Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

[Sgfeer]

Who are the racist's again?

 

[imprimis]

We'll see if it's true if the Iranian flag is flying half mast in DC on Monday.

Over the WH?

 

[22*43*51]

 

[orng_blud]

 

[imprimis]

Does Twitter Think Today Is April Fool's Day?



Really, you think I'd follow any one of these gaggle of faggots????



View attachment 216728

OBiden between the two makes it an Oreo.

 

[s-ou-thern]

“Why were we able to livestream the moon landing in 1969 but not in 2024?”

Callers asks NASA obvious question.

NASA answers are truly laughable:-

“Uh we had issues with file transfers”

“We had a number of communication glitches”

“It’s very difficult to transmit on ‘the fly’ if you will”

Think - all the advancements in technology over 55 years & they couldnt do it

Why do you think they didn’t stream the Artemis landing in 2024?i

I guess the technology died about the time Stanley Kubrick did…

 

[22*43*51]

 

[orng_blud]

 

[orng_blud]

 

[imprimis]

View attachment 216729

View attachment 216730

View attachment 216731


Who are the racist's again?

Yep. Hildebitch showed her love for Sanger in Haiti.

 

[22*43*51]

 

[orng_blud]

 

[madman71]

Boom.

After a year of heartache it’s fixed. Thanks for looking into it @madman71

Glad to help.

 

[22*43*51]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[BamaRidger]

Muslims conquered Europe

All those Crusades just delayed the inevitable

It is about conquest -- through force is necessary -- and conversion. Anyone who does not convert is an infidel and the Koran says infidel's must be eliminated. Islam teaches that once a land is inhabited by Muslims, it shall remain Muslim for all time. The Ottoman Empire once pushed as far north as present-day Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania, Kosovo, Serbia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia, and Hungary. Moors occupied most of Spain and Portugal as well parts of southern Italy and France.Muslim populations in North Africa claim an entitlement to those lands.

 

[22*43*51]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[VegasThreadLurkerLAC]

https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-eternal-dangers-of-rna-vaccines/​

Finale​

"Widespread and sustained injury to tissues and to blood vessels must be expected to occur through attack of the immune system on spike protein-producing cells. This attack occurs because the spike protein is non-self; and since every other mRNA vaccine will encode non-self, we must expect that it will cause harm by the same mechanism and to a similar extent. These nightmarish scenarios will worsen with every booster injection.

To top everything, contamination of vaccine batches with functional plasmid-DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception, because no cost-effective procedure exists to reliably separate mass-produced RNA from the plasmids. The introduction of a foreign chromosome equates with alteration of the genome. Long-lasting auto-immune attack on the cells is inevitable.

Integration of plasmid-DNA into the human chromosome must moreover be expected to occasionally occur. Myriad cellular functions can then be permanently disrupted. Malignancies may arise and life expectancy may drop. A horror scenario arises that could affect countless people whom we love and hold in our hearts. We must prevent this.

The medical world must rise on the spot and bring the use of RNA-injections to a full stop."

 

[madman71]

 

[Viking]

View attachment 216740

When will people stop supporting the kNeeling Football League? Bread and circus! Skol!

 

[BamaRidger]

inherently unreliable and no reasonable juror could believe any component of his testimony to be true beyond a reasonable doubt.This is not a new concept to trial lawyers. This kind of issue is presented in every case at the conclusion of the evidence when the attorneys -- particularly defense attorneys in criminal cases -- ask for "directed verdicts" or a "judgment of acquittal."You almost always lose that motion, but this case is different. The Govt has brought a case that RELIES on the truthfulness of the testimony of a particular witness who has made himself so entirely unreliable with his past conduct -- which he admits freely -- that it is impossible to separate fact from fiction in his recounting of events.It does not matter how much "corroboration" there is on OTHER parts -- if any part of his testimony is "I talked with Trump and we discussed XYZ", there is no corroboration for that. All the jury has is his version of that conversation and what Trump said or heard. His total lack of credibility makes that testimony unreliable in a criminal case where that element must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt."

 

[madman71]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[imprimis]

inherently unreliable and no reasonable juror could believe any component of his testimony to be true beyond a reasonable doubt.This is not a new concept to trial lawyers. This kind of issue is presented in every case at the conclusion of the evidence when the attorneys -- particularly defense attorneys in criminal cases -- ask for "directed verdicts" or a "judgment of acquittal."You almost always lose that motion, but this case is different. The Govt has brought a case that RELIES on the truthfulness of the testimony of a particular witness who has made himself so entirely unreliable with his past conduct -- which he admits freely -- that it is impossible to separate fact from fiction in his recounting of events.It does not matter how much "corroboration" there is on OTHER parts -- if any part of his testimony is "I talked with Trump and we discussed XYZ", there is no corroboration for that. All the jury has is his version of that conversation and what Trump said or heard. His total lack of credibility makes that testimony unreliable in a criminal case where that element must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt."

The judge may take the case away from the jury. But, only if they return a not-guilty verdict. Then he will rule from the bench. Since he and his daughter have been compromised, don't expect him to rule for DJT.

 

[Jayhacker]

View attachment 216732

Now do what if we quit funding wars, NATO and the WHO all over this pathetic planet.

 

[imprimis]

Hamill only loves those that put money in his pockets. Those are the demented sociopaths, murderers and pedophiles.

 

[Goldhedge]

I guess the technology died about the time Stanley Kubrick did…

View attachment 216740

None from Kansas City, nor football fans I'll bet...

 

[BamaRidger]

 

[BamaRidger]

But I'm confident you would have been comfortable building a case around someone like Cohen.

I'll remember that when your resume crosses my desk in the future. I'll use it to start the fire in my wood-burning stove.

 

[22*43*51]

 

[22*43*51]

 

[BamaRidger]

But sometimes the Judge can't make that decision until after the witness has been heard from.

Some judges will hear the witness's testimony outside the presence of the jury first -- or at least parts of it -- before making that decision.

Usually it comes afterwards.

The problem with Cohen are his answers that make him wholly unreliable -- which are now in the record and under oath. That wasn't the case before Cohen took the stand.

Now the evidence in the case is the basis for a finding BY THE JUDGE that Cohen is not credible.

That is not a factual determination that Cohen's testimony is "true" or "false" so it does not supplant the jury's rule.

It is a finding that Cohen is an unreliable witness and no juror could REASONABLY find Cohen's testimony to be "true beyond a reasonable doubt" on any subject because Cohen's admissions about lying under oath when in his interest to do so.

It is a finding after the fact of "Cohen should not have been allowed to testify".

If Cohen's testimony is the only evidence on the question of Trump's knowledge, then without Cohen's testimony there is no evidence of Trump's knowledge and as a matter of law he must be acquitted.

I've only done this for 35 years.

 

[BamaRidger]

 

[BamaRidger]

 

[BamaRidger]

 

[Catilac]

Maybe the NFL will distance itself from his remarks

 

[BamaRidger]