Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

22*43*51

Boob Enthusiast
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
20,275
This right here.



You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes.

I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others.

I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to.

Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib.

Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class.

Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people.

I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation.

I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
2,771


BALTIMORE UPDATE: Analysis from specialists in predictive behavioral analytics, counter-terrorism, hazardous materials, maritime attacks, cyber, national security & intel - this is their view:

Based on their training & experience, they believe this was two types of operation:

1) “Penetration testing” where they are probing/testing to identify vulnerabilities in our responses and defences,

AND

2) a shaping operation to set the conditions and prepare the battlefield for a potential future event.

The concern is that other critical infrastructure disruptions/hits recently that appeared to be independent, isolated events, MAY not be. For example, the Ohio chemical disaster, train derailments, fires at food processing plants etc when taken in isolation do not appear to be that significant but when taken together, could indicate shaping or stacking operations that are paving the way for a bigger event where they do any number of these types of operations together. That could potentially paralyze the U.S..

So the critical question our government should be answering right now is this:

“When will they trigger a multiple episode that causes the paralysis effect?”

Some of the indicators are how many incidents have occurred within “a relatively short timeline” & what they see as the departure from what is “normal”.

They believe those in charge will make sure the investigation into the bridge crash “goes nowhere quick”.

And one of the goals here is to give the public mental anesthesia while they test this, using train derailments or exposure to chemicals in Ohio where they told everyone to shelter indoors - to ask questions like: Did they comply? Is this going to successfully deceive & cause behavioural change?

They use the media to create the assumptive narrative - do not want the facts analyzed because they do not want people processing the truth. Truth naturally leads to questions they do not want asked.

But it would be “foolish and naive at the expense of national security not to question the Government narrative on the Baltimore bridge crash given the level of corruption in spheres of power and influence in this country today”.

With many years of experience in “spoofing” - the tactic used in cyber warfare to hack into someones’s system and deceive in order to achieve a certain outcome - they recognized multiple indicators watching the video that tell them the GPS signal was likely hacked. It would have led them to believe they were not as close to the bridge as they were and may be why in the video you see the crazy lean to port and then to hard starboard as they realized they were not on course in spite of the GPS indicating they were.

In information warfare terms, here are some of the tactics they see being used now that many of you will recognize:

1) Engineered complexity - where they throw in nonsensical variables (information) to distract. This is designed to keep you from serially processing multiple channels & give you processing overload that prevents you from toggling different channels of information.

IE: they create processing decoys to distract you from truth.

2) They are trying to reframe the issue by focusing on details that do not matter. They do this by throwing in a variable that is not relevant to the main equation.

3) Common sense, skepticism and intelligence are huge “overlays” that get in the way of manipulating human behavior so they analyze you to learn how to create channel overload as you toggle/handle different channels of information such as the speed of the boat, temperature of the water etc.

3) They need to load you up with enough variance to create channel overload so you create an error that they can use to discredit you. One way is to create doubt in yourself. Most effective because you make yourself less efficient when your brain is processing self-doubt. And it will propogate into the future.

“Population so much easier to dupe today than 20 years ago.”

follow the money.

Who has taken respondsibility to pay for this "accident"?
 

ttyh

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
4,952
So frigging shamelessly bragging.


Max was gifted #17 by the graduating captain (who happened to wear 17 well) Max, as a freshman, is earning. He was moved to Dmid and has played every game since. Not his favorite position. But they needed him due to a few injuries. 2 days ago he was moved back to Omid. They want his speed. They want his shot. (Max is a legit 2 way middie. He can play where you put him. A true 2way is increasingly rare) I asked him if he would still get significant playing time. His response? I don't know but i would rather sit and be developed in my game (and why they wanted him) than just get stuck playing Dmid.

Max is playing behind 2 All Americans and 3 all conference. (And, yes, it's known he was a 2 time UAAA. It's known he was a D1 recruit. It's known he was Ohio all state football (there was serious discussion with the coaches if he was looking to play football. (He was more heavily recruited for FB than lacrosse. A couple of schools trying to recruit him for both. No)) He played against and with (and held his own) a few of his teammates over the years, not to mention some of the biggest names in the game RN. There's a reason Max insisted on playing out east over the years. He wanted to go up against the best. Coaches and captains are hard on him. He gets it. Max has never sat. Good lesson to learn. Earn it, Boy. Learn. Get better.

We raised a man.

(The tape on his helmet is significant. It's the date of the passing of a man who Max loved )




17, you say?

giphy.gif
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,520

76ff5339-026e-4d3b-9659-9cd17623349f.jpeg
 

TopHook

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
13,236

What a stupid take from dawn. She knew she had to say what she said or be obliterated in the press for going against the grain right before the NC. Will be pulling for Carolina but fuck you dawn. I can love America and hate the president. Wonder how many how many of her players agree with her? Also wonder what iowas coach would say.
 

22*43*51

Boob Enthusiast
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
20,275


👀 Robert F. Kennedy Jr on the Connection Between the CIA, the Mafia, Woody Harrelson & JFK's Assassination

"Vietnam was a CIA project. CIA from beginning to end...The same people were involved in [JFK's] assassination...I'm very good friends with Woody Harrelson...His father was a guy called Charles Harrelson who was involved in my uncle's assassination."
 

TheRealJohnCooper

💎
Founder
Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
4,246
What a stupid take from dawn. She knew she had to say what she said or be obliterated in the press for going against the grain right before the NC. Will be pulling for Carolina but fuck you dawn. I can love America and hate the president. Wonder how many how many of her players agree with her? Also wonder what iowas coach would say.
What project housing did y’all find her in, good lawd.
 
Top Bottom