• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
1. Raised children in black ops for insertion into government, media and industry. The Finders were contractors with entire manuals on raising and programming kids. All that material disappeared.


Sounds like Home in the Amazon series Utopia. "Stay Alive Jessica Hyde." May have to binge this again.

I wish they wouldn’t have cancelled it.

All because of the parallels to what’s going on today.
 
IFL The Finders
Here you go.



 
Communism much Penn St? Remove any and all tax payer based funding that these universities receive, and watch how quickly they and the communists within our education system dwindle.

The people who support these types of things are also the worst. They are far too ignorant or just plain stupid to see what they are buying into and don't smarten up until the damage is already done.
 
This trial made me pull together some thoughts.

Someone recently posed this question to me: "Do you really think the world is run by satanic pedophiles?"
My response was: it always has been, why would it be any different now? Who do you think the Sodomites, Egyptians, Midianites, Canaanites, Philistines, Babylonians, Romans, Mayans, Aztecs, all had in common?

This took that person by surprise. They were familiar with ancient civilizations and practices, but never had connected the dots. It's mentioned quite openly throughout the Bible and other historical texts.


This isn't really new or even controversial, but the scale and consistency is still horrifying at the core.

So this turned into a discussion of "why?"

My response was along the lines of, Satan is very clever and very deceptive, but he's not all that creative. For instance, when Hitler first took power, he set fire to the Germany Capitol and blamed it on the opposition party in order to consolidate power. Sound familiar?


Applying this concept, if you remove all of the context, which is highly important, what did God do for his ultimate act of love? He sacrificed his son. This was predestined with the story of Abraham and Isaac, and Satan took what is meant to be an illustration of the ultimate sacrifice that most people could relate with, giving up your child for the good of others, and twisted it into the despicable and sinful act of child sacrifice.

Satan's twisted reasoning: if you want to be God, which he and all of his followers ultimately do, then you have to sacrifice your kids.

This isn't new. It's not original. It's extremely distorted. It's also gone on from the beginning of man.
 
This Supreme Court case may just end up with something big. I think they may very well overturn Roe. At the very least I think they will go the viability route and kick it back to the states. Either way, the abortion fight is changing today. Pray boys and girls.


Edit: yeah I know I’m a sweet kid and that in the end Kav and or ACB will screw us.
 
I presume this will be utilized to show vaccines wane and everyone needs a booster
Funny all the other vaccinations I have taken in my life have done the job without a booster except for tetanus and that's a bacterium and we're talking viruses.

No smallpox. No polio. No whopping cough. No measles, mumps or chickenpox and I don't take flu shots except every 40 years or so.

This is a giant ruse to have the government continue to pay fortunes to Big Pharma because many would not take the Jab if they had to pay for it. It's a grand kick-back scheme from Big Pharma to the politicians and bureaucrats like Fauci. Remember, Pfizer recently hired 20+ lobbyists to push for endless Jabs and mandates. At least there is some sliver of sanity coming from the courts and a lot of awakening.
 
:rolleyes:

FFeqeSMVEAMhZhT
 
I found this while cleaning out my files. I got it in July likely from here.

CovidVaccine/Pfizer
Lot # EH9948


SARS-COV Vaccine/Moderna
Lot:EH12007 EXP 12-12-21

The advantage of actually getting the virus is you are exposed to all the antigenic parts of the virus, not just the spike protein which is what the mRNA codes for. I’m thinking there will be selection pressure on the virus to alter the spike protein and now comes the variant rendering the vaccine less effective. If you have natural immunity there isn’t the same selection pressure because multiple mutations would have to happen.

A great letter to an employer about the jab to protect your rights.

Dear Boss,

Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law.

First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the "option to accept or refuse administration" of the Covid-19 vaccine. ( ... ) This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).

Secondly, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).)

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. ( https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine). The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.(https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html )

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/



Prophylaxis dosage for Covid19 in for high risk individuals 0.2 mg/kg* — one dose on day 1 and day 3, then take one dose weekly for 10 weeks, followed by one dose every 2 weeks**

This is info I found on their website:
Post COVID-19 exposure prophylaxis*** 0.2 mg/kg* — one dose on day 1 and day 3 Vitamin D3 1,000–3,000 IU/day Vitamin C 1,000mg twice a day Quercetin 250mg/day Zinc 50mg/day Melatonin 6mg before bedtime (causes drowsiness)

EARLY OUTPATIENT PROTOCOL**** lvermectin 0.2 mg/kg* — one dose on day 1 and day 3 Vitamin D3 4,000 IU/day Vitamin C 2,000 mg 2–3 times daily Quercetin 250mg twice a day Zinc 100mg/day Melatonin 10mg before bedtime (causes drowsiness) Aspirin 325mg/day (unless contraindicated
 
Is this real?

Appears false. Ruling below

The defendants have raised certain alternative arguments that need not be addressed. Their ripeness argument is jurisdictional, but in denying preliminary injunctive relief, I have not determined that the court does have jurisdiction. It is plaintiffs’ burden to show the court has jurisdiction, and the nature of their burden depends on the stage of the proceedings. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). Because we are still at the pleading stage, and because the complaint itself does not show any lack of ripeness, I have proceeded to consider the motion. Cf. id. Of course, if the plaintiffs could not establish a likelihood that their claims are ripe, they could not show a likelihood of success on the merits. Cf. Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (“[A] party who seeks a preliminary injunction must show a substantial likelihood of standing.”). But if they did not, that would only be a basis for denying preliminary injunctive relief—not dismissing the case at this stage. And because I am denying preliminary injunctive relief on other grounds, I have not further addressed ripeness of success on the merits, I need not evaluate the other preliminary injunction factors. The motions (ECF Nos. 3, 10) are DENIED.

An initial scheduling order and an order addressing the plaintiffs request to proceed anonymously (ECF No. 4) will issue separately.

SO ORDERED on November 12, 2021.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
 
As per resignations being indicative of a sweeping, world saving plan

What happened to these ceos after they resigned due to hypothetical revelations, deal making?

Are their successors pure and noble?

Or is this all a play action fake?

Communists dump their own, they line up their own at the wall

Are we sure this isn't them purging their own and installing a new wave of minions?
 
Appears false. Ruling below

The defendants have raised certain alternative arguments that need not be addressed. Their ripeness argument is jurisdictional, but in denying preliminary injunctive relief, I have not determined that the court does have jurisdiction. It is plaintiffs’ burden to show the court has jurisdiction, and the nature of their burden depends on the stage of the proceedings. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). Because we are still at the pleading stage, and because the complaint itself does not show any lack of ripeness, I have proceeded to consider the motion. Cf. id. Of course, if the plaintiffs could not establish a likelihood that their claims are ripe, they could not show a likelihood of success on the merits. Cf. Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (“[A] party who seeks a preliminary injunction must show a substantial likelihood of standing.”). But if they did not, that would only be a basis for denying preliminary injunctive relief—not dismissing the case at this stage. And because I am denying preliminary injunctive relief on other grounds, I have not further addressed ripeness of success on the merits, I need not evaluate the other preliminary injunction factors. The motions (ECF Nos. 3, 10) are DENIED.

An initial scheduling order and an order addressing the plaintiffs request to proceed anonymously (ECF No. 4) will issue separately.

SO ORDERED on November 12, 2021.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
👀👀
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom