• In Memory of Rebarcock.

    As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Scartiger said:
Great American right here. Great guitarist also!



I video I recorded of Ted. Me along of with my 2 brothers has always loved music. I've been fortunate by the good Lord above cause he knew how much I loved music to get to be friends with some rock stars through my work. By the way I'm just a plumber.

Click to expand...

"There's only one dream: the American dream. There's no Mexican dream. Except to get the hell out of Mexico."
laugh.r191677.gif
 
sputniknews.com

5.6-Magnitude Quake Rocks Southwest Iran, Seismologists Say

According to the seismic data, the epicenter of the earthquake was located 48 km from the city of Yasuj, the administrative center of the southern province of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, at a depth of 10 km.
sputniknews.com sputniknews.com

Why do so many earthquakes occur at a depth of 10km? | U.S. Geological Survey

Ten kilometers is a "fixed depth". Sometimes data are too poor to compute a reliable depth for an earthquake. In such cases, the depth is assigned to be 10 km. Why that number? In many areas around the world, reliable depths tend to average 10 km or close to it. For example, if we made a...
www.usgs.gov www.usgs.gov
 
orng_blud said:
This was posted by a FB friend. We'll see how long it lasts:

This is what has been happening for the last three years. We just went through the second impeachment and now we are where I circled in red. Notice a lot of celebrities have started speaking out again, giving their opinions. They think we will listen and follow them. The stupid people will, they always do. But it won’t be long and we will be at the bottom where all of the pedo crimes will be declassified, and none of these sick people will be able to walk down the street. It’s coming soon. Analog video confessions will be aired and you’ll hear it from their own mouths. Maybe you’ll believe it then and understand this is what we’ve been fighting against all this time. The clock is ticking and nobody escapes this. Enjoy the show.
View attachment 7558
Click to expand...
Maybe follow the STARS means the events going on in Space. Isn't there another Rover hitting Mars soon? SpaceX is going full throttle and of course we have Space Force.
 
America 1st said:
How is he going to "take out" non enemy combatants? The military wouldn't even be able to execute such an order until they were considered as such (illegal).

Let say he does get them classified as enemy combatants via his own executive order somehow do you expect him to send in the military onto our allies soil to start arresting their citizens?

Lastly, if 45 -----> 47 then what? Are we to believe that the country is still going to collapse because he didn't arrest a couple humans?

The military doesn't have a duty to secure elections or determine if their chief executive is legitimate (state legs and Congress do that). If both groups sign off like they did with the IE then it's the military's duty to uphold the Constitution (and thus the chief executive).

The military only protects and defends the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. They don't technically preserve and protect The People or any of the founding ideas laid out in the Dec of Ind.

I don't mean this as a personal assault in any way either. Just playing devil's advocate and trying to make sure people understand exactly what the military is legally or morally allowed to do.

If we truly believe our government no longer serves our interests our only recourse is amendments or a Constitutional convention. There is no mechanism in the Constitution to simply 'abolish' the government and start over because the Dec of Ind declares certain ideas.

If we want the military to preserve or defend the Dec of Ind we could also amend the Constitution to make it say as much but it would need to be written in to Constitution. That's literally the only thing that matters to the military (in theory and practical execution).
Click to expand...
All true until one believes the September 2018 E-Order is lawful. If so, it's very clear:

DNI Reports significant Foreign Election Interference -----> President can nullify election ----> military in control.
 
Jcoker01 said:
Two documents with very different purposes.

Constitution specifically directs the government, not the people. It only grants the government rights that are consented to by the people. So as a sovereign, you do not have constitutional rights, you have protection of your rights.

DOI specifically declares every man sovereign and equal with inalienable god given rights. This is not a master guide or list of goals. This document founded the sovereign USA, is the first law in the US code, and was the document that gave us back freedom.

To uphold the constitution is to protect the people’s rights.

DOI states that if the government doesn’t do just that, then it is the right of the people to abolish it.

newsflash the constitution has failed, and you no longer have god given rights. You have permission from the government.
Click to expand...
Kevin Shipp says this in his first CIA whistleblower U Toob vid - I'm surprised it's still up (see below). Trump was trying to reverse this course and make us a Constitutional Republic again - had he won 4 more years (which he did) he would have reversed this trend and we would have been very close to it again, flourishing in it, and his successor would have completed the deal.

This is why the election steal was so huge.

 
Fmoshermw said:
All true until one believes the September 2018 E-Order is lawful. If so, it's very clear:

DNI Reports significant Foreign Election Interference -----> President can nullify election ----> military in control.
Click to expand...
Military doesn't have a role according to the EO. It's all departments levying sanctions and seizing property. Nothing about conducting new elections or the military.

The military could in theory hold as many elections as they want but an executive order isn't law and even if it were it wouldn't supercede article 1.

Electors, state legs, and Congress determine elections and their winners (period).

Otherwise what would happen is any executive could rerun any election due to foreign interference (since we know it happens every time).

Also people need to personally decide whether they believe voting is a right given to us by our creator because it's pretty obvious to me the answer is no and no amount of amendments in a document will change my mind.

Federal Register :: Request Access

www.federalregister.gov www.federalregister.gov
 
Last edited:
America 1st said:
Military doesn't have a role according to the EO. It's all departments levying sanctions and seizing property. Nothing about conducting new elections or the military.

The military could in theory could hold as many elections as they want but an executive order isn't law and even if it were it wouldn't supercede article 1.

Electors, state legs, and Congress determine elections and their winners (period).

Otherwise what would happen is any executive could rerun any election due to foreign interference (since we know it happens every time).

Also people need to personally decide whether they believe voting is a right given to us by our creator because it's pretty obvious to me the answer is no and no amount of amendments in a document will change my mind.

Federal Register :: Request Access

www.federalregister.gov www.federalregister.gov
Click to expand...
Not disagreeing but aren’t state legs also supposed to set rules for each election?
 
s-ou-thern said:
Not disagreeing but aren’t state legs also supposed to set rules for each election?
Click to expand...
They have pretty broad authority. Congress has certain Rights designated to them as a body under the Constitution but generally state legs determine the manner in which elections in their states are held.

Edit: article 1 section 4 is what you want.

constitution.congress.gov

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the United States Constitution and its Amendments.
constitution.congress.gov constitution.congress.gov
 

Similar threads

NotoriousOutlawRecords
TFSF & its true purpose
Replies
13
Views
555
NotoriousOutlawRecords
NotoriousOutlawRecords
Ash242
Help interpret and translate this director's faint and missing dialogue if you can please [R-18 WARNING]
Replies
6
Views
288
Rva
Rva
Cartoondude135
YouTube TERMINATED my account for NO REASON!
Replies
34
Views
1K
Asshole
Asshole
Chris Farley
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Welcome to TMAC!
Replies
0
Views
2K
Chris Farley
Chris Farley
Cartoondude135
Help me acquire discontinued sound effect libraries please
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Rva
Rva

Powering Our Platform

Total amount
$0.00
Goal
$1,776.00
Donate View

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom