proof, or at least pretty clear proof.
One thing I can say is that when Ramsland claimed that the "error rate of the machines counting" was supposed to be at x % and the machines were far above that...he made a wholly inaccurate statement there. You know when they were stating there was a 68% of the time error rate w the machines etc.. I looked that stuff up, and there is no such election rule that he quoted w regards to what the error rate is allowed on the machines. (at least I didnt see one). What he brought up was in relation to campaign contributions or something like that, but those numbers he quoted didnt have anything to do with a machine counting accuracy rate. So this has be concerned about the accuracy of their Findings because it calls into question their credibility. Also, when he testified regarding counties that had more votes received then people..he was using data from the wrong state..so his data was not accurate. He was quoting numbers from MN, that were supposed to be from MI, and they didnt have more votes than registered people.. Yes that matters when it comes to their credibility.

Now believe me, I am all for seeing these machines be culpable, but even I saw the cracks in Ramslands report (as much as I hate to say it cause you know which team I am on here)..and yes even I OVERLOOKED these things, because of the cause.. I/We cant overlook these things now because they matter when it comes to presenting 100% truthful proof as to what involvement the machines played or could have played in the monkey business election fraud.
Now other data that Ramsland presented, may very well be 100% true, and may indeed show that the machines are 100% culpable, and able to be and were manipulated I just dont think how he presented things, makes it 100% clear that this is true...and it is because of the inaccuracies of some of his findings..This would go against his credibility as an expert witness and would call into question the results of the tests. Reason I am bringing this up is cause Dems, and even pubs would as well if it means holding onto power as well as not scrapping 100s of millions of dollars of machines they already paid for. So this HAS to be done right, and has to be beyond reproach. The affidavidts and testimony HAS to be more accurate and full of less errors than the information and statements that Ramsland presented. Even I am questioning Ramslands investigations a little bit based on this info.

This is why I think if we get techs to do some testing on the DOM and ES&S machines, get someone who is a DEM and someone who is a Pub to run those tests. Make sure they are certified or qualified enough to do them, if both parties are represented, we now have transparency and neither side can claim the other is trying to push a particular political narrative based on their own set of politics.

2. Honestly, I hate to even think or say this, and as much as I think COL Montgomery seemed like a very credible witness. We really need to find out if what he claims he has as far as proof of seeing the data was seen going overseas...we need to actually 100% verify that he has this information and it is 100% true and accurate, and provable.
The reason for this is two fold:
If they had this information.and it is 100% provable..then

A. This would/should be enough evidence that we/or anyone do not need to potentially invest in any $$ to hire any techs to evaluate any machines, or they can be used to investigate maybe ES&S machines instead of Dominion ones cause we would already have the evidence that Dominion machines are compromised.

B. If he has that data he says he has... then an even bigger question: Why didn't DT and Co Powell, Lin, use this information to enact his 2018 EO regarding foreign interference and not give the presidency to Biden or allow him to take office? I mean this is a simple question and the straightest line between two points is it not? If we have our election data being shown going to foreign servers, being manipulated, then being sent back to us...is that not a smoking gun enough to prove election fraud, and interference, as well as have changed the results of the election....giving DT the win? Of COURSE it would. So WHY wasn't it done?
Is Col Montgomery FOS...and did he not really have that data that he says he did? That shows our votes going to foreign servers? I mean this is easily explainable and put into the simplest terms for people to understand...yet we still have Biden sworn in?

See what I mean, something is not making sense here. If Col Montgom has this data, it is the smoking gun, do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars, aka Biden never gets sworn in cause the whole election would have gotten scrapped as fraudulent and he Never should have gotten sworn in. With this data, we dont need to even bring up the signatures, the counting stacks of ballots more than once, or anything else for that matter, those are just the cherries on top and just further proof of election fraud that should also be looked into...

So either DT ignored this evidence, or his team didn't have this easily provable evidence or something. Cause this would have been the only evidence needed, as well as more models of the Edison data showing the vote switches on the machines. Those should have been the main focus of the evidence provided instead of getting all bogged down on those hearings with all of those peoples nickle and diming and the overloading of little stuff evidence that was provided. To me they bogged down the legs and the people watching with too much piddly evidence instead of just focusing on the major BOMBS....Col. Mont evidence showing votes going overseas, and the Edison voter data showing vote switches and negative votes, and votes being counted as fractions. Maybe a little of that other evidence could have been shown relevant, but they seemed to have too much piddly evidence that just mucked up things IMHO..

Anyway, sorry for being long winded.
 
Last edited:
Ahh I see what you are saying, and I agree with you on the "present easy to digest info so that anyone can understand what is going on"..I believe that at times the professional computer people, and math people for SIdney and CO got too far into the tech weeds and they lost folks with too much tech jargon, and not enough real world plain speak.

Here is something that I dont know if I can agree on. I dont think we have enough evidence at this point on the machines and I will tell you why:

1. The Ramsland report on MI as much as I hate to say it, was full of typos, and some inaccuracies just on the MI report. He also made other errors in things he reported. Now those could have just been minor things, but even Dems caught those things. And lets be honest, if we are talking about scrapping hundreds of millions of dollars of tax dollar machines...we need almost irrefutable proof, or at least pretty clear proof.
One thing I can say is that when Ramsland claimed that the "error rate of the machines counting" was supposed to be at x % and the machines were far above that...he made a wholly inaccurate statement there. You know when they were stating there was a 68% of the time error rate w the machines etc.. I looked that stuff up, and there is no such election rule that he quoted w regards to what the error rate is allowed on the machines. (at least I didnt see one). What he brought up was in relation to campaign contributions or something like that, but those numbers he quoted didnt have anything to do with a machine counting accuracy rate. So this has be concerned about the accuracy of their Findings because it calls into question their credibility. Also, when he testified regarding counties that had more votes received then people..he was using data from the wrong state..so his data was not accurate. He was quoting numbers from MN, that were supposed to be from MI, and they didnt have more votes than registered people.. Yes that matters when it comes to their credibility.

Now believe me, I am all for seeing these machines be culpable, but even I saw the cracks in Ramslands report (as much as I hate to say it cause you know which team I am on here)..and yes even I OVERLOOKED these things, because of the cause.. I/We cant overlook these things now because they matter when it comes to presenting 100% truthful proof as to what involvement the machines played or could have played in the monkey business election fraud.
Now other data that Ramsland presented, may very well be 100% true, and may indeed show that the machines are 100% culpable, and able to be and were manipulated I just dont think how he presented things, makes it 100% clear that this is true...and it is because of the inaccuracies of some of his findings..This would go against his credibility as an expert witness and would call into question the results of the tests. Reason I am bringing this up is cause Dems, and even pubs would as well if it means holding onto power as well as not scrapping 100s of millions of dollars of machines they already paid for. So this HAS to be done right, and has to be beyond reproach. The affidavidts and testimony HAS to be more accurate and full of less errors than the information and statements that Ramsland presented. Even I am questioning Ramslands investigations a little bit based on this info.

This is why I think if we get techs to do some testing on the DOM and ES&S machines, get someone who is a DEM and someone who is a Pub to run those tests. Make sure they are certified or qualified enough to do them, if both parties are represented, we now have transparency and neither side can claim the other is trying to push a particular political narrative based on their own set of politics.

2. Honestly, I hate to even think or say this, and as much as I think COL Montgomery seemed like a very credible witness. We really need to find out if what he claims he has as far as proof of seeing the data was seen going overseas...we need to actually 100% verify that he has this information and it is 100% true and accurate, and provable.
The reason for this is two fold:
If they had this information.and it is 100% provable..then

A. This would/should be enough evidence that we/or anyone do not need to potentially invest in any $$ to hire any techs to evaluate any machines, or they can be used to investigate maybe ES&S machines instead of Dominion ones cause we would already have the evidence that Dominion machines are compromised.

B. If he has that data he says he has... then an even bigger question: Why didn't DT and Co Powell, Lin, use this information to enact his 2018 EO regarding foreign interference and not give the presidency to Biden or allow him to take office? I mean this is a simple question and the straightest line between two points is it not? If we have our election data being shown going to foreign servers, being manipulated, then being sent back to us...is that not a smoking gun enough to prove election fraud, and interference, as well as have changed the results of the election....giving DT the win? Of COURSE it would. So WHY wasn't it done?
Is Col Montgomery FOS...and did he not really have that data that he says he did? That shows our votes going to foreign servers? I mean this is easily explainable and put into the simplest terms for people to understand...yet we still have Biden sworn in?

