Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
A bill from Australia:


Summary​

Amends: the Surveillance Devices Act 2004 and Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 to: introduce data disruption warrants to enable the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) to disrupt data by modifying, adding, copying or deleting data in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online; and make minor technical corrections; the Surveillance Devices Act 2004 to introduce network activity warrants to enable the AFP and ACIC to collect intelligence on serious criminal activity by permitting access to the devices and networks used to facilitate criminal activity; the Crimes Act 1914 to: introduce account takeover warrants to enable the AFP and ACIC to take over a person's online account for the purposes of gathering evidence to further a criminal investigation; and make minor amendments to the controlled operations regime to ensure controlled operations can be conducted effectively in the online environment; and 10 Acts to make consequential amendments.
 
Hello All - I could use a bit of help from my research team here once again.

A few days ago I heard Robert Malone say on the war room that the FDA did not send the Pfizer vaccine approval to an advisory board, as is normally protocol for approval, and that they didn’t allow for public comment, which is also protocol. Is this documented anywhere?

Further, I just had a friend tell me that 96% of doctors are vaccinated. Is that accurate? I had heard that that number was much lower. Does anyone have evidence that it is lower?

I appreciate any help I can get in advance! Thank you!
 
A bill from Australia:


Summary​

Amends: the Surveillance Devices Act 2004 and Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 to: introduce data disruption warrants to enable the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) to disrupt data by modifying, adding, copying or deleting data in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online; and make minor technical corrections; the Surveillance Devices Act 2004 to introduce network activity warrants to enable the AFP and ACIC to collect intelligence on serious criminal activity by permitting access to the devices and networks used to facilitate criminal activity; the Crimes Act 1914 to: introduce account takeover warrants to enable the AFP and ACIC to take over a person's online account for the purposes of gathering evidence to further a criminal investigation; and make minor amendments to the controlled operations regime to ensure controlled operations can be conducted effectively in the online environment; and 10 Acts to make consequential amendments.

So, basically the equivalent of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
 
Last edited:
The Taliban are notoriously terrible partners. I can't imagine them being armed to the teeth would make that better. They were going to take Afghanistan before they took all our leftovers.
The Chinese aren't going to take the country. They don't want it. They just want their resources and their opium.

Afghanistan, along with its neighbors, is a violent cesspool. The taliban cannot hold any part of their fractured country if they're not heavily armed, and no doubt China picked through anything they might want to reverse engineer. If China is going to set up mining operations, they need someone in country to actually deal with, they're not going to send in a massive army and occupy and deal with terrorists when they can just have us arm the taliban for them and pay them to protect their operations.
 
Hello All - I could use a bit of help from my research team here once again.

A few days ago I heard Robert Malone say on the war room that the FDA did not send the Pfizer vaccine approval to an advisory board, as is normally protocol for approval, and that they didn’t allow for public comment, which is also protocol. Is this documented anywhere?

Further, I just had a friend tell me that 96% of doctors are vaccinated. Is that accurate? I had heard that that number was much lower. Does anyone have evidence that it is lower?

I appreciate any help I can get in advance! Thank you!


There is a ton of conflicting info. It is in the details. Retreat on this one. Not a hill worth dying on. Pfizer runs the fda. For them to approve it is really just rubber stamp and to degrade our military preparedness down the road
 
So, basically the equivalent of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
I interpreted as worse. That they can go in and actually manipulate your information, i.e. make your digital history whatever they want.

...modifying, adding, copying or deleting data in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online; and make minor technical corrections
 
Anyone in here from beginning ever thought it would take this long? I sure as hell didn't. Pretty amazing what has transpired. My faith is stronger than ever that the People get our country back

I've Been Thinking About Exactly What You Just Said a Lot Over The Last Week

I'll Be Publishing ITT a @MortgageHorn Diatribe on It Shortly

Using Capitalization of Course ;)
 
I interpreted as worse. That they can go in and actually manipulate your information, i.e. make your digital history whatever they want.

...modifying, adding, copying or deleting data in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online; and make minor technical corrections

454R-GL__89094.1351527582.jpg

how-to-raise-sheep.jpg
 

Donate 2025

Total amount
$400.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom