Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

AmericanViking

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
9,313

So, what would make the suns rotation around earth slow? What about the moon? Is it eventually going to catch up with the sun because it’s moving slower?
 

SoonerMD09

Elite
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
221
Just catching up on the pence/ tucker interview.

Holy shit. The context was literally tucker saying the well being of the American people supercedes our involvement in Ukraine and pence's response was 'not my concern'

So to recap. The well being of the American people wouldn't be pence's concern if he were president.

What a fûcking joke
 

CDDP

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
8,448
F1M8_8EX0AEXAq2
 

ETNVol

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
4,205
Just catching up on the pence/ tucker interview.

Holy shit. The context was literally tucker saying the well being of the American people supercedes our involvement in Ukraine and pence's response was 'not my concern'

So to recap. The well being of the American people wouldn't be pence's concern if he were president.

What a fûcking joke

That's clearly not the context.

"Your concern is that the Ukrainians, a country most people can't find on a map, who've received tens of billions of US tax $, don't have enough tanks. I think it's a fair question to ask, where's the concern for the United States in that?"

"It's not my concern. Tucker, I've heard that routine from you before, but that's not my concern. I'm running for President of the United States because I think this country is in a lot of trouble..." To act like he was addressing the "concern for U.S." as not his concern is spin usually reserved for the "fine people" accusers.

He clearly was saying Tucker's "tank concern" point was mischaracterized as his "concern", then said his concern was America. People can bash Pence for a million things, all the while pretending like Trump's first big decision, Pence, wasn't a massive mistake, but that part of the interview isn't one of them. It's a lie Trumpians have been gloating over all weekend, which is comical, in a sane world, the worse Pence looks the worse Trump looks since Trump deemed him worthy to the degree of choosing him as his potential successor.
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Legendary
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
9,041
If you've wondered how we got so screwed up...

They've been trying for a very long time...

2653
Jan 06, 2019 12:32:35 PM EST
Q

[RBG]
Why was she 'selected'?Who appointed her?Remember [her] history.

Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Highlights:
>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)

>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)

>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)

>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)

>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)

>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)

>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)

>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.

http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/

📁Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?
What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?
What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?
What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?
Who is managing her care?
Who is 'really' managing her care?
The clock is ticking.
PANIC IN DC.
Q
 

Goldhedge

Legendary
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
9,041

Goldhedge

Legendary
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
9,041

Facebook survey asks users if they condone pedophilia​

Facebook is under fire for publishing a stomach-churning survey that asked users whether pedophiles should be allowed to solicit “sexual pictures” from...


By Nicolas Vega
Mar 06, 2018 02:45 AM
2 min. read
View original

Facebook is under fire for publishing a stomach-churning survey that asked users whether pedophiles should be allowed to solicit “sexual pictures” from underage girls.

The cringeworthy poll surfaced at the top of Facebook’s home page for an unspecified number of users this past weekend, according to a report.

 

ETNVol

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
4,205
Did you actually watch the video of just read the top? Trump said that he would tell Z that it has to stop and then He'd tell Putin that if he doesn't stop he'll give Ukr even more stuff. The whole point was that it would be over in 1 day.

Yes, that's exactly what he said. Is your point he didn't really mean it?

Trump couldn't protect the vote in a single precinct, in spite of having 4 years to prepare, but is going to stop a war on the other side of the world, with a couple of threats? You know better than that.

Recall prior to this war, Trump was the only recent president to actually arm Ukraine, and he chided the Obama administration for not doing so.
 

hmt5000

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
7,369
Yes, that's exactly what he said. Is your point he didn't really mean it?

Trump couldn't protect the vote in a single precinct, in spite of having 4 years to prepare, but is going to stop a war on the other side of the world, with a couple of threats? You know better than that.

Recall prior to this war, Trump was the only recent president to actually arm Ukraine, and he chided the Obama administration for not doing so.
You are either not understanding the conversation or intentionally twisting it. The whole point was to end the war. He was saying providing a stick to go along with a carrot. Pretty hard not to see that.
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
23,652


1689588420595.png
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
23,652
1689588506304.png



 
Top Bottom