See what I mean, something is not making sense here. If Col Montgom has this data, it is the smoking gun, do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars, aka Biden never gets sworn in cause the whole election would have gotten scrapped as fraudulent and he Never should have gotten sworn in. With this data, we dont need to even bring up the signatures, the counting stacks of ballots more than once, or anything else for that matter, those are just the cherries on top and just further proof of election fraud that should also be looked into...

So either DT ignored this evidence, or his team didn't have this easily provable evidence or something. Cause this would have been the only evidence needed, as well as more models of the Edison data showing the vote switches on the machines. Those should have been the main focus of the evidence provided instead of getting all bogged down on those hearings with all of those peoples nickle and diming and the overloading of little stuff evidence that was provided. To me they bogged down the legs and the people watching with too much piddly evidence instead of just focusing on the major BOMBS....Col. Mont evidence showing votes going overseas, and the Edison voter data showing vote switches and negative votes, and votes being counted as fractions. Maybe a little of that other evidence could have been shown relevant, but they seemed to have too much piddly evidence that just mucked up things IMHO..

Anyway, sorry for being long winded.
One simple easy to understand question about these machines is, do they subtract as well as add? If they can subtract as has been reported then why? The only mission is to add votes and then report a total at the end of the day. And not the NEXT day.
 
One simple easy to understand question about these machines is, do they subtract as well as add? If they can subtract as has been reported then why? The only mission is to add votes and then report a total at the end of the day. And not the NEXT day.

Well you also have to ask the question of "Why" do they also reflect votes as fractional instead of whole numbers...
Why Would ANY voting machine of ANY kind EVER count votes, or even have the ability to count votes as fractional instead of whole numbers?
The Edison data that was scraped shows pretty clearly that votes for candidates were shown as fractional instead of whole numbers..
Dominion has a "feature" called weighted voting...which allows someone to (LOL) weight votes differently...Like I get 1.25 votes for every vote given to me...and you get .75 votes for every vote YOU get..

LOL

I mean it is so ridiculous, but...
 
Well you also have to ask the question of "Why" do they also reflect votes as fractional instead of whole numbers...
Why Would ANY voting machine of ANY kind EVER count votes, or even have the ability to count votes as fractional instead of whole numbers?
The Edison data that was scraped shows pretty clearly that votes for candidates were shown as fractional instead of whole numbers..
Dominion has a "feature" called weighted voting...which allows someone to (LOL) weight votes differently...Like I get 1.25 votes for every vote given to me...and you get .75 votes for every vote YOU get..

LOL

I mean it is so ridiculous, but...
Another question is, are the machines connected to the internet? If so, why?
 
Brother how can you forget what they did to a LAC brother?

@MortgageHorn got a perma-ban on Twitter, Orangebloods, & an extension for no reason on my Facebook 30 day ban.
I'll never forget what they did to you, brother...however, OP was asking for moderate conservatives getting bant from Twitter. MH, there are many fine adjectives that would apply to you but "moderate" ain't one of 'em!
 
I don’t care if the Guard debacle is on Joe or not. Pin it on him. Make up shit if you have to. Contrive scams. Every single day make him answer to phony accusations and absurdly contrived scandals. Don’t give him and his cronies a moment’s rest. Drag him through the mud. His family, too. Destroy them all. All day, every day. Threaten. Investigate. Impeach. Repeat. It’s a new world, and they created it. You can play their game or get crushed by it. Play snd play hard. Relentlessly.
 
I don’t care if the Guard debacle is on Joe or not. Pin it on him. Make up shit if you have to. Contrive scams. Every single day make him answer to phony accusations and absurdly contrived scandals. Don’t give him and his cronies a moment’s rest. Drag him through the mud. His family, too. Destroy them all. All day, every day. Threaten. Investigate. Impeach. Repeat. It’s a new world, and they created it. You can play their game or get crushed by it. Play snd play hard. Relentlessly.
Lol, he doesn’t answer questions.
 

Donate 2025

Total amount
$400.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom