I read a very interesting article titled "Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Screams for Department of Justice Criminal Investigation," published on April 8, 2025, on American Thinker (linked below).
The article, authored by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., argues that the results of the Wisconsin Supreme Court election held on April 1, 2025, suggest potential election fraud warranting a criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The article begins by outlining the key details of the election. On April 1, 2025, Susan Crawford, described as a "hard-left" candidate opposed to voter ID requirements, defeated conservative Brad Schimel with 55% of the vote to Schimel’s 45%, a margin of 237,884 votes out of 2,364,372 total votes cast. This election determined a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Notably, in the same election, 63% of voters supported a state constitutional amendment requiring voter ID, which passed in every county except Madison. The article highlights this apparent contradiction—Crawford’s victory despite widespread support for voter ID—as a red flag suggesting irregularities
The core of the article’s argument rests on research by Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., published on http://GodsFiveStones.com. Paquette analyzed the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s (WEC) August 2024 voter roll database, which contained 7,744,986 registered voters. Using a SQL database search for "same name, same phone number" entries, he identified 874,455 "suspicious slightly modified duplicate records." The article interprets this as evidence of potential voter fraud, asserting that these duplicates could represent "non-existent voters" with legitimate state voter IDs, created through algorithmic manipulation.
The article claims that such duplicates violate the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002, which prohibits a single voter from having multiple state voter ID numbers. It alleges that 11.3% of Wisconsin’s registered voters (approximately 874,455 out of 7.7 million) have illegal multiple IDs, a scale it describes as "grand." The authors suggest that these records are hidden within the WEC database and exploited by "criminals" using "algorithm record locators" to request mail-in ballots, enabling large-scale fraud.
They argue that the affected voters are likely unaware of this manipulation, pointing the finger at those managing the WEC’s systems.
The article draws a parallel to the 2024 U.S. Senate election in Wisconsin, where Republican Eric Hovde lost to Democrat Tammy Baldwin. It references a late-night "ballot dump" of 108,000 absentee ballots in Milwaukee at 4:00 a.m. on November 6, 2024, with nearly 90% favoring Baldwin. Hovde, who had been leading earlier, contested the result, calling it statistically improbable given same-day voting patterns in Milwaukee, where he received 22% of the vote.
The article suggests this event mirrors the Supreme Court election, reinforcing suspicions of systemic fraud enabled by the same alleged voter roll manipulation.
The authors argue that the scale of duplicate voter records—11.3% of the total—could have provided enough fraudulent votes to tip the Supreme Court election in Crawford’s favor, given her 237,884-vote margin.
They note that Wisconsin’s population in 2024 was 5.961 million, implying that the 7.7 million registered voters exceed the state’s voting-age population, further fueling their suspicions (though they do not account for factors like inactive registrations). This is something that needs to be investigated by the DOJ in my opinion..
