Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Support our Community

    We're proud to offer an ad-free experience and valuable content thanks to the support of our TFSF members. If you enjoy what we do and want to help us continue providing the best experience, consider joining our Patreon

    For $15 a month, you can help us cover costs, support growth, and ensure we keep having fun!

    Your support makes a difference. Thank you!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

GatorOK

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
1,470
Pretty shocking she would even suggest this publicly at this point, just given the yuge can of worms she likely opened with a large percentage of their supporters. Also unless she just went rogue, RFK has to be okay with her saying that. If so, has the decision already been made?
RFK hates Clinton and this could be a way to get at Clinton after her endorsement last night.
 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,496

View attachment 221326


View attachment 221327

Soros et al know it will be hard to steal the presidency from Trump given his poll numbers and massive rallies. They are putting their money in Congressional races to control the Congress, not approve Trump's nominees, not certify the election and otherwise create obstacles to prevent Trump from doing the stuff he said he would. It's also easier to steal House and Senate races. This is in case Trump is not in jail.
 

s-ou-thern

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
3,874
thoughts? Think they are being sensitive. Got this from an attorney around here.


Group tells members it’s OK to criticize, but don’t dare call Trump conviction 'partisan'​



Recently, the Connecticut Bar Association (CBA) members about a message posted by President Maggie Castinado, President-Elect James T. (Tim) Shearin, and Vice President Emily A. Gianquinto warning them about criticizing the prosecutions of former President Donald Trump. The message from the bar leadership is chilling for those lawyers who view cases like the one in Manhattan as a raw political prosecution. While the letter does not outright state that such criticism will be considered unethical conduct, it states that the criticism has "no place in the public discourse" and calls on members to speak publicly in support of the integrity of these legal proceedings.

The statement begins by warning members that "words matter" but then leaves the ramifications for bar members dangling on how it might matter to them. They simply note that some comments will be viewed as "crossing the line from criticism to dangerous rhetoric."

According to the CBA, it is now considered reckless and unprofessional to make analogies to show trials or to question the integrity of the legal system or the judges in such cases.

The CBA is warning lawyers that such comments can cross the line. The letter assures members that they are free to criticize, but warns that attacking the ethics of a judge or the motivations behind these cases is dangerous and could spark violence.

The concern is not with the plea for lawyers to take care that their comments do not encourage such "aggressive tactics." The problem is the suggestion that lawyers are acting somehow unprofessionally in denouncing what many view as a two-tier system of justice and the politicization of our legal system.



For those lawyers who view such prosecutions as political, they are speaking out in defense of what they believe is the essence of blind justice in America. What is "reckless" to the CBA, is righteous to others. Notably, CBA officials did not write to denounce attacks on figures like Bill Barr, or claims that the Justice Department was rigging justice during the Trump years.
Ironically, the letter only reinforced the view of a legal system that is maintaining a political orthodoxy and agenda. These officials declare that it is now unprofessional or reckless for lawyers to draw historical comparisons to show trials or to question the motives or ethics underlying these cases. They warn lawyers not to "sow distrust in the public for the courts where it does not belong." Yet, many believe that there is an alarming threat to our legal system and that distrust is warranted in light of prosecutions like the one in Manhattan.

The point is that the bar association also has a duty to protect the core rights that define our legal system, particularly the right of free speech. Our legal system has nothing to fear from criticism. Indeed, free speech strengthens our system by exposing divisions and encouraging dialogue. It is orthodoxy and speech intolerance that represent the most serious threats to that system.

You voice has power and when used should be used for good. However, the term good is subjective. It is not the role of an individual or a group to try to silence them by defining for them what they believe to be "right or good." You may not like what someone else has to say, but you will dislike it even more when you are silenced, when you desire to have a say.
It’s CT. It’s where Libs go to escape the shit show run by Libs in NY.
 

tiderollsonu

A man from Nantucket
Founder
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
6,244
Tucker Carlson set up a meeting in Milwaukee with Trump and RFK durning the convention. Also Nicole Shanahan is Elon Musk's side piece. David Sacks and Tucker Carlson have known each other since college and it was reported that those 3 picked JD Vance for VP, instead of who Rupert Murdoch and Ken Griffin wanted for VP.

I wonder if Trump promised RFK HHS cabinet or to chair some Presidential commission on vaccines, medical censorship, toxins on food, or whatever. Nicole wants something and I wonder if Elon and company promised to back her for California governorship? Having all the wealthy VCs in silicon valley backing you could just outspend everyone else.


This is from a few months ago
 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,496
I've seen exactly zero media coverage of this. Seems important, no?


Yet, they let millions of illegals into the US without a Death Jab or even a medical check. Now we are seeing more cases of measles, TB, dengue fever, polio, and other diseases not commonly seen in the US all due to their ignoring the border. Of course, she will be exempt from the jab.
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
21,125

 

AmericanViking

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
8,792
tough-crowd-comedian.gif

None is deserved
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